1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Google manipulating negative search terms about Hillary

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by RocketsLegend, Jun 9, 2016.

Tags:
  1. London'sBurning

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2002
    Messages:
    7,205
    Likes Received:
    4,817
    <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/fHMoDt3nSHs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
  2. across110thstreet

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2001
    Messages:
    12,855
    Likes Received:
    1,611
    What will be the follow up of this pop culture blog's discovery by entering words into a search field?

    What will happen from this?

    Not with a bang but a whimper...
     
  3. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,777
    Likes Received:
    20,430
    So it really wasn't manipulating search terms for her any differently than it does for anyone else.

    Too bad this wasn't interesting.
     
    Nook likes this.
  4. LosPollosHermanos

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    29,952
    Likes Received:
    13,966
    careful, it might still take a while to sink in for the conspiracy theorist right wingers.
     
  5. across110thstreet

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2001
    Messages:
    12,855
    Likes Received:
    1,611
    All you have to do is enter the name Hillary only and it refutes every single point in this video. "Hillary Ind" leads to indictment and "Hillary e" leads to the email scandal

    And Google blocks the word "crime" for almost any public figure as part of a set of words they deem inappropriate . Try a combo of "cr" after any famous celebrity (besides al Capone), and it will not show the word "crime". This applies to OJ Simpson, Bernie Madoff, Whitey Bulger, Ted Kaczynski, and many more.

    http://www.vox.com/2016/6/10/11903028/hillary-clinton-google-debunked

    Lol
     
  6. RocketsLegend

    RocketsLegend Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2015
    Messages:
    6,619
    Likes Received:
    1,529
    You do realize that this wasn't the case couple days ago, right? Answer this, why before this video was created the search terms for "Hillary ind.." came out as "Indiana", "India" and after this video was made and went viral then the search term was all of the sudden changed. Looks to me like Google went full panic mode and manually changed the results because they were caught red handed.
     
  7. across110thstreet

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2001
    Messages:
    12,855
    Likes Received:
    1,611
    Lol nope. You're flailing. Don't suggest to me what I realize.

    A couple of days ago it was the same. Today, the results for "Hillary Clinton ind" are the same.

    Read it and watch all over again. The entire video is based on a combo of her full name plus the phrases "ind" as well as "cr"

    The entire video has been refuted.

    Read the link, read my words. Read them and weep.
     
  8. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    Your link doesn't mention "indictment".
     
  9. across110thstreet

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2001
    Messages:
    12,855
    Likes Received:
    1,611
    What indictment?


    Try it yourself! "Hillary ind" leads to three and only three references to indictment.


    It's indicative that the people who search for this phrase are lazy.
     
  10. RocketsLegend

    RocketsLegend Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2015
    Messages:
    6,619
    Likes Received:
    1,529
    The results are different from before the video came out and after the video was posted.
     
  11. LosPollosHermanos

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    29,952
    Likes Received:
    13,966
    ^ this dude is crumbling before our eyes. The truth hurts so bad he is in denial lmao
     
  12. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    Not talking about the search results - just letting you know that the link does not mention "indictment".
     
  13. giddyup

    giddyup Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    20,466
    Likes Received:
    488
    Really? I tried this as soon as I saw the video the other day and get the exact results as described. Now a couple of days later I get a completely different set of auto-complete suggestions..
     
  14. RocketsLegend

    RocketsLegend Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2015
    Messages:
    6,619
    Likes Received:
    1,529
    They're all in denial.
     
  15. CometsWin

    CometsWin Breaker Breaker One Nine

    Joined:
    May 15, 2000
    Messages:
    28,028
    Likes Received:
    13,051
    You and giddy are why Snopes.com exists. Take a bow.
     
  16. across110thstreet

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2001
    Messages:
    12,855
    Likes Received:
    1,611

    Really.

    You got the results as described by the video, using the example "Hillary Clinton..."

    You didn't try using Hillary only, did you?
     
  17. hooroo

    hooroo Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    Messages:
    19,288
    Likes Received:
    1,908
    http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/...ays-google-directly-engaged-clinton-campaign/

     
    1 person likes this.
  18. RocketsLegend

    RocketsLegend Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2015
    Messages:
    6,619
    Likes Received:
    1,529
  19. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    81,372
    Likes Received:
    121,701
    In Google We Trust.
     

Share This Page