1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

How much money and how many free agents do we need to win in 08?

Discussion in 'Houston Astros' started by redgoose, Aug 3, 2007.

  1. redgoose

    redgoose Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2003
    Messages:
    1,532
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lee and Berkman also start rallies! How often does Everett start a rally? :D And don't say it's because he bats #8. We've tried having him lead off or bat 2nd and that didn't work out either.
     
  2. redgoose

    redgoose Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2003
    Messages:
    1,532
    Likes Received:
    0
    I completely agree with your post. If we play Ty at 3rd next year, play Bruntlett everyday at SS, and sign a new catcher that's already 3 offensive upgrades, only adding salary for the new catcher, while removing Ausmus from the payroll. We could also resign Loretta, having Biggio of the books, to fight it out with Burke for 2nd base. My money would be on Loretta. Another slight upgrade at no cost. Not superstar upgrades, but 3-4 improvements none the less with very little cost all helping the team in every offensive category. If we could then sign either a free agent CF or RF slugger (which there are tons of), we would be drastically better offensively, and could even be considered one of the better hitting teams in the NL only 1 year after being among the very worst. :cool:

    Then, it's all about the pitching. We have to sign a legitimate #2 starting pitcher to even compete for a playoff spot in the worst division in baseball, or we have no chance from day #1. Then resign Jennings (I think he could be a good #3) with a simple vastly improved offense like i suggested above and suddenly our team looks pretty good, has a chance to win everyday, and should be in contention. Zambrano would be my ideal pitcher to sign, he knows the division and is a better hitter than 1/2 our team is, but somehow i don't see us spending the money on him that we wants. I know he said he wants to stay a Cub, but they didn't resign him before the season like he wanted and have a very high payroll already. I think we could sweep in there and snag him if we really wanted too. :)
     
  3. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,422
    Likes Received:
    39,984
    LOL - what a bunch of hooey........

    Our starting pitching has collapsed, unless Adam Everett is playing all 8 fielding positions, he would not make THAT much of a difference in overall team ERA.


    Max,

    I get that AE is a great defender, and I get that you think he is the best option on the Astros, I can not argue that point.

    I am saying he is NOT good enough to be your every day SS.......he should be a late inning replacement.

    DD
     
  4. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924

    Not good enough to be your every day SS??? He was the every day SS on a team that won the pennant, DaDa! The only team in franchise history to win a pennant!
     
  5. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,422
    Likes Received:
    39,984
    Yes, but they lost the world series in 4 games because the team's offense was so anemic, and AE was a big part of that anemia.

    And I don't want a pennant, I want a WS.......one pennant in 45 years is an aberation......

    Team's could pitch around the top of the lineup because the bottom was such a cream puff.

    I am not blaming it all on AE, I just want a SS that can hit his way out of a paper bag, and field his position well.

    Is that asking too much? How many other team's have great defensive/lousy offensive short stops starting for them now?

    AE is a GREAT defender, but IMO, being one sided is not enough.......

    And arguably the reason that team won the pennant was because of great pitching......and yes, defense....

    But great defense is not as valuable if you don't have the pitching anymore.

    AE is wonderful as a SS when you have quality pitching, but his liability on offense is magnified when starting pitching is suspect....or average.

    I would rather have a SS that is GOOD on both sides of the ball rather than one who is great on one and HORRID on the other.

    DD
     
  6. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    1. it's ridiculous to say that AE isn't good enough to be the SS on a championship team because they lost the WS. give me a break. you know better than that.

    2. once again...i'm not arguing that there is no upgrade to AE out there. i'm arguing that bruntlett isn't it.

    3. ozzie smith was a pedestrian offensive player. he was a fantastic defensive player. he's in the HOF. if he were a 1B, that would never have happened. if he were a rightfielder, that would never have happened. he was a SS. you're trying to apply standards to middle infielders that just aren't applied.

    AE has 2140 career AB's so far...he's batting .247 with a .299 OBP and a .357 slugging average.

