Gay Rights Movement

Not in my opinion, I would be ok with a civil union though.

 

civil unions deny federal benefits to loving couples who otherwise want to spend the rest of their committed lives together and perhaps even start a family. (this can happen biologically these days with the help of egg /sperm donors and surrogates)

that doesn't sound like equal protection under the laws and Constitution of this country.

I'm not trying to force that on anyone. I, along with many of my faithful/religious/spiritual/God fearing friends agree that loving couples, no matter their sexual orientation , should not be denied those rights.

 

big t is gay, leave him alone

 

I'm a happy person, if that's what you mean. If you're suggesting that I like to pork men in the rear, then you're wrong.

 

Fact: 100% of males who fear/hate homosexuals or homosexual behavior are closet homosexuals.

 

Ok what if one of those people in that pic is genetically female?

 

I'm a straight dude and personally the more gay men there are the less competition for me. One thing that I'm not sure hasn't been mentioned yet, isn't homosexuality the most humane form of population control? The planet will eventually be overburdened(if not already) by human overpopulation.

 

What???
I like watching Charles Bronson put bullets in people
does that mean I should approve of Murder?
hehehehehehee
Charles Bronson . . . hehehehehe

SMH

Rocket River

 

So now you're comparing a victimless act to a murder.

 

I don't think you are homosexual, or hateful, or a bigot, at all, no.

I do think a comment like that shows immaturity on the level of a middle school child.

straight people like us don't have the benefit of the doubt to presume what goes on behind closed doors of other heterosexual couples' homes.

but to take the conversation there the you way you do and constantly focus on the anal fetish shows your lack of understanding of what entails a loving, committed couple.

and it tells more about you than the gay and lesbian couples that will eventually be able to marry each other.

 

i knew it! you're a bottom.

 

Spoiler

 

^^^you chose a picture that typoed surprise

sloppy sloppy. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison would make short work of you.

hey, let's see how their arguments are going---

GAME OVER DOMA

 

I've still yet to hear a rational, logical argument against gay marriage. And no, religious arguments do not fall under the category of rational/logic (If I wanted superstitious, that would be valid).

 

lulz in case you missed it, "sex" is also "typoed"

 

Pretty much made your point didn't he?

 

lulz in case you missed it, but irony and sarcasm, with a light touch of ridicule leading to a more serious point is also "typoed".

typical non-response to historical statement presaging fall of repressive and antiquated law. RACK IT UP

 

Marriage equality

 

No gay gene has been found. It is not biological/

 

Wow, an existentialist view of Malthusian theory.