1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Good Guys vs. Knuckle Heads

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by gifford1967, Nov 5, 2009.

Tags:
?

Scrappy good guys that never go all the way vs. D-bag champions?

  1. Scrappy Good Guys

    62.3%
  2. D-Bag Champions

    37.7%
  1. SamFisher

    SamFisher Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    61,826
    Likes Received:
    41,301
    read any of tinman's posts re: Maxwell.

    Championships go a LONG way.

    Look at A-Rod.
     
  2. joesr

    joesr Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2008
    Messages:
    6,772
    Likes Received:
    115
    Nice

    Whats the point of routing for a team that doesn't win? (assuming you said doesnt win champs)

    Its fine going thru slump years only to get better later though.
     
  3. napalm06

    napalm06 Huge Flopping Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    26,927
    Likes Received:
    30,540
    If I may get on a soapbox for a second, I think we sometimes forget what sports is all about, and why it originated. It's for entertainment, sportsmanship, and comraderie (sp?). America has such a rich past time of sports because of what sports represent. Our modern generation would rather turn it into a cocky, attention seeking, money-glorying show, but I think that's straying from the roots of sports.

    That being said, good guys any day. Sorry if I sound like an old man. :cool:
     
  4. joesr

    joesr Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2008
    Messages:
    6,772
    Likes Received:
    115
    I think you miss the main one. Competition.
     
  5. Hayesfan

    Hayesfan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2006
    Messages:
    10,910
    Likes Received:
    374
    Scrappy by default implies competition. I enjoy watching the Rockets play much more than I enjoy watching the Lakers. Why? Because 90% of the Lakers team I wouldn't bother with on a personal level... they are cocky and most of them think they deserve special treatment. At least that is the image they portray.

    I don't want my kids, if I should have any one day, to think that they are entitled to anything that they haven't worked for. As athletes they are idolized, at any level, they are looked up to by those who are on the same path behind them. It is more entertaining for me to watch a group of people work together to complete a task and win a game then to see one person try to do it all themselves or whine after every play for 82 games.

    The team that win the championship, like the Lakers, don't give a flying hoot during the season.. they go through the motions giving just enough effort to win the games they have to... and relying on one guy to pull them through. The Cinderella teams are the one that everyone gets behind, so that even if they don't win in the end, the path to getting there is just as exciting and entertaining.
     
    1 person likes this.
  6. TheGreat

    TheGreat Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Messages:
    5,747
    Likes Received:
    423
    A-Rod baby, not a d-bag, just the man.
     
  7. LCII

    LCII Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    8,609
    Likes Received:
    395
    :rolleyes: @ everyone who's picking good guys

    It's not like there weren't any D-bags on the 94' and 95' championship teams.

    The thing is when ur team is playing as an elite unit and wins championships you can absolutely forgive them for being douchebags.
     
  8. Hayesfan

    Hayesfan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2006
    Messages:
    10,910
    Likes Received:
    374
    Here's the thing... the question wasn't if all championship teams have d-bags... the question was which do you enjoy more... a team you can root for and is likeable or a team that you can't stand but wins you a championship

    There isn't a right or wrong answer :) It's personal preference.
     
  9. LCII

    LCII Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    8,609
    Likes Received:
    395
    Fine. But I'd still pick the champions. Championships are everything in this league. Imagine a Houston Rockets franchise without their 94' and 95' chips. *shudder*
     
  10. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    Why? A championship on its own isn't that important to me. The only satisfaction I'd get from it is if I felt they got there playing the right way, and they earned the respect and admiration of their supporters and opponents. That's something I can be proud of.

    If its just a bunch of unlikeable jerks that won a championship, and they didn't do it in a manner I can respect, it doesn't mean much to me.
     