    Through Ozzie Smith's first four seasons he had 2233 AB's... batted .230...his OBP was around .294...and about a .277 slugging average.

    Those numbers are eerily similar. There's no need to pretend that great defensive SS's aren't given a pass at the plate with their bats. It's happened for as long as I can remember. And Ozzie ended up in Cooperstown. I'm not suggesting that's where AE's headed...just suggesting there MIGHT be more value in AE than you give credit for in terms of run differential.
     
  7. SamCassell

    SamCassell Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    9,536
    Likes Received:
    2,435
    The "good enough to start in 2005" argument gets old after awhile. There are reasons why AE starts, but his merits or lack thereof should be based on current production and not what he did 2 years ago. I mean, Jason Lane started every game of the world series, but I don't hear anyone stating that he should be a starter now just because he was a starter then. Morgan Ensberg started for us 2 years ago, now he's been cut. Willy T got traded away. Bags retired. Times change, players change. Everett's OPS has dropped more than 60 points since that season. He's driven in a total of 15 runs in 200+ ABs. He stole 20+ bases in '05, he no longer runs. In short, Everett of 2007 is not the same offensive player he was in 2005 (and he wasn't anything special then).
     
  8. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,422
    Likes Received:
    39,984
    He is good enough to start on a SPECIFIC type of team, one where offense is not needed, that is NOT the case of the Astros, nor almost any major league team anymore. Who has 4 quality starting pitchers?

    I don't know if Bruntlett is it or not, but I think we have to have an upgrade at SS to compete in today's MLB.

    Ozzie Smith was incredible, no doubt, but he developed into a good hitter, while Ozzie got better AE is getting worse, and MLB has changed since the days of the wizard, team's do not play small ball, they don't steal, they go for the big stick........not the same game at all.

    The past is not indicative of the game today. There is a reason that lots of teams are not emulating the light hitting SS theory, because now, lots of the short stops are hitting with power, and hitting a high average AND playing good defense. Just look at the Marlins young SS....

    AE might have been given a pass in baseball played during the 70s and 80s, now, he is just not good enough on offense to warrant a starting position.

    IMO.

    I don't know if the Astros have a better option, but they darned well better be looking for one.....

    DD
     
  9. redgoose

    redgoose Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2003
    Messages:
    1,532
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm sick of these Ozzie Smith comparisons. :mad: He played in an age where if you hit 20 homeruns you were the cleanup hitter. You also might notice pitchers don't pitch complete games anymore. Also scoring runs have dramatically increased.

    Sorry to dissapoint so many of you, but teams aren't looking for SS's from the 70's era that can't hit but play excellent defense anymore. Those players are easy to find in college and the minor leagues. Have you ever heard of a single team being remotely interested in Adam Everett since he's the second coming of Ozzie Smith if not better? Try naming 1 or 2 teams that would bench their starting SS to play AE if we gave him to them. :confused:

    Also, just like AE, if Ozzie Smith played today, nobody other than the team's fans he played for (if he could make any team) would know who he was. Also, if they did, they'd be looking for an upgrade. Just like AE, he would have no trade value.
     
    #69 redgoose, Aug 7, 2007
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2007
  10. redgoose

    redgoose Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2003
    Messages:
    1,532
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm just so glad at least someone else out there gets this! :eek: You must actually at least watch a baseball game once in a while. ;)

    AE supporters act like every ball is hit to the short stop and AE is the only guy in MLB with enough range to field any of those balls. Otherwise, they won't just be hits, they'll somehow lead to a runs being scored. Once in a blue moon AE can field a ball your average SS couldn't field leading to a hit. Way more than once a blue moon, a good SS could also get a hit that could lead to a run being scored. :rolleyes:

    Also, some of the best Astros teams didn't exactly have great defense. Berkman was never a good outfielder. Jeff Kent was a downgrade at 2nd base, Ward was horrible, Biggio wasn't close to a real center fielder, Julio Lugo committed so any errors i couldn't count, etc. Yet AE is a must if we want to go to the WS. (That is if we also have Oswalt, Pettite, Clemens, Lidge and Morgan Ensberg in All Star form) :rolleyes:
     
  11. Rocketman95

    Rocketman95 Hangout Boy

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    48,984
    Likes Received:
    1,445
    Ya'll are right. With Bruntlett starting all year, this team would be in the division lead. :rolleyes:

    No one's saying they're opposed to a replacement for Everett. You just have to be better all around than someone like Bruntlett or Loretta. For some of us, it makes more sense to improve the offense everywhere else you can before removing the best defensive player at arguably the most important defensive position.

