lol. In other words, either you can't comprehend what you read or you give up. Figures. Thanks for playing, better luck next alt.
Your 43rd consecutive meaningless post in this thread. What's with all the nut up, sack up, doody, dinosaur dung, and balls talk? Are you unable to post without referencing fecal matter or questioning someone's manhood or is that just part of the schtick these days? It's really rather ineffective.
Why would I want to look as foolish as you have in this thread? My point isn't yours. My point is the hypocrite you are (though I realize you are a joke account) by being ok with using a special needs child for political points. You really should be ashamed of yourself. Also...'nut up or shut up'. lol@wanting to talk tough on the Internet. Maybe you aren't one of the regulars' alts. Most of them are grown adults.
So what you are saying is you prefer your giggles to be derived from snide remarks at the expense of a handicapped baby. That's what you found effective.... Wow
Just like I thought. You do realize that what you and I think. about Palin or Basso are just our opinions and not facts. The facts are we supposedly both share the same opinion on the attacks on handicapped kids and their parents. The difference is you don't have the guts to address the issue knowing it's likely to continue to happen if folks continue to tolerate it.
The remarks aren't made at the expense of the child but rather at the expense of the child's idiotic mother for putting her handicapped child into play as a political issue. It's an easy distinction.
QUOTE=CometsWin]The remarks aren't made at the expense of the child but rather at the expense of the child's idiotic mother for putting her handicapped child into play as a political issue. It's an easy distinction.[/QUOTE] Then why didn't he use sarah palins name? You do realize that you are defending someone who passed judgement on the OP's commitment to his son and also used a derogatory term that is as offensive to that community as a racial slur would be to any of the respective races. Then he went on to basically say trig was lucky to have a stupid mother because stupid people make the best parents for DS kids. All this doesn't matter to you and the herd because you are too worried about your popularity or jepoardizing your position or support in an unwinnable debate. Sam and a few other lost souls pissed on an entire community of handicapped people to keep face with internet friends or they are just plain stupid. Sam has even said this online community has validated his stupid statements with some worthless rep points. If those points were stocks they just nose dived.
Then why didn't he use sarah palins name? You do realize that you are defending someone who passed judgement on the OP's commitment to his son and also used a derogatory term that is as offensive to that community as a racial slur would be to any of the respective races. Then he went on to basically say trig was lucky to have a stupid mother because stupid people make the best parents for DS kids. All this doesn't matter to you and the herd because you are too worried about your popularity or jepoardizing your position or support in an unwinnable debate. Sam and a few other lost souls pissed on an entire community of handicapped people to keep face with internet friends or they are just plain stupid. Sam has even said this online community has validated his stupid statements with some worthless rep points. If those points were stocks they just nose dived.[/QUOTE] I'm not defending anything. You claim people are making fun of a handicapped child, as if any political persuasion has a corner on handicapped family members, and I explained why you have it wrong. I'm not part of any herd and claiming that anyone that disagrees with you is part of some concerted group effort is just lame. It's easy to recognize that Sam's posts are often insightful and funny while basso's are not. There's more history in this debate than you're aware of so don't pretend you understand the rationale behind what's posted.
I like that you keep going with the weak reversals. Consistent since the first post. Here, I can do it too! You don't have guts (or should I use balls? Perhaps nuts? I'm not sure what the Granville Internet Tough vocabulary prefers here) to address the real offensive issue of using special needs kids for political points, knowing the OP is likely to continue if you continue to tolerate it. Isn't that fun? So enough sidestepping Granville. What do you think about using this topic for political brownie points? Are you okay with it? Because the OP did the same thing with the deaths of US soldiers at Ft.Hood. So he gets no benefit of the doubt. And yet, shamefully, you don't seem to have a problem with that. I mean, you haven't called it out at all! Oh, wait - I mean, you don't have the cajones to call it out! So sad. If you don't have anything to address the point and show me you aren't a hypocrite (and not just some joke account), don't waste my time.
You don't grasp the concept that we don't share the same opinion do you? And where we do share the same opinion you sold your soul for status on an internet board or position in an unwinnable debate. You want me to call someone out who I don't have issue with? You are clueless.
lol. how is that again? Is this your stock troll that you keep throwing around hoping it will stick? I've seen you pull this out time and time again in this thread desperate to make it work. In any case, I believe I said: And you failed at that. Try again.
