Hakeem ranked lower than Shaq,Wilt, Russell and Kareem

Actually Sampson should be listed as a PF as his rookie year was really the only year that he played center.

 

I interpreted it as based on their play with the Rockets. Let's be honest: with this question, clearly other teams are not a part?

You are right. But he could have an argument at either position. And maybe PG, for how often he tried to lead the break

 

Not related to specific chart, just wait a few ... if the Spurs win the title... I bet most sports analysts, critics, serious fans, and casual fans put Tim Duncan ahead of Dream, easily.

5 rings > 2 rings..."When MJ was retired." That's not me saying that... I don't think rings are the end all to be all.

Tim Duncan could 2-3 more rings, I wouldn't take him over any of the players.

Hell, I could use Dwight as an example, if Houston wins 3 or more titles...would be better player than Dream. Does Howard deserve a spot among the top 3-5 centers ever.

 

Well we all know that last sentence not to be true, but I would love to see how the media handles their obvious bias against Dwight and how it measures with their stance that rings are the only measure of a players greatness.

I wish it wasn't the case. Sometimes a player can simply be better but stuck with a poorly managed team for the majority of his career. Sometimes a player just lands in the perfect spot for a well run organisation. KG and Duncan are good examples of this.

 

PG: Oscar Robertson
SG: Kobe Bryant
SF: Lebron James
PF: Kevin Garnett
C: Akeem Olajuwon

 

Stockton
Kobe
Lebron
Duncan
Hakeem

Who's going to beat that?

Crazy D, crazy offense run by the most prolific point guard ever. Duncan and Hakeem in your front court is scary. And stockton's ability to hit 3's next to Kobe and Lebron.

This team will crush anybody on both ends.