Gamespot Fires Reviewer Due to Negative Review?

um, what's wrong with a 8.8 for TP? you do realize that 8.8 out of 10 is still considered a great game?

what did you expect, a 10 or something? 8.8 is not that much a difference from 9.3 or 9.5 or whatever. I don't think there's anything wrong at all with the TP score...I might personally give it a 9.0 or something but not much higher than that

as for Tony Hawk, I can't say since I never played it myself

 

You somewhat missed my point. I've never played Twilight Princess, much like RC Cola, but I've heard others complain that the score was too low which alerted me to Gamespot's review and system in general. I have never relied on Gamespot for reviews, but I have heard other gamers say that Gamespot generally reviews games lower than other sites or publications. My question centers around whether their reviewers do this based on the actual game or to make some sort of statement to the industry. I.e. lowering their score in comparison to other sites in the name of going against what the other reviewers are saying.

From www.penny-arcade.com directly, they said as much on their website as a commentary to Gerstmann's firing:

"Jeff Gerstmann is no stranger to controversy. In general terms, Gamespot can be relied upon to give high-profile games scores which are slightly lower than their counterparts elsewhere. It's almost as though there is an algorithm in place there to correct the heady rush associated with cracking open an anticipated new title."

In short, I'm not challenging the Twilight Princess or Tony Hawk scores, I'm just questioning whether the scores were what they rightfully deserved in his mind or inflated or deflated in contrast to other sites or publications.

So calm down, I didn't care what they gave Twilight Princess and yes I do know what great scores are. I don't get angry when others don't like a game as much as I do. It's all objective or opinion based and everyone has different tastes in games.

 

gamespot is/was one of my lesser trusted places for reviews...i dont see how them getting new blood could be any worse.

 

their image has certainly taken a big hit from this, whether its true or not.

 

Very true. A 9 on Gamespot would be equal to a 9.6 on IGN more or less. Definitely could be the case. At least I hope it is because my alternative is very unfortunate if it is the case.

I suppose why I was going along my lines of thinking is because Gamespot comes off as negative and arrogant a bit to me during some of their reviews. Listening to some of their reviews of games, you would think that the game is about to receive a 3 by the way they are talking and it ends up with a 6 or 7. Kane and Lynch being a prime example.

Or it may have been that they totally disregarded Street Fighter...... The bastards.

Definitely possible also. Credibility is everything in the video game industry. Especially when it comes to whose opinions gamers trust. I personally listen to what GameTrailers.com and EGM have to say about a game, but mostly I'm looking at how they describe the gameplay mechanics and their experiences with the game. So in actuality, I'm taking what they say with a grain of salt and just listening to their initial opinions.

 

Remember the different time periods in which he reviewed those games. You are using flawed logic.

 

A shame, since I liked Gamespot as one of the 'group' of sites I used to check out reviews.

 

Net media whoring will continue to be a problem until there are more ways to make money out of websites.

I also used Gamespot as a measuring stick. What are some reliable game sites you guys trust?

 

IGN and Gametrailers give thorough reviews...I know its only two sites, but I think you can get a good understanding of any game from both of their reviews.

 

IGN's scores tend to go a little high though; not 'OMG I'm Playing a Video Game!! FIVE out of FIVE' level like GamePro, but still.

It's one of the reasons I tend to go with the sites that collect multiple reviews.

 

I'm not going to touch the 8.8 review. I'll let the Zelda fans lose sleep over that.

As for the firing, Eidos did what any publisher does, put up empty threats due to unsatisfactory content. As a result, they get put in bad publicity even though other publishers do the exact same thing. And remember, Gertsmann was the editor-in-chief so he's pretty high up the Gamespot ladder. Still, there is still too much speculation to see what exactly happened.

Of course corruption is pretty much everywhere nowadays. Just look at big media and the US government.

 

Holy spit that made me laugh!

 

The only sad things i could get out of this is realizing how many of you actually care about online review.

Some of you should realize that any review is bias, even fan review. There are many fans that are paid to post on gaming forum and make fan review to boost the popularity of the games.

If you want to know how good a game is, download the demo and play for yourself. Don't let MS and other rich company manipulate what game you should buy.

 

what is your OE name?

 

I don't think most people would actually trust a fan review over anything else. Not sure why you would think that to be the case.

There is, however, a problem with a more 'professional' site seemingly under such control by the advertisers/publishers of games. Of course folks have had such concerns, but to see such blatant abuse is worth discussing.

 

There are many fan site forum that produce quality review that is way superior to that of "professional site". I'm not talking about those "general gamer" that post review on gamespot. Fan review is way better due to the fact that they get the beta test the game, and actually contribute lots time and money into it. They know what they are talking about unlike "professional site" reviewer which just spend a few hour at most fooling around without a damn clue what to do.

Things about review being manipulated shouldn't be that shocking. A few year back, I have beta tested a game and have seen leaked review score (not the actually review, but the score and quote that is simply LOL) 1 month pior to the game being finish. Is just like rocket game commenter which is clearly bias toward rocket in ever play during game. And they are professional .


I would highly doubt they would keep their job if they were to give honest opinion during game, just like most fan that are posting here during game time.

 

Okei here is a comparison of the guy that got fire from a "fan" review.

Ironically, it happen to be the game I'm currently playing, Unreal Tournament 3.

Gamespot UT3 video review by that guy that got fired:

<embed id="mymovie" width="432" height="355" flashvars="paramsURI=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Egamespot%2Ecom%2Fpages%2Fvideo%5Fplayer%2Fproteus%5Fxml%2Ephp%3Fadseg%3D%26adgrp%3D%26sid%3D6183310%26pid%3D928117%26mb%3D%26onid%3D12860%26nc%3D1196505016328%26embedded%3D1%26showWatermark%3D0%26autoPlay%3D0" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" quality="high" name="mymovie" src="http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/cne_flash/production/media_player/proteus/gs/proteus_embed.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"/>

Fan (competitive player) review:

http://pwnage.tv/On-Demand/videodirectlink/UT3-Review/