1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

For those who thought McCain won the first debate...

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by FranchiseBlade, Sep 27, 2008.

Tags:
  1. KingCheetah

    KingCheetah Atomic Playboy

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    59,079
    Likes Received:
    52,756
    This post is uncalled for Surfguy is hardly an Obamabot -- you've been around long enough to know better.

    Your posts have been a bit of a joke since the election heated up anyway.
     
  2. Refman

    Refman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2002
    Messages:
    13,674
    Likes Received:
    312
    "What are we going to do, sit down with him? He'll say 'We are going to bomb Israel off the map.' and we'll say 'No you're not.' Please."

    Pure gold.
     
  3. BigBenito

    BigBenito Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    7,355
    Likes Received:
    175
    pgabriel agrees with you, but I'm still flummoxed.
     
  4. ROCKET RICH NYC

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 1999
    Messages:
    1,670
    Likes Received:
    13
    I've actually posted less.
     
  5. bigtexxx

    bigtexxx Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    26,980
    Likes Received:
    2,365
    McCain's experience just humiliated Obama regarding foreign policy. The only ones who could disagree with this are the Obama drones
     
  6. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    I agree with both McCain and Obama on this, but thought the way McCain handled it was pretty unbecoming. Obama is right that sometimes you should have executive-level meetings without preconditions. (Say for example, if Iran was considered an immediate threat to an ally, and the President could get an audience with Ahmedinijad or Khamenei, they should meet.) McCain is also right that typically you want to get concessions before having executive-level meetings, and that secretary-level and ambassador-level meetings are preferable until those concessions are received.

    I don't really think that either really disagree with either of these points. The distinctions are purely rhetorical.
     
  7. Spacemoth

    Spacemoth Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    9,911
    Likes Received:
    4,699
    I think a major and legitimate point of separation between the two is an issue of how to prioritize spending in the wake of a revenue shortage (as we will undoubtedly see in the future).

    McCain said during the debate that he would prioritize over everything, 1. Defense, and 2. Veterans healthcare. The rest of the debate he seemed only to talk about how he would cut government spending on pork.

    Obama seemed to mention his priorities as 1. saving money by getting out of Iraq, 2. infrastructure spending (roads, and power, and other commodities Houstonians did not have these past weeks), 3. healthcare, if not universal, then for as many people as possible, 4. funding to support cost-effective energy solutions in the forms of fuel-efficient cars and offshore drilling.

    Although these issues do not necessarily have to be at odds, the way they were debating it made it seem like it. So if you put defense at a higher premium than the other issues--and to be fair McCain defended his reasoning by saying that we would have to go back in if we left now--then vote McCain. I feel pretty confident in saying that the military won't be getting any more blank checks with a Democrat in the White House.
     

Share This Page