1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[FEDERALIST] If We’re Going To Have A Racial Double Standard It Should Be About Black Americans Only

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by Os Trigonum, Aug 11, 2018.

  1. Os Trigonum

    Os Trigonum Contributing Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    72,902
    Likes Received:
    111,087
    http://thefederalist.com/2018/08/10/going-racial-double-standard-black-americans/

    If We’re Going To Have A Racial Double Standard, It Should Be About Black Americans Only
    No other group—not Hispanics, Muslims, or anyone else—have faced what black Americans have. Race in America is not about people of color. It’s about black people.
    [​IMG]
    By Prajwal Kulkarni
    August 10, 2018

    David Marcus recently criticized the New York Times for promoting a racial double standard when they decided to stand by Sarah Jeong despite her history of racist tweets. According to Marcus, the Times has “no problem denigrating white people in a way they would not any other group” because they have implicitly embraced “privilege theory and its hierarchies of oppression.” Marcus rightly worries that this double standard does more harm than good and “is a dangerous road to a dark place.”

    While Marcus’s analysis is largely correct, there is an even bigger problem with Jeong, white privilege theory (WPT), and leftist racial discourse in general: It is profoundly, deeply unfair, and not just to white Americans. The Left’s inordinate focus on whites is especially unfair to African-Americans.

    The crux of race in America isn’t that white people have “hidden advantages.” It’s that African-Americans have, and always have had, obvious disadvantages. Rather than white privilege, we should be focusing on black suffering. If there is a racial double standard, it shouldn’t be about whites at all. It should be about black people, and only black people.

    African-Americans Have a Unique History in America
    Especially as America has transformed into a multi-racial rather than bi-racial democracy, it doesn’t make sense to continually harp on white people. It makes even less sense to lump the African-American experience along with that of other minorities.

    Take the term “people of color” (POC). It implies that we can view race relations as white people on one side and all racial minorities on the other. But that framing is nonsense. POC didn’t experience 250 years of slavery. Black people did. POC didn’t get lynched almost 4,000 times. Black people did. And POC did not put up with decades of Jim Crow and formal housing discrimination. Black people did.

    WPT glosses over these horrors that were perpetrated only on African-Americans. But this glossing over, this equating of blacks with all POC, is inevitable if you fixate on white people.

    Ultimately the problem with white privilege theory isn’t its focus on privilege or white people. It’s that it minimizes what African-Americans endured. Yes, it’s true that some people might be treated with “more respect and dignity based on skin color.” But as far as race is concerned, only African-Americans have been uniquely harmed by such disrespect.

    The Obsession with Whites Sidelines Blacks
    So rather than WPT, it would be better to adopt a black-centered framework when discussing race. In this framework, the Jeong controversy would not exist—not because white people aren’t sometimes privileged, or white supremacy didn’t exist, but because any racial discussion would be viewed entirely through the lens of blacks. In this world, it would be bizarre for anyone to be so obsessed with whites. The common liberal trope that “America is based on white supremacy” would disappear from our vocabulary, and instead become something like: “America was built on black slavery.”

    While the difference between those phrases may seem small, the second does something that our current discourse tragically does not: place African-Americans at the center of our racial narrative and treat their journey with the solemn reverence it deserves. However many races there are in America today, black and non-black are still the only two racial categories that matter. Privilege theory and the Left’s approach to race gets it completely backwards.

    To meaningfully engage with race, conservatives should thus do a couple things. In terms of our public rhetoric, we should acknowledge, as I’ve argued previously, that racial identity is a meaningful concept. But we should simultaneously insist that African-Americans are special, and strongly denounce anyone who suggests otherwise.

    In policies, we should as much as possible treat all groups equally, something Marcus has also called for. But we should also be open to making exceptions on a case by case basis. Only two groups should qualify for exceptions: African-Americans and Native Americans. Although discussing Native Americans is beyond the scope of this essay, they too have suffered uniquely. All Americans should place the experiences of these two groups on a pedestal and never compare them to anything else.

    All Immigrants Are Closer to Whites than to Blacks
    Placing black Americans in a racial category by themselves and reducing the salience of “white” could also build national cohesion because it would be easier to highlight the commonalities among all immigrant groups. Muslim-Americans could appreciate that while they surely face bigotry and are “people of color,” they have much in common with the Irish and Italians. Minority immigrants must logically be compared to other immigrant groups, not African-Americans. In America’s racial hierarchy, all immigrants are much closer to whites than we are to blacks.

    This approach may also help the Sarah Jeongs of the world see that whites do not automatically have privilege over non-whites: it is lunacy to assert that their race alone makes white Appalachians privileged over many second-generation Asian-Americans, whose parents were given visas because they were among the most talented doctors, engineers, and scientists in their countries of origin.

    I have been called racial slurs many times since I moved to the United States. I was once even punched in the face because I am a “f-cking foreigner.” But as traumatizing as such incidents may be to non-black racial minorities, it is grotesque to compare them to what happened to black people. Black people had—and have—it much, much worse. A black-centric approach would continually remind us of this fact.

