Female Pedophile Epidemic? Teacher Admits She Had Sex With 5 Students

I thought they matured physically faster than boys? Because I am SURE it is not mentally. I don't know a single mature woman.

 

His name is Leatherface.

 

Look - any boy that would be traumatized by sex at 15 with an attractive 25 year old female isn't normal to begin with. Are you kidding me?

But for a girl, it's totally different. It's just not the same.

 

its really a matter of law. these boys are minors, there is no getting past that. let me ask you this, I can't remember her name but do you remember the case of the teacher who got pregnant. she went to prison and got out and they were married.

now that's the extreme, I admit, but do you really think that was an okay situation for that kid, he was 14 or 15 I believe.

 

Look, you start trying kids as adults for crime, maybe they are adults to some degree. It's not a matter of law to me, since not every law is just or right. Laws are political as well, and based on fears and biases to boot.

If people didn't break laws, blacks would have far less rights.

Is it disgusting that a 25 year old women would want to fool aroudn with a 15 year old boy? Yes. Is it pedophilia? I don't think so. I don't even think a 25 year old man fooling around with a 15 year old is if they both are into it.

Where's the line? I don't know. But I do know that it's a gray area in today's world where you have 15 year olds having babies.

 

I never made said "blanket statement".

What I said was that sexually, at that age, boys are plenty different from girls. And to approach or treat both in "most cases", when involved on the receiving end of sexual assault by the opposite sex, equally, is rather innane.

We also must consider that a girl at that age , when she consents, she actually includes a thought process into her decision. The teenage girl's approach to sex is a little different than that of a teenage boy's. Not too much mind you.. let's not give them excessive credit.. But it's that little extra thought before the decision that makes for a whole lot of difference. Unless of course.. the girl is exceptionally horny and wants sex in hopes of nothing more than sheer sexual satisfaction. Which at that age.. is extremely rare.

 

do you really think that teenage girls and teenage boys are thinking the exact same thing? or are you just playing devil's advocate?

 

and that's the point, the law has to be consistent. you can't go on a case by case basis and you can't say its only illegal for men to have sex with girls because boys are horny all the time. btw the lady's name was Mary Kay Letourneau

 

I never said that, as a matter of fact I specifically wrote girls usually mature faster than boys. i don't even understand your misunderstanding.

 

You're right, I reread it and you did use the qualifier 'usually'. I jumped to the conclusion because you would prefer a law treating the sexes differently.

How about if we do it by a case by case basis? We ask the underage person, boy OR girl, and if they say they consent, then case closed, no harm, foul.

 

co-signed. I definitely would have paid attention more if my teacher was putting out.

 

but in this case, there's no or little consistency. it's completely arbitrary what that age is. It's clear that it's wrong for anyone to have sex with a 9 year old regardless of gender...but what about a 17 year old? If an 18 year old guy has sex with a 17 year old - who cares?

So what do you do in the case of a 15 year old? I think a factor that has to play into something is whether or not it's consensual. And it does need to be a case by case basis.

Laws are rarely applied consistently. That's why you have judges. Life isn't arbitrary.

 

you're totally ignoring that these are teachers also, they're put in a position of trust. so age is only one issue

I really doesn't matter what I think. I understand just because something is illegal it doesn't mean its wrong, but it is illegal, so these women can refrain from having sex witht these kids or they can suffer the consequences when they are caught.

we have judges to make sure laws are applied fairly and consistently, no make up things as they go along.

 

Agree. Real men are not vulnerable to this kind of advances. . On the contrary, we're here to give women pleasure... right boys???

 

in another thread there was a chart on the varying degrees of teacher/student sex. male/male, male teacher/ female, female teacher/male, female/female, and the varying degrees of acceptability

 

I'm tempted to hunt around the web for some evidence that ya'll are full of crap thinking statutory rape doesn't do damage to male victims, but I can't think of any search terms that won't get me fired.

 

I can't imagine it being a big deal if I had boned one of my teachers at 15 or 16. I'm not saying it is right but I'm not super freaked out about it. For the majority of guys, sex is sex at that age. Girls are a different breed and I see it more along the lines of taking advantage of them. It is what it is.

If my son nailed one of his hot teachers at 15, 16, 17 I'm not sure exactly how I'd feel. Upset I'm sure but probably not that upset.

On the other hand if a male teacher hit it with my daughter at the same age, I'd probably end his life.