  11. baller4life315

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    3,029
    Speaking as a proud Steelers fan, I can 100% assure you that Big Ben is one of the biggest dicks you will ever meet off the field and when the cameras aren't running. Hell, pretty much everybody knows he's a tool. Do I care? Of course not because I love this team too much to not support them and relish in the fact that he brought me two championships. Conversely, even if he wasn't winning I'd still support him and the team. Winning championships is what being a fan is all about though, so as long as he's doing that I can tolerate pretty much anything.
     
    #31 baller4life315, Nov 5, 2009
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2009
  12. saleem

    saleem Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2001
    Messages:
    30,273
    Likes Received:
    14,712
    Knuckle heads don't win championships,but the bottom line is to win one. It doesn't matter if they are nice or not.

    Lots of guys hated Vernon,and it's true he was responsible for his own dismissal from the team,no matter who provoked him.However no one can deny that he deserved an NBA championship,and that we couldn't have won without him playing a big role on a team that believed it could win.
     
  13. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    I'm not saying that all the players on the team have to be angels. But if none of them have any redeeming qualities character-wise, they've lost me emotionally.
     
  14. Easy

    Easy Boban Only Fan
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Messages:
    38,176
    Likes Received:
    29,656
    If you only care about winning and not the players, how is it different from playing fantasy league?
     
  15. Tom Bombadillo

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    29,091
    Likes Received:
    23,991
    Little bit of both...
     
  16. SuperStar

    SuperStar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2008
    Messages:
    5,057
    Likes Received:
    70
    Douche bags can be likable. Yeah that dude is a douche bag BUT HE'S OUR DOUCHEBAG! (see Ron Artest)
     
  17. ibm

    ibm Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Messages:
    8,600
    Likes Received:
    60
    this.

    glad the majority of clutchfans who voted got it "right". :)

    any portland fans here? do you enjoy your current team more or is it the one 6-7 years ago (i.e. the jail blazers)? really want to know.
     
  18. bullardfan

    bullardfan なんでやねん

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3,597
    Likes Received:
    101
    this would make a good thread.

    1. derrick fisher
    2. derrick fisher
    3. carlos boozer
    4. kevin garnett
    5. andrew bynum (the fake AB)
    coach mike brown
     
  19. LCII

    LCII Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Messages:
    8,609
    Likes Received:
    395
    :rolleyes: A championship team, for the most part, will play the 'right' way. They're a beauty to watch, offensively and defensively. Who cares if they are douchebags off the court, or even douchebags on the court (maybe just competitiveness?). Fans pay good money to see their team win, not be angels.

    The only way a player earns my respect and admiration is by their performance on the court, showing their desire to win, showing how competitive they are and how they are willing to do anything for their team to win, not how much of a good guy they are. That would just be an added bonus.

    This is basically a 'do ends justify means?' issue and i say for a NBA championship the ends do justify the means.

    Final point: The majority of the winners in this league are all sort of douchebags in some way or some form. (MJ, Pippen, Kobe, Shaq, KG)
    Yet thousands of people love them for being winners and being champions. Its hard to find an ultra competitive person who also isn't somewhat of a douchebag.
     
    #39 LCII, Nov 6, 2009
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2009
  20. pmac

    pmac Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    8,404
    Likes Received:
    3,266
    :confused:

    Anyway, Northside Storm got it right. I guarantee you Utah Jazz fans love and respect their team, they especially love Sloan and his pushing/flopping/cheating style of basketball. We love Scola but I've heard from a few fans of other teams that they think he's one of the dirtiest players in the game, Jazz level dirty.

    I learned a long time ago not to judge someone based on what you hear. So, when it comes to topics like character, i find the discussion irrelevant. I don't think any of us have sufficient evidence to support a claim on the majority of athletes' character.

    So, it's not that I would really like the championship team players better. I don't like any players, personality wise. I would watch artificially intelligent robots play basketball if it were entertaining. I love this team as whole, as an organization, as a Houston team and that will NEVER change. I think that's about as far away from bandwagoning you can get.

    EDIT: I think we can use our team as a reference for the scrappy team. Can anyone name a championship team that they would not have supported had they previously been a fan of the team?
     

Share This Page