Government overreach - UK, Brazil, China, EU, California authoritarian leftists going full 1984

lol. if that's the conclusion you want to draw . . .

 

Looks like you are focusing on the trees, and not the forest.

I'm pretty sure that my overall stance is accurate. The executive branch considers public input when creating regulations, and officials can be voted out if the public disagrees with their policies. In contrast, the Court only receives input from well-funded organizations through lawyers and is not subject to being voted out.

If the Court has ruled against what you wanted, you don't have much of a choice.

 

no, pretty sure the Supreme Court does not "regulate" or make "regulatory decisions."

 

Chevron. The Reagan EPA interpreted the Clean Air Act to ease regulations on emissions. Forty years ago, the Court ruled that agencies are best suited to make these decisions. That has now been overturned. The Court will decide if, for example, regulations should be eased, maintained, or created. They have effectively taken over the power to make regulatory decisions in areas of law that are ambiguous, which, by nature, always have some ambiguity.

 

Sportsmen’s Alliance Sues CDC on Dog-Import Rule
New CDC Rule Will Dismantle Sporting Dog Breeders Throughout Canada and Europe

https://sportsmensalliance.org/news/sportsmens-alliance-sues-cdc-on-dog-import-rule/

 

This is worse than spring training.

 

well we pretty much see that here on a daily basis

 

Word on the street is Canada is only sending it's worst dogs to America.

Krisit Noem's trigger finger getting itchy...