    But yeah, we're the ones that don't watch the games. You're the ones that only watch the box scores.

    Oh and let me go ahead and add :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
     
  12. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,422
    Likes Received:
    39,984
    RM,

    I don't just want an improvement at SS....that is just a start.....I want Starting pitching, I want a better catcher, I want a better 3rd baseman...

    I want Burke and Loretta to fight it out at 2b.....

    I want Willy Taveras and the gang back from Colorado...

    And I want Woody Williams to retire.....

    This team has a ton of holes, and I would not rank Everett as the number 1 hole to fix....not by a long shot.

    But he is one of many that need fixing...IMHO.

    DD
     
  13. redgoose

    redgoose Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2003
    Messages:
    1,532
    Likes Received:
    0

    That's exactly what was said. :rolleyes: I'll go one step further to make you feel better. We still wouldn't be in 1st with A-Rod at SS.

    But then again, he doesn't have Everetts range. :( So even if AE was healthy all year, the extra runs produced by A-Rod would have been balanced out by all the runs AE saves. Therefore, AE should get a 250 million dollar contract when he's eligable for free agency. I'm sure the bidding wars on him will be surreal. I could see the Astros trying to outbid a minor league team who's starting SS got promoted to the big league. I'm curious to see what an arbitration judge would award him as well. :D
     
  14. Blake

    Blake Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Messages:
    9,970
    Likes Received:
    3,005
    Though I'm not really a Bruntlett fan at all, I for one don't miss AE and his "killer defense" and terrible bat.

    I agree AE is an amazing SS, but he's too much of a liability in the batter's box.

    He would be perfect on an AL team where he can hit in the 9 hole

    But Bruntlett isn't too good either
     
  15. Aceshigh7

    Aceshigh7 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2003
    Messages:
    3,902
    Likes Received:
    258
    Pitching is the most important.

    Sign or trade for two very good starting pitchers to shore up our rotation, and obtain one good reliever to replace Wheeler. And also re-sign Lamb, and this team should be set and likely win the Central next year.
     
  16. Nick

    Nick Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 1999
    Messages:
    50,850
    Likes Received:
    17,253
    stop b****ing about the SS (who will be our #8 hitter, no matter who is there).

    Start banging the drum for more pitching... top to bottom.
     
  17. Akhorahil

    Akhorahil Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2007
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    0
    I second that. It would be one thing if there was a hot SS going to be available in the FA market this offseason... I'd understand the debate going this far. But there isn't. And if you think Uribe is an upgrade at SS... WOW... hehehe

    Can the Brewers bring back Cordero and Linebrink? What do you think about Al Reyes? Do you bring back Springer? Do you bring back Miller or do you go after Romero? Or do you go after both and three lefties in the pen with McLemore? Can the Astros land Carlos Zambrano?

    These are the questions we should be debating. We will have plenty of time to debate AE. He can become a FA after next season. Let's try not to skip ahead.
     
  18. Akhorahil

    Akhorahil Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2007
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    0
    sry for double post. but...

    And if you they don't land Zambrano... wtf do you do then?
     
  19. Refman

    Refman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2002
    Messages:
    13,674
    Likes Received:
    312
    Of course for a SS with killer defense to even matter, you have to have the offense to produce a lead.

    I personally don't care if we lose 3 to 1 or 5 to 1. It's still a loss.
     
  20. DOMINATOR

    DOMINATOR Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,458
    Likes Received:
    256
    I personally don't care if we win 3 to 1 or 5 to 1. It's still a win.
     

Share This Page