1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Fischer: Rockets interested in reaching long term deal with Fred VanVleet

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by OremLK, Jan 31, 2025.

?

Should the Rockets sign FVV to a long-term deal?

  1. Yes (at any semi-reasonable price)

    77 vote(s)
    28.7%
  2. Maybe (only on a team-friendly deal)

    136 vote(s)
    50.7%
  3. No

    55 vote(s)
    20.5%
  1. Newlin

    Newlin Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2015
    Messages:
    8,788
    Likes Received:
    11,154
    It’s good that they are talking. The Rockets need to find out NOW what Fred wants to do. Knowing what Fred wants to do helps the Rockets in deciding what needs to be done now before the trade deadline.

    Something we don’t really know is how the Rockets view Reed Sheppard. I think the Rockets drafted Reed with hopes he would replace Fred. The Rockets may still be high on Reed, but they may feel more comfortable if they had Fred locked up on a reasonable and tradeable contract which would give Reed time to develop.
     
  2. Reeko

    Reeko Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2017
    Messages:
    52,192
    Likes Received:
    143,587
  3. mac_got_this

    mac_got_this Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Messages:
    11,238
    Likes Received:
    9,659
    I used to think he could be our Kyle Lowry it was at least onthe level of prime Kyle Kowry but I was duped. FVV is solid but he’s not as good as Kyle Lowry
     
    gfab-babyboi likes this.
  4. OkayAyeReloaded

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2010
    Messages:
    4,879
    Likes Received:
    7,333
    Yes, work a team-friendly deal and resign him, he's a great long-term mentor. Let Amen and Reed develop and he can move to a reduced role over time based on who runs the offense the best.
     
    the11mingdynasty and Plowman like this.
  5. Plowman

    Plowman Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 1999
    Messages:
    13,097
    Likes Received:
    14,826
    I always assumed his contract would be dealt in a big deal.
    But, he's glue...for awhile.. 2 yrs/ 43 mil..no more.
     
    #45 Plowman, Jan 31, 2025
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2025
  6. Bryant2108

    Bryant2108 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2014
    Messages:
    1,148
    Likes Received:
    1,391
    I'm ok with this for something short term - decline the option next year, and give him 2 years at MV (which is def not 43 mil for 15 and 6, on bad shooting)

    But, only if his minutes are reduced (maybe even the 6th man, continue to mentor the youngsters), and he doesn't block the progression of our youngsters. I know Ime trusts him, but in the final minute yesterday, he had a bad TO and 2 bad 3 point misses.
     
  7. HoustonSportsAddict

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2024
    Messages:
    1,362
    Likes Received:
    2,294
    I would riot at the capital if this is the extension. FVV was never worth 40 million plus even in his prime
     
  8. Houston77

    Houston77 COOKIES AND CAKE, MY TEAM BAKED!
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2018
    Messages:
    7,656
    Likes Received:
    19,178
    I’m guessing it would be something like 3/90 with a team option. That would synch him up well with Brooks’ contract, which falls off in a couple of seasons. Wouldn’t hate it, but I far prefer the deferential FVV to the one we saw last night.
     
  9. Rocketeer

    Rocketeer Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 1999
    Messages:
    3,180
    Likes Received:
    1,597
    If the Rockets believe in Reed Shepherd, I'm ok with extending Fred with the idea that Reed will someday be our starter.
     
  10. Qan

    Qan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2012
    Messages:
    5,014
    Likes Received:
    7,190
    No thanks. He isn't worth 3/90 as a bench player next season.
     
  11. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,429
    Likes Received:
    11,673
    I'm fine with FVV as backup PG to Amen on a two-year deal at something reasonable that won't hinder the Rockets ability to make roster and salary decisions.
     
    Plowman likes this.
  12. tehG l i d e

    tehG l i d e Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    27,293
    Likes Received:
    20,872
    Everything I've heard from Fred in interviews is that he plans to stay in Houston long term. I think he takes a team-friendly contract and agrees to get moved to the bench when it comes time. He would be the perfect back up PG on a contending team.
     
