Reggie is a HOF'r no doubt. Too many clutch moments. I think the thing that puts him above guys like Mullin/Richmond is his consistency/longevity. Keep in mind, he's scored over 25000 points. He played a few years in the 80's, all of the 90's, and a few years in the 2000's without having any crazy highs or lows during that time. Mullin definately had a higher peak late 80s/ early 90's but he fell pretty hard pretty fast. Mitch was definitely more well rounded but he disappeared after 99 and does not have the playoff moments that Miller has. *In response to an earlier post comparing him to Ray Allen, I'd have to disagree. Ray is/was more athletic and used to drive to the hoop as much as he shot the ball. I think he was more of a threat in an ISO situation that Miller under normal circumstances. (i.e. not the playoffs, that's Miller time!)
