1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Here is another math problem (slightly harder)

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by pirc1, Apr 26, 2007.

  1. Cannonball

    Cannonball Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    21,888
    Likes Received:
    2,334
    96

    0 - 18 = -18 (Cost of Jacket)
    -18 + 100 = 82 (Man takes in $100)
    82 - 78 = 4 (Man pays 78 out of pocket. He had to borrow $1 to give $79 change, so he only paid $78 out of pocket.)
    4 - 100 = -96 (For BS reasons, he has to pay $100 for the buck he borrowed)

    He loses $96.
     
  2. AB

    AB Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2000
    Messages:
    1,813
    Likes Received:
    1,761
    Missed the 21 shady young man gave to Store Owner

    so $97 sounds right
     
  3. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,898
    Likes Received:
    39,879
    I was just playing up the riddle. Your answer is what I guessed earlier before allowing Buck to confuse me.
     
  4. Buck Turgidson

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    100,712
    Likes Received:
    102,926
    Hell, you can't expect me to watch the Astros, do tax prep AND think about this stuff, can you?
     
  5. justtxyank

    justtxyank Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    42,898
    Likes Received:
    39,879
    LOL if this is right I'm going to scream. i just assumed the thread creator mistyped when he wrote one dollars change.
     
  6. francis 4 prez

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2001
    Messages:
    22,025
    Likes Received:
    4,552
    it's ninety-seven.

    and dookiester explained it the best with that analogy.


    edit: assuming, because it's the only thing that makes sense, that one dollars change is one hundred dollars change (who is getting 1 dollar in change back for a hundred dollar bill?) and dollars is plural so the hundred was supposed to be there.
     
  7. myco

    myco Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    816
    Likes Received:
    280
    $3 profit from transaction
    $100 to give back

    -$97 total
     
  8. Jimes

    Jimes Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    868
    Likes Received:
    27
    Doesn't this question have a typo?? Yes, I think it's $97.
     
  9. professorjay

    professorjay Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2006
    Messages:
    9,676
    Likes Received:
    388
    Haha. That's what I assumed too. I was puzzled but assumed what most others did too. The way it was written I would've never interpreted it this way.
     
  10. pirc1

    pirc1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,137
    Likes Received:
    1,882
    Ya I missed a word there in the question now corrected.
     
  11. texanskan

    texanskan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,565
    Likes Received:
    163
  12. JayZ750

    JayZ750 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2000
    Messages:
    25,432
    Likes Received:
    13,390
    Your analysis overcounts the $79. If he only got $21 in the first transaction, he doesn't have to pay the $79 back, because there is no change. He only pays that back if he gets $100 in the first transaction, which he does, so that is why he pays back the $79 in change.

    Either change the first $3 to $82 (the $100 - $18 cost), or get rid of the last -$79. Either way, the answer is

    -$97
     
  13. Cannonball

    Cannonball Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    21,888
    Likes Received:
    2,334
    Unless there's still stuff missing. I get a $3 profit. He borrows $100 and give it back, which he'd have to do even if it wasn't counterfeit. So it really boils down to selling an $18 jacket for $21.
     
  14. F.D. Khan

    F.D. Khan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    2,456
    Likes Received:
    11
    Depends on whether the $3 markup is considered
    a loss since it could have been sold for $21 to someone else.


    - $18 or $21 Cost or Value
    + $100 from store next door (kept $21)
    - $79 change to individual
    - $100 back to other store owner


    So its either $97 or $100.

    I'm still questioning whether it would be $115 or $118.
     
  15. Cannonball

    Cannonball Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    21,888
    Likes Received:
    2,334
    You didn't factor in the $100 the young man gave to the store owner.
     
  16. texanskan

    texanskan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,565
    Likes Received:
    163
    it is 197 nothing else

    he off the bat is down 97 (18 in cost plus 79 bucks he gave back to the guy)

    Then another 100 to the owner since he had to pay him back for the fake.

    He only loses 97 if he would of had change.
     
  17. myco

    myco Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    816
    Likes Received:
    280
    He did not borrow. He thought he was trading a $100 bill for $100 in smaller bills -- an equal exchange.
     
  18. professorjay

    professorjay Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2006
    Messages:
    9,676
    Likes Received:
    388
    Maybe if we were in an economics class.
     
  19. Cannonball

    Cannonball Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    21,888
    Likes Received:
    2,334
    Owner pays $18 cost for jacket
    -18

    Young man gives owner $100
    -18 + 100 = 82

    Owner borrows $100 from neighbor
    82 + 100 = 182

    He gives $79 change to the young man
    182 - 79 = 103

    Bill is counterfeit, he has $100 less than he thought.
    103 - 100 = 3

    He still has to shell out another $100 to the neighbor
    3 - 100 = -97
     
  20. Jugdish

    Jugdish Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    9,072
    Likes Received:
    9,572
    How do stores stay afloat if they lose money each time they give someone change?
     

Share This Page