The green party calls for recounts often knowing the outcome won't change. They aren't doing this to help Clinton.
That didn't answer my question. The states they chose for recounts are all states the left lost. If its for "election integrity", shouldn't they be calling for states that the left won as well? What about New Hampshire, Virginia, Nevada, Colorado? Those were all close states too...
According to the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, 6.4% of illegal aliens cast ballots in the 2008 election. 8% of them cast ballots in 2012. That means around 3 million illegals cast ballots in 2016. Hillary lost 87% of the counties in the United States, and only experienced statistically abnormal spikes in sanctuary cities: Clinton and Obama both encouraged illegals to vote: Take away the illegals and the dead and the real numbers will reflect polls like this: 50,000 people polled in 50 states, 1/3 republican 1/3 democrat 1/3 independent. Trump won 67-19
Hey RealMoran (as you would spell it) Your sources are fake news basically. Stop buying into propaganda you sheep. http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...illion-undocumented-immigrants-did-not-vote-/
LOL. I'm sure you have no idea why Stein chose those specific states...being as you have an opinion on just about every other matter ever discussed in this forum. Meanwhile, the Clinton campaign (in other words, Hillary Clinton herself) has joined the effort. Remember this statement in the debate made by Clinton just 1 month ago? I guess Hillary is appalled with herself?
If Trump is claiming millions of illegal votes happened in California, New Hampshire, and Virginia - why doesn't he put up the money and have a recount so they can prove it? oh wait, that would just make him look foolish when they don't find an illegal votes.
Jill Stein is no fan of Clinton, and she knows as well as anyone that a recount isn't going to change the vote. That's not the reason they are saying they want to do it. It's more to get rid of electronic voting machines which are susceptible to hacking from what I heard her say. Clinton isn't "joining" the effort - she is sending a representative to observe which any candidate is allowed to do. It's what Trump should do as well in order to ensure that the recount is being done correctly. You just don't know the facts. Your candidate is the one who is claiming 3 million votes were illegal. So why isn't he asking for a recount to make sure the problem gets addressed? Oh, he's lying that's why.
Again....why only those 3 states? Why not include states that were close but in Clinton's favor? http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/26/politics/clinton-campaign-recount/index.html Clinton to join recount that Trump calls 'scam' CNN seems to disagree with your assessment.
No....President Obama did not encourage illegal aliens to vote. He was saying it was important for Latino citizens to vote, especially in order to give voice to those in their community "who can't legally vote". but, I guess some folks here what they want to hear.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-co...tizens-Vote-in-US-Elections-Richman-et-al.pdf I can't find your study that suggests that 3 million illegal aliens voted.
This was an article from 2015...you can damn very well bet that millions voted against Trump for this election.. http://www.capoliticalreview.com/capoliticalnewsandviews/poll-13-of-illegal-aliens-admit-they-vote/
Wisconsin Green Party co-chairman George Martin said the party is seeking a "reconciliation of paper records" -- a request that could go further than a simple recount, possibly spurring an investigation into the integrity of Wisconsin's voting system. "This is a process, a first step to examine whether our electoral democracy is working," Martin said. Both the Clinton campaign and the White House have said they see no evidence that any voting systems were hacked, although the Clinton campaign said Saturday it will take part in the recounts, joining with Stein, to ensure the recount is "fair to all sides." http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/27/politics/donald-trump-voter-fraud-popular-vote/index.html
No, you can't--not without proof. Polls driven by poltical operatives do not constitute proof of anything. Tell your candidate to sack-up and demand a recount and investigation to track down the "millions" of illegal voters/votes.
What do recounts do to validate the qualifications of the voters? They just verify the count of the votes that have already been accepted.
