1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Hollinger] It took 1.6 seconds for Roy to catch-and-shoot

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Spacemoth, Nov 7, 2008.

  1. Fierguard

    Fierguard Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    13
    There were questionable calls through out the game. That is part of the game. I do not want to blame the refs as we should have made the plays so that the refs were not in the position to do things to us. We need more then T-mac and I think we need Battier back badly as I think he understands how to space and where to be on the court better then anyone else on the rockets.

    It was a tough lose. I lost sleep over it and I I did not even play. We need to rebound, we need to play better offense, we need to beat teams by 5 so we take the whistle or lack there of out of there hands.

    I do not want to say as there were alot of calls that should have been called... but we needed to make plays to make that an non-issue.

    Fierguard
     
  2. AXG

    AXG Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Messages:
    6,067
    Likes Received:
    927
    That's what I thought the whole time. He couldn't catch, jump and shoot in only .8 seconds. The clock started too late and even earlier in the game the announcer said the "clock's not running."
     
  3. Spacemoth

    Spacemoth Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    9,901
    Likes Received:
    4,660
    I wrote one.
     
  4. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,892
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    If you're going to complain, that's not what you say. The clock is supposed to start once the player receives the ball, not before.
     
  5. gwatson86

    gwatson86 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,664
    Likes Received:
    191
    Fired off my angry email. :D
     
  6. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,166
    Likes Received:
    48,318
    I believe we got screwed but unfortunately that is part of homecourt advantage.
     
  7. across110thstreet

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2001
    Messages:
    12,855
    Likes Received:
    1,611
    I'm not even going to argue whether the clock was running or not or whether he got the shot off, but everybody in this thread that thinks it's impossible to get a shot off in .8 doesn't know NBA.
     
  8. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,881
    Likes Received:
    39,829
    He definitely can get an NBA shot off in .8 seconds, but in this case he didn't. The clock should start as soon as he has the ball, and here it didn't. He planted his feet, set, and then begin to go into his jumpshot before the clock ever ticked off a single tenth of a second.
     
  9. gwatson86

    gwatson86 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Messages:
    2,664
    Likes Received:
    191
    It's easily possible to get a shot off, just not that shot.
     
  10. Hayesfan

    Hayesfan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2006
    Messages:
    10,906
    Likes Received:
    371
    Wekko do you mind if I use that picture in my blog post for the day? I will give you credit for the capture of course.
     
  11. wekko368

    wekko368 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    8,915
    Likes Received:
    1,028
    go right ahead. credit clutchfans.
     
  12. Asian Sensation

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 1999
    Messages:
    18,255
    Likes Received:
    7,349
    .8 is plenty of time to get off A SHOT I don't think most people arguing that. But a catch, turn, elevate to the highest point with a slow ass release? That's a lot of movement in .8 sec. Regardless, it was an incredible shot and hopefully this will make the team better and stronger and not a coward dog with its tail between its legs.
     
  13. Spacemoth

    Spacemoth Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    9,901
    Likes Received:
    4,660
    At 0.8 seconds you're essentially looking at catching the ball as you are making your upswing towards jumping and releasing the ball. You simply don't have enough time to catch the ball in mid-air like he did, LAND, TURN AROUND, and then chunk it up. Again you don't have to catch the ball in mid-air and release it, but you do have to make sure you are in that part of your stride where you are taking a step forward and rising up rather than coming down, planting, turning, and then shooting.
     
  14. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,411
    Likes Received:
    2,643
    Actually the league has ruled that you can catch and shoot a set shot in 0.4 seconds. He had twice that long.
     
  15. wekko368

    wekko368 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    8,915
    Likes Received:
    1,028
    its all from the nba website. heres one of roy catching the ball. notice where tmac is when roy catches the ball. then look where he is when roy is rising up (other picture).

    and we all know that tmac isnt known for his speed.

    [​IMG]
     
  16. across110thstreet

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2001
    Messages:
    12,855
    Likes Received:
    1,611
    exactly. it's a determined possibility.

    that's why they knew tracy only had the chance of a tip- in or an alley oop with .2
     
  17. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,881
    Likes Received:
    39,829
    Right, but again, that is based on the premise of instant catch and release in a fluid motion. He caught the ball, turned, squared up, and began his jumpshot and not even a single tenth had ticked off.

    According to what happened last night, a player can make a shot with 0.00 left on the game clock.
     
  18. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,551
    Likes Received:
    38,774

    Did you see this picture?

    [​IMG]

    This is after he caught it, came down and pivoted......notice the lack of time that has gone off the clock?

    DD
     
  19. ClutchCityReturns

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    13,411
    Likes Received:
    2,643
    He actually turned while catching the ball and went straight into his shot. I haven't timed it myself, but it's a lot closer to 0.8 than people on this board want to admit. What I have seen from the video tells me that the clock was started about .3 seconds after Roy had possession, but that the clock also expired about .3 seconds after Roy released. Therefore I estimate that it really was about 0.8 seconds.
     
  20. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,551
    Likes Received:
    38,774
    ESPN timed it at 1.6 seconds from catch to release........so....while you make a good point about getting a shot up in a short amount of time, your argument is moot.

    DD
     

Share This Page