<a href="http://m.staples.ca/sbdca/en_CA/cre/programs/grammarquiz/" target="_blank"><img src="http://m.staples.ca/sbdca/en_CA/cre/programs/grammarquiz/img/blogger.jpg" border="0" width="350" height="350" /></a><br /><span style="font-size: 12px;">Click image to open interactive version.</span> I will admit, I got a 94% because I missed one I totally misread... because I may have been going too fast.
Me am not taking this test. Everybody noes that grammar are overrated. Anybody whom thinks that their some sort of genius by scoring high is fooling hisself.
I took this test based on what I'd actually write, instead of what I know of grammar. And got an 81. I think there's definitely a difference between what we know to be correct on a grammar test here or on some standardized test. And how we actually write in life. For example, I use i.e. in cases where I'm suppose to use e.g. I almost never use "whom" or "could of".
I think I got the thing with "bored of" and "bored with" wrong, but didn't really understand the explanation given. Thought both were ok.
I agree. The variations might have a slight nuance of difference in meaning, but both seem correct to me. Which speaks to the larger problem of having a grammar quiz in the first place. Grammar is series of conventions, which evolve over time. It's not the Torah. There isn't a right answer, only a generally accepted one. I think learning the convention is important -- you have to learn the rules before it is meaningful to break them -- but quizzes like this fetishize conformity and squash the dynamism of the language.