1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Feigen] Still want to rip Rafer? Skip it.

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by DPballer, Nov 8, 2008.

  1. faraza84

    faraza84 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,088
    Likes Received:
    71
    alston , head, landry for felton and 1st rounder.
    they need a backup for augustine, they like landry hes in game shape unlike may and head can shoot. in return we get a better pg and a better pick. i know jordan wants to own more of the team and brown wants better peices so this could work.
     
  2. Prometheus

    Prometheus Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2008
    Messages:
    584
    Likes Received:
    0
    The fact that we have to make up excuses to validate why Rafer is a "good" point-guard says everything about the situation.
     
  3. faraza84

    faraza84 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,088
    Likes Received:
    71
    alston head and battier for wallace and felton works
     
  4. YaoMac09

    YaoMac09 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2008
    Messages:
    5,452
    Likes Received:
    3,784

    Bobcats won't do that trade, does not make them better.

    we should try to trade our expirers and a 1st round to Portland for Blake and a couple of 2nd rounders or Sergio Rodriguez who apparently wants to leave portland.
     
  5. larsv8

    larsv8 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2007
    Messages:
    21,663
    Likes Received:
    13,916
    Alston is simply the worst starting point guard in the league. Thats the reason he gets criticism.
     
  6. bbjai

    bbjai Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    Messages:
    1,693
    Likes Received:
    11

    I'm sorry thats a really dumb statement

    our pieces don't really fit at the moment either.

    we must suck as well according to your logic
     
  7. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,580
    Likes Received:
    38,804
    Our pieces fit, we just need time to work out the chemistry issues, remember last year?

    Playing basketball requires everyone to take on a certain role, and once those roles are clearly defined the game gets easier.

    Right now the roles are not clearly defined.

    Well...all of that...and ....uh...Rafer sucking.

    DD
     
    #47 DaDakota, Nov 8, 2008
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2008
  8. bbjai

    bbjai Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    Messages:
    1,693
    Likes Received:
    11

    The clippers have had Baron out for most of the preseason, Camby out for most of the preseason, J will retire on them.

    I'm pretty sure if your talking about roles not clearly defined the Clippers would be the definition of it.

    You can't make sweeping statements about other teams about their pieces fitting or not. The Clippers are not in the Sacremento class of sucking. I would class them as a Golden State randomness. Potential to own and potential to lose by alot. Philly is going through the same thing as of current time. We nearly lost to bloody OKC so I don't think we have a right to call ourselves Championship contenders as of yet.

    I still haven't seen any evidence of Artest, Tmac and Yao working together in a cohesive Big 3 Celtic fashion. Granted like you said it takes time but it possibly may not work. Thats just the truth.
     
  9. Precision340

    Precision340 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Messages:
    3,481
    Likes Received:
    37
    if only the other teams didn't leave him open all the time he wouldn't have to shoot the ball
     
  10. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,580
    Likes Received:
    38,804
    You are preaching to the choir, I never wanted Artest unless we could get him for nothing, because I didn't think he fit.

    But if you can get him for basically a low first round pick, or two...you roll the dice.

    Now, we have to see if it fits.

    I would start Battier and bring Artest off the bench to play when Yao is out.

    DD
     
  11. Pat

    Pat Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2002
    Messages:
    2,576
    Likes Received:
    658
    I agree with the mouthpiece. Rafer contributes. He is our weakest starter, but he does contribute. Look how well we did in the playoffs without him last year!

    There is more to the game than just scoring. I know that we are all fans here, but if you are not watching both sides of the ball, you are missing the best part of the game.
     
  12. worzel gummidge

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    6,533
    Likes Received:
    150
    It's like being in the middle of nowhere with a flat but no spare. You keep on going with that flat not because it's good but there is no other option.
     
  13. roslolian

    roslolian Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    29,896
    Likes Received:
    20,042
    Um yeah, let's give up our best sub for felton, because a career 32.7 3 pt shooter is so much better than Rafer :rolleyes:


    Face it, Rafer is the best we can do at this point. I hate his shooting as much as you do, but the fact is if you already have Yao Ming, Tmac, Ron Artest, Shan Battier and Scolandry on board, then you have to give something up...in our case its Rafer :(

    Sure you could probably trade one of those pieces to upgrade Rafer, but considering our stars are pretty fragile it might not be such a good idea to trade away our depth. Why don't we wait until Tmac heals completely and Shane Battier returns to actions before we decide if Rafer deserves the axe or not? Ideally, Rafer's shooting should not be a problem at all with all the weapons on our roster....
     
  14. geekSnake

    geekSnake Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    9
    Hinrich just got wasted though, torn ligament on right thumb, out for three months.

    http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=ap-bulls-hinrichout&prov=ap&type=lgns
     
  15. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,280
    Y'all missed the most important part of the article.

    Once again, proof that Feigen reads this BBS - even though he never admits it.
     
  16. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,580
    Likes Received:
    38,804

    No doubt about that, he gets tons of his ideas for his stories from this BBS.......

    DD
     
  17. Yakapo

    Yakapo Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2007
    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    3
    Feigen is obviously a laker fan.

    who else would want rafer to play?
     
  18. pippendagimp

    pippendagimp Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2000
    Messages:
    27,751
    Likes Received:
    22,724
    The Mouthpiece is a pathetic little tool devoid of even a scant speckle of journalistic integrity, indeed.
     
  19. kjayp

    kjayp Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    8,950
    Likes Received:
    7,758
    Speaking as a longtime 'Rafer hater'.... if he can't shoot, but has other tools, fine - DON'T FREAKIN YOU MORON! I'd much rather have a backcourt of Tmac and Marbury... i'd rather gamble on 'a cancer' than a Rafer floater or brick.
     
  20. killlogan

    killlogan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2008
    Messages:
    253
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, I have to disagree with you even though some of your points are really true. Rafer sucks some time but it doesn't meat that he is among the worst PGs and the worst starting PG. I agree with Feigen more than you, so it's no wonder feigen is a famous NBA analysist while Mr DD is just a famous clutchfan. I have nothing againest you and any other rafer-hater, I just expect you to offer some suggestions to boost our team a little rather than throwing critics onto rafer. I also don't think rafer is smart enough to run as a great team as the Houston Rockest, then whoelse can do this job? There's no doubt that CP3 and deron can, but no way can morey get them two to work for us. Kidd is experienced and capable enough to dominate the game, but he's not affordable. Rafer may be the best PG we have or we can have at present. Francis may explode after rehhabing, but it seems more of a gamble than a hope to expect him to explode. It's more effective and practical to excute some trade to upgrade our PG, I think. Then, who have too may PGs to refuse a trade? Of course the Bulls. Okey, relax, I don't intend to take Hinrich here. I meant to trade rafer for sofolosha who is good at defense and smarter than rafer in offense. To persuade the bulls to excute that trade, maybe we'll have to add landry or some future picks. But there's nothing more ideal that having a talented PG.
     

Share This Page