    Mathloom, Y2JT and Tom Bombadillo like this.
  13. OremLK

    OremLK Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    20,070
    Likes Received:
    17,677
    If the annual pay declines over time like Dillon's contract, I would be okay with 3 or maybe even 4 years (depending on the actual dollar value). I suspect he will be looking for that kind of contract since this may be his last chance to get a deal approaching 9 figures. After this it's just MLE/vet min for him in all likelihood.

    Something like this would be ideal if he'd take it:
    Year 1: $28M
    Year 2: $24M
    Year 3: $20M
    Year 4 (maybe a team option?): $20M
     
  14. pmac

    pmac Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    8,395
    Likes Received:
    3,255
    Yep. I think an opt-in with a lower role player level salary moving forward after that works for both sides.

    As it has been mentioned, that opens the door for Jalen/Amen/Reed to take on larger roles as they develop. It also, makes him a better trade asset as his salary drops. I honestly, think this was the plan from the start. You basically build in role players for when the young guys are ready.
     
  15. Corrosion

    Corrosion Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    10,020
    Likes Received:
    13,240


    I think the majority of fans expected this.


    There are few if any upgrades available in FA or even trade where the cost would be prohibitive in terms of assets.
    The other issue with free agency is not having cap space to offer - Letting FVV walk and renouncing all your FA's nets you ~$19.2m with 5 open roster spots a glaring hole at PG, backup C and the 3rd guard spot though the T-MLE could help fill one.


    The cost really does have to come down, maybe exercise the option for next year then an extension for 2 years, with a descending salary similar to Brooks current deal.


    Doing this means you don't have to renounce your FA's retaining their bird rights and salary slots above the cap - you have nonessential pieces and salary to deal.


    I do want them to try and upgrade the position ..... doesn't need to be an overly dynamic player but one with a high A/T ratio & above average shooting & defense but in the event that fails, I'm content with FVV as the short term solution - on the right contract,
     
    theDude likes this.
  16. theDude

    theDude Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    3,769
    Likes Received:
    5,398
    It’s much ado about nothing. Any new deal, no matter what the price tag, keeps us over the cap. So there will be no free agency or big moves. We will probably try to re-sign Adams and maybe Tate. They could pick up Landale’s option as roster filler and tradable salary.

    The main point for extending Fred is to lower his salary to re-sign our own players and stay under the tax. If we don’t do that and just pick up his option, we are against the tax and have to let Adams, Tate, etc. walk and we’re stuck signing minimum players. This will allow us to keep some quality bench depth and have significant enough salaries to facilitate a trade later, if necessary.
     
  17. Will

    Will Clutch Crew
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    5,271
    Likes Received:
    10,142
    Apologies to the haters, but I freaking love this guy. Cool head, high IQ, exemplary work ethic, and fits perfectly with our youngs. He makes nearly all the right decisions, and when he's out, the quality of our possessions drops precipitously. When he can't play anymore, I expect to see him coaching at a high level.
     
  18. Tom Bombadillo

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    Messages:
    29,091
    Likes Received:
    23,991
    Facts. He is as responsible as anyone for everything that has gone well in Houston, including the development of Alperen and JG.

    I hope we can give him a lot of years for lower dollars.

    Fred is the man.
     
    Mathloom and TAB like this.
  19. carl_herrera

    carl_herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2023
    Messages:
    715
    Likes Received:
    1,909
    I would be totally shocked if we gave FVV guaranteed money past year 1 (i.e., past 2025-26).

    For better or worse, in the base case there will be no room on our cap sheet for FVV (or Dillon) on >MLE salaries once Jabari and Tari's extensions hit in 25/26, then Amen's hits the year after.

    Sure we might make a trade by that point... but that would be for someone else making a big salary.

    Yes Tilman might decide to pay the tax at some point in the future if this team is a title contender... but he's not gonna sign off on setting us up to be in the tax as the glide path.
     
  20. TheBeastSystem

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2020
    Messages:
    752
    Likes Received:
    589
    since the rockets are a poor shooting team it is very important that they create points by having possession/shot attempts differential in their favor

    that means outrebounding the opponent and keeping the rockets turnovers at a minimum

    fred one of the best in the business at controlling turnover rate both his own and the teams

    not a 1 40 though

    3 40 with team option on ng 3rd season
     

Share This Page