1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Hiding Their Intent To Cut Social Security

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by adoo, Feb 16, 2023.

  1. adoo

    adoo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2003
    Messages:
    11,901
    Likes Received:
    8,012
    you can't possibly be this stupid
     
  2. StupidMoniker

    StupidMoniker I lost a bet

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    16,184
    Likes Received:
    2,831
    Why do you care if corporations buy stock from investors? If 10 people own a company together, and 1 of them sells his shares to the company, now 9 people own the company and the 10th person presumably has about 10% of the current value of the company in cash. So what? It is really no different than dividends, just some shareholders exit the company at the same time. You may prefer reinvestment or pay increases or charitable donations, but those are decisions of the board of those companies. Why should you or I or 200 million other Americans decide what Amazon shareholders decide to do with the profit generated by their company?
     
  3. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,170
    Likes Received:
    48,345
    Sure I would be for all that and maybe that would be enough to keep Social Security solvent in perpetuity. That said the idea of social security was never to be something that people would live in for 20+ years. If I recall correctly the life expectancy when it was implemented was 67.

    People are living longer now and can be more productive well into their late 60’s in general. If we’re going to be increasing the payouts to adjust for the increasing cost of living we should also be considering that the need for social security at 65 might not be so pressing.

    We can still maintain the exceptions for those who can’t physically work at a younger ages.
     
  4. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,170
    Likes Received:
    48,345
    That’s a fair answer but I would have to see the numbers to see if that could work. Given the size of social security I’m not sure that you could cut enough to make it work given current government revenue, non FICA.
     
  5. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,170
    Likes Received:
    48,345
    SHUT UP YOU FAT LOSER NECKBEARD!
    :eek:;):p
     
    JuanValdez likes this.
  6. astros123

    astros123 Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Messages:
    14,029
    Likes Received:
    11,672
    ...lol when trump passed the 2 trillion dollar tax scam the argument was, "it'll bring back manufacturing jobs and help income inequality! Trickle down economics works guys!!!"

    Now that the stats and science has shown that the tax cuts have done literally nothing but fuel stock buy backs the same folks don't even try to argue the good social economic benefits of trickle down economics.

    Their argument has morphed into, "who cares what they do with the profits after we passed a trillion dollar deficit filled tax scam bill"

    I'm just happy that frauds like you are more honest with how much of a utter joke your economic policy is.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now