    It would also help us to make sense of the overwhelming data that economic immobility afflicts African-Americans, and especially African-American men, over every other group. Given our history, why would we expect anything else? Even though others face hardship, black people stand alone in this regard.

    In a 1967 interview, Martin Luther King Jr. was asked why black Americans couldn’t progress like other immigrants. King’s response, said at a time when blacks were effectively our only minority group, is still relevant today: “No other ethnic group has been a slave on American soil. That is one thing that other immigrant groups haven’t had to face.”

    No other group—not Hispanics, Muslims, women, LGBT people, or anyone else—have faced what black Americans have. Race in America is not about whites or people of color. It’s about black people. White privilege theory trivializes this crucial fact.

    How You Look Doesn’t Tell Us Your History
    How did such a wrong-headed theory gain so much prominence? I suspect it’s because WPT is the only theory that could succeed in a multi-racial America. America never really wanted to view African-Americans as special. For a while we had no choice. But the second Hispanics and we Asians started coming over in significant numbers, WPT came along to save the day.

    After all, here’s an academic theory that effectively says to black people: “Don’t view your experience as special. Sure you’re the only ones who were enslaved and lynched. And sure some minorities are significantly better off than the average American, much less black people. But you really should just lump yourself in with all people of color.”

    We’ve accepted this fraudulent reasoning without realizing how ahistorical and morally bankrupt it is. Simply because they both generally happen to have darker skin than some other people, WPT has made it okay to analogize any brown-skinned immigrant, regardless of wealth or education, with an African-American whose ancestors experienced slavery and lynching.

    How is okay to make that comparison? What kind of country will we be if we continue doing so? Sadly, the country we have always been.

    Prajwal Kulkarni works at a software company and lives in Denver, Colorado. He writes on his personal website and is on Twitter.
     
    edwardc likes this.
  2. KingCheetah

    KingCheetah Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    56,139
    Likes Received:
    47,981
    What is your personal opinion?
     
  3. Senator

    Senator Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2018
    Messages:
    2,436
    Likes Received:
    910
    Are standardized tests racist?

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  4. JayGoogle

    JayGoogle Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Messages:
    50,204
    Likes Received:
    40,912
    What does this have to do with the OP?
     
  5. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    Speaking fluent standard American-English would help anyone go further than speaking broken English -- especially as a native English speaker.
     
  6. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    54,124
    Likes Received:
    112,628
    Okay.... well what about women?

    A lot of time spent on trying to decide who has been screwed over the most.
     
  7. Senator

    Senator Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2018
    Messages:
    2,436
    Likes Received:
    910
    Responding to the quote above.. wouldnt you say economic immobility is equal to lower aptitude regardless of race? The general crux of blue collar professions vs white collar? There is only so much you can point out without tip toeing around the obvious ... Honest opinions please.
     
  8. Invisible Fan

    Invisible Fan Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    43,273
    Likes Received:
    25,304
    There are quite a number of software engineers who are smart numbers-wise but never bothered to read a broad book in general history or ethnic studies.

    To them, if there's a problem or a premise, find its deficiencies and fix it. It's a very analytical and reductionist way of modeling and problem solving. They mostly happen to claim to be libertarian.

    The WPT is just a branch of many other theories. As an Asian like the author, my parents choose to be here. Blacks, First Nations and multi-generation Hispanics didn't. That's a big difference.

    There are substantial Mexican Americans who had ancestors who never hopped a wall or migrated here, rather they had their land stolen and citizenship put in limbo status. That practice, such as ignoring the rights afforded to them by treaties signed between the us and Mexico, became normalized as ways to treat Mexicans and their South American brothers.

    The way we treat many First Nations tribes to this day is so abominable that we don't even mention it in our day to day, while simultaneously playing images of the Noble Savage and the casino baron.

    Asians chose to be here but it wasn't until the 70s that the us allowed them a choice. It's wrongheaded for Asians to inject themselves into this debate while arguing concepts of meritocracy and being ignorant of all the struggles races had before us to set the table. And by struggles I also mean the Irish's, Italian's, German's, and slav's.

    If you view it from that lens, race conflicts are yet another proxy for class struggles. WPT can be a dangerous and divisive topic but I learned it as a tool for self awareness rather than some prop to shame people on social media. I recognize my privilege as an Asian who is possibly a doctor, engineer, or graduate degree holder, and I use it hard to get out of a ticket. Who wouldn't?

    How we deliver and communicate these messages are equally important, provided we have enough empathy and the right mind to start that conversation.
     
    #8 Invisible Fan, Aug 11, 2018
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2018
  9. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    54,124
    Likes Received:
    112,628
    It is getting harder and harder to argue the “black male” doesn’t figure heavily into poverty and lack of opportunity.

