No it wasn't someone running for president. It was someone NEXT IN LINE to be the president. But apparently that's a big difference as far as you and b_asso are concerned.
You should know, you support the party that constantly questions the manliness of homosexuals and other political opponents
i didnt say it makes one less of a man. i just find it incredibly hypocritical that certain people like texx will chide others for perceived cowardice (kerry in vietnam) while their boy was a draft dodging cheerleader and chide others for being effeminate (john edwards) while their boy likes to hang out with gay male hookers. again, the fact that texx of all people started a thread about childish name calling is the height of irony.
Um, well, since you asked the question in reference to Bush. Here he is pretending to be in TANG: Here he is pretending to be a Navy pilot: Here he is carrying a fake turkey while pretending to serve it to the troops: Here he is pretending to care about Katrina: Here he is pretending to care about the troops: Here he is pretending to be a cowboy:
Really it just exposes HellaFat for the fraud that she is. She wants to 'change the tone' in Washington, then she spews the same venom that the extremists like MoveOn.org, dailykos, etc would emit. Everyone already knew she was a hypocrite, but this does reinforce the fact. I'd love to see her as the nominee from the lib side of the ticket. You think we had fun with John Forbes Kerry, just wait until Hildabeast 666 gets pilloried!!
again, what does being a cheerleader have to do with anything? if he was a draft dodger, surely that would be enough. why mention the cheerleader part? second, what does hugging a gay man, hooker or not, have to do with relative femininity? sounds to me like W's a guy who's completely secure in his sexuality, and not threatened by physical contact with a gay man. contrast that with the democratic party, that twitters uncontrollably at the word gay, and uses "outing" as a political tool. shameful.
You're funniest little queen here, you know that? You enjoy b****ing about the Democratic party "outing" people, while you make hot man-love to the party that has tried to constitutionally enshrine gay-bashing any chance you get. Your alternative to "outing" of guys like Craig or Foley is to let closet homosexuals and pedophiles that disproportionately populate the right wing continue making a career out of bashing gays and give state sanction to anti-gay discrimination. The whole thing is an absolute scream, you're no basso, you're a diva.
pray tell, what do homosexuality and pedophilia have in common? and why do you view words like "diva" and "queen" as insults? sounds like you're a little homophobe.
Please provide a list of times when the Democratic Party (the Party, not GLAAD, not HRC, not Perez Hilton) has: a) "twittered uncontrollably" at the word "gay" b) used "outing" as a political tool TIA
Nothing, unless you campaign for office by bashing gays when you are one and campaign for office by crowing about your achievements as chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children when you fancy little boys. Oh, and the other thing the two have in common when the above sentence comes into play is that the political party they belong to covers up the gay hypocrisy and the pedophilic actions.
Yes, it does sound as though Sam is a homophobe. Or at least he loves to sling around the accusation of being gay as a weapon. A lot of libs like to do that. Quite hypocritical. Sam, as part of your sensitivity training and road to recovery, please go get a haircut from John Edwards' stylist.
name calling from someone leaning slightly to the left...get out of town! i don't believe it for a minute.