1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Foster's "Incompletion" Should Have Been a TD.

Discussion in 'Houston Texans' started by rockets934life, Nov 9, 2010.

  1. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,532
    Likes Received:
    5,535
    It's a dumb rule; especially given what constitutes a TD when crossing the goal line - that requires only the ball to cross. You can immediately fumble it and it wouldn't matter. That's wildly inconsistent. If a player has possesion *in the end zone* it should be a TD, period.

    That was a really big call; really, really big. Changed the entire game. A 24-14 lead (and subsequently, 27-14 - the Texans took the second half kick-off and drove for another FG) makes it an entirely different game.

    Up 6, Kubiak probably kicks the FG (instead of going for it at the SD 17) to stretch it 30-21 and keep it a two-score game. And keep in mind, after the Foster failed 4th down, Jackson intercepted Rivers. Unfortunately, that's the moment Kubiak got really dumb and went pass, run, pass, pass (sack). Up 30-21, that probably would have been run, run, run. Even if you go 3-and-out, you've drained nearly 2 additional minutes off the clock.
     
  2. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,989
    Likes Received:
    19,932
    Yeah, that touchdown would've turned that 4th and 1 QB sneak failboat into an almost for-sure Rackers FG.

    Texans win by 1, everyone is happy.

    Instead... :mad:

    And if you believe Arian was "diving" for the goalline, I don't know what play you're watching, but it's not this one. It's his fault, he admitted it. Just tuck and roll, guys.
     
  3. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,532
    Likes Received:
    5,535
    No, no - I'm taling about the *first* failed fourth down conversion, when Foster was stuffed. Schaub's fourth down fail was from the SD 34 - it was prime "go for it" territory there. No way he tries a 51-yard FG at the time.
     
  4. rockets934life

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    15,312
    Likes Received:
    249
    I agree, tuck and roll...Arian made a big mistake there but he wasn't diving, he was extending the ball to make sure it crossed the plane. Once he did that, possession was established and play should have been dead at the goal line. So confusing, not suprised the refs missed it, but dam they need to get a uniformed rule for all those types of catches.
     
  5. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390
    It wouldn't have been a fumble either. Ground can't cause a fumble. And the ball was not coming out of his mitt until he hit it on the ground.
     
  6. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,989
    Likes Received:
    19,932
    You're right, there's so many screwups I can't keep them straight. :mad:
     
  7. Summer Song Giver

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2000
    Messages:
    6,343
    Likes Received:
    209
    Arian's TD/No TD call not withstanding, where the hell have the down-field shots like the one above been in our offense? Everything this year has been playaction with one option or a designed quick short throw, absolutely no attacking of the defense deep anymore.
     
  8. Uprising

    Uprising Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2000
    Messages:
    43,076
    Likes Received:
    6,603
    That, and the FAIL boot....reverse...whatever they call it where Schaub spins out away from everyone else has not worked this season. Teams have caught on...stop wasting plays.
     
  9. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    It's a confusing rule, but the VP of officiating is the arbiter of whether it's the right call or not. If he says it's a bad call, it's a bad call.
     
  10. Depressio

    Depressio Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2009
    Messages:
    6,416
    Likes Received:
    366
    Not really. We were in field goal range several times after that "touchdown" but we had to go for it because we were down by more than 3. If we had only been down by 2, we could've booted one.

    Would Kubes have still gone for it instead of opting for, say, a 50-yard FG? Maybe. He's stupid enough.
     
  11. Summer Song Giver

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2000
    Messages:
    6,343
    Likes Received:
    209

    That's the one I was referring to, the naked boot with only one receiver the boot side of the field, it's usually good for 6 yds or Schaub will throw it away, the success of that play has greatly diminished probably because it is run too often.

    I'd like to see more screens, they ran one last week to Foster for sizable gains, it is the first screen I remember in the Kubiak era, could use some more. And mix in a down field shot every now and then.
     
  12. BucMan55

    BucMan55 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    4,736
    Likes Received:
    62

    Most of the screens we try to run end up in throw aways because the pulling linemen don't chip and the nonpulling linemen throw "lookout" blocks.


    "Lookout Matt!!"
     
  13. REEKO_HTOWN

    REEKO_HTOWN I'm Rich Biiiiaaatch!

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    47,507
    Likes Received:
    19,638
    Even If we would have gotten a TD, Kubiak and the Defense would have found a way to lose.
     
  14. rrj_gamz

    rrj_gamz Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    15,595
    Likes Received:
    198
  15. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,989
    Likes Received:
    19,932
    Actually, the former VP of officiating's opinion means about as much as yours or mine does.
     
  16. BucMan55

    BucMan55 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    4,736
    Likes Received:
    62

    As long as it helps get plays like this legal I'm all for it.


    As a Buccaneer fan the "Bert Emanuel rule" hurt like hell after it was implemented. But ya know what, how many countless receptions have counted properly since it changed for the better of the league?? As long as we get an Arian Foster or Calvin Johnson rule, the NFL will be a better place.


    Bert Emanuel play for those not sure what I am talking about:

    <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tBLBDh6iNxA?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tBLBDh6iNxA?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now