    In the past income, gender and age ther markers were arguable points but the data (and we have a lot of data now) shows when it comes to poverty being a black male in the USA is the short end of the economic stick.
     
  10. JayGoogle

    JayGoogle Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2007
    Messages:
    50,204
    Likes Received:
    40,912
    Well the obvious is that black americans go to poor schools more likely and thus score poorer on tests. In fact, some of these schools kids have to share text books, very hard to study for tests when you can't just take your text book home and you have to leave it in school so that the other kids can use it while in class...and you probably don't have access to the internet either. What is there to tip toe around here? Blacks score poorly on standardized testing since poor people score poorly on testing, and black people are poorer because of many factors. What else could it be?

    As for the OP, I feel like this is the Ann Coulter strategy of trying to turn black people against other minority groups but worded in a way that makes it seem a lot more rational. I think we can afford to look at situations separately, as @Nook mentioned, what about women?
     
    krnxsnoopy and B-Bob like this.
  11. CometsWin

    CometsWin Breaker Breaker One Nine

    Joined:
    May 15, 2000
    Messages:
    28,028
    Likes Received:
    13,046
    Yes.
     
    Rashmon and B-Bob like this.
  12. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    63,399
    Likes Received:
    26,016
    I'm not sure that there is a "lack of opportunity" for black males, but on average black men do have some significant hurdles in their way such as the fact that they have something like a 66% chance to be raised in a single parent home which makes it VERY likely for them to be raised poor. People raised in poor areas are less likely to learn the habits of successful people...rather they learn the habits of poor people which is another disadvantage. On top of that you have a dominant subculture in the black community that actively rejects hard work and education while glamorizing poor life decisions and criminality.

    If they can avoid those pitfalls though, they have all the same (and in MANY cases more) opportunities that any other person has.
     
    Hakeemtheking and deadlybulb like this.
  13. Senator

    Senator Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2018
    Messages:
    2,436
    Likes Received:
    910
    If you take the median 75%, not the best or the worst, put them in the same system with the same funding and think they will have the same results as the median 75% white? Is this an attempt to homogenize a merit based capitalist society that generally rewards the best and the brightest, which is why America is in the position it's in today?

    Explain.
     
  14. Svpernaut

    Svpernaut Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Messages:
    8,446
    Likes Received:
    1,027
    It is lack of opportunity, Blacks in America predominantly grow up in the inner city, in poor areas. Per capita, they get shittier education because of inner city schools. Hispanics face this somewhat as well. That's not to say that there aren't dirt poor whites, or Asians - but Blacks and Hispanics are poorer per capita.

    However, this script flips somewhat in higher education, where it is vastly easier for minorities to receive government assistance for college.

    There is a direct correlation between poverty and substandard education, it isn't a debate in the slightest. Where you find one, you will find another.
     
  15. Senator

    Senator Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2018
    Messages:
    2,436
    Likes Received:
    910
    The poor rich narrative is an easy one, but inaccurate concerning aptitude.

    What would you say to the following facts?

    https://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/07/alabamas_achievement_gap.html
     
  16. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    63,399
    Likes Received:
    26,016
    Being in a poor school doesn't mean that you don't have the same opportunity, especially when you can get into college with a lower GPA than others based on your race. The problem is that the motivation isn't the same due to other factors. Those who want to achieve growing up in those conditions will achieve. Those who prioritize stupidity, will be handing out rap demos outside of clubs while flipping burgers for minimum wage. Far too much effort is spent on stupidity within certain subcultures popular among poor people.
     
    deadlybulb likes this.
  17. Cohete Rojo

    Cohete Rojo Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,344
    Likes Received:
    1,203
    Also, if you get a girl pregnant, do not abandon her and your child. Be a man. The end.
     
    cml750 likes this.
  18. Svpernaut

    Svpernaut Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Messages:
    8,446
    Likes Received:
    1,027
    Education is more about just where you live. It is generational. If your parents are less educated, you'll more than likely be less educated. I'm not saying that blacks can't succeed, but this is a systematic issue that has gone on for decades. Poverty and a lack of education goes hand in hand. The raw test numbers don't tell the entire story.

    Have you been to a poor school? I went to both poor and affluent schools, and there was most certainly a difference. Just go look at teacher salaries for inner city schools versus the suburbs. Teachers make 20% or more teaching in the suburbs.

    There is most certainly a correlation between student success and dollars spent in education. To say there isn't is disingenuous.
     
    Invisible Fan, B-Bob and JayGoogle like this.
  19. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    63,399
    Likes Received:
    26,016
    Better yet, just don't have a child outside of wedlock early in your life. Having kids early, whether you abandon them or not usually sentences you to poverty.....and sentences that kid to growing up in poverty.
     
    deadlybulb and pugsly8422 like this.
  20. Senator

    Senator Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2018
    Messages:
    2,436
    Likes Received:
    910
    The parents are earning 6 figures... I'm pretty sure that doesn't come from not being educated. These are students in the same region who have parents making 6 figures.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now