Yes, but man....the fact that he wanted to speak to her BEFORE she spoke to the committee.... Clemens is busted.....let's test that evidence now. DD
When he was talking about the Nanny, at the very first bit, he talked about Clemens ex wife recalling they were there. Gonna rewind and post quotes etc... DD
Clemens' whole plan of attack has been stupid. He throws out naive lines every time he's in trouble. Why did he keep the trainer? "I'm a forgiving guy..." From the body language alone I would say he's guilty. Evidence is another story.
The Chairman was talking about Roger's side sent documentation and evidence that he was NOT at Jose Cansecos house at any time between June 8-10th 1998 when Toronto was playing in Miami. They asked Roger if he was at the house or party during the deposition and Roger replied "NO" They said McNamee had a clear recollection Clemens was at the home, and received conflicting evidence.... Jose Canseco's ex wife Jessica Fisher believes she was there as well as Debbie Clemens, and that one key witness that would know for sure was the nanny..... DD
If the Clemens family was at the Canseco house in the "general" time period, I can accept that. It's very possible that McNamee was just a little off on remembering the specific time an event 10 years ago took place. If they were there "in that general time period", I don't think it matters if it was at the June 9 party or another date. It still backs up what McNamee says he saw (Clemens, kids with nanny). He just "misremembered" the specific date.
What does McNamee get for ratting on Clements? That is an honest question, I don't know that much about it all, does he get somekind of plea deal or something?
I haven't had a chance to watch this all morning, so I went home for lunch and turned it on. There is nothing like a bunch of out-of-practice lawyers getting a chance to grill a witness. They are like vultures to a dead animal.
I believe there is no deal in place for him at all, and he testified that same thing at this hearing. DD
