No reason to assume everyone liked Friends. Redundant story arcs and generationally skewed setting and premise. Still a good case study for graduate communications program on how exactly to develop, produce and manage a show. The network, the actors and even the breakout star did everything correctly (not greatly) for ten years. (On very few top shows, the Big Bang Theory for contrast; do all cast members lobby for equal pay.) Conversely, Seinfeld was less a well-maintained network production than a magnus opus for two near perfect comedic writers.
I didn't have a TV in college and the sets at the student union didn't have cable; so I regularly watched that waiting for MAD TV and SNL to come on. Perhaps Norris's basic decency and earnestness had something to do with it, but that was a horribly written show.
big simpsons fan as well. Home improvement still gives me a chuckle every now and then. But the recent seasons of simpsons are horrible, don't find it funny at all
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/P5HIarf0CFM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Seinfeld, MWC, Friends. Simpsons started in 89 and is still ongoing, so while you can put it up there with other 90s shows, it's more in a class of its own. Same with south park.
Spoiler Spoiler I