Sigh. Where's the mac version google!!!!???!! Hrmmm. If chrome OS runs on intel, does this mean one could load chrome onto intel-powered macs?
So basically your cpu wont run without an internet connection? Everything is stored online? hmmmm.......
I found this particularly interesting: Interesting that it's actually a Linux distribution. The key for Google will be compatibility. How will it play with Windows-compatible drivers/software? If it wants to succeed, it's going to have to attempt at being 100% compatible with everything.
Reading on, using Chrome as an OS is actually a really, really cool idea. Each tab in Chrome is a separate process. Why not treat it like a task manager for an operating system? Each tab is akin to a task on your taskbar for Windows. I'm still interested to see how they implement the file system (I can't watch the Youtube video at work), but running applications should be just like having different tabs in Chrome and that's a really cool idea. And, of course, I'm always a fan of open source.
Facebook dislike add-on? There are actually still some sites that won't run properly in Chrome still. I want this if I can get a netbook next friday.
Question .. . . While I know folx hates Microsoft but Will we be better served by having everyone on different OSes? Rocket River
In a sense but . . . inconsistancy is not Programmers having to write the same program for MAC, LINUX, WINDOWS, GOOGLE = 4 times the work for the same program just an example Rocket River
Will it be a LINUX-BASED Google OS, or a GOOGLE-BASED Linux OS? Can't wait until MocoSoft attempts to buy Google because of their recent success.
Linux is linux. The underlying components that interface with the hardware are all the same across every distribution from RedHat to Ubuntu. That interface will be the same for Google's distribution, so the drivers for Linux will work on it. That said, I'm not sure Linux's compatibility is up there with Windows' but it's getting pretty high and popularity of a new Linux distribution (especially Google's) and their invasion into the OS market via Netbooks could springboard Linux up to near-Windows levels. Linux has been gaining momentum the last few years, mostly in server applications, and I can see it gaining more in the home consumer markets. They tried back in early 2008 for $44.8 billion. They were rejected.
Microsoft can't afford Google - nobody can at this point. Their market cap is $181B. They could only try to propose a merger but shareholders would never agree. And there is no such thing as a "XXX-based Linux OS". Linux is the core of the operating system, but you can build anything around it. GCOS is going to be Linux as much as Android and Palm's WebOS are Linux. Both are built on top of a Linux core, but at the end are very different platforms.
QFT. It's similar I think to the UNIX underpinnings of OS X. Based on it, but the two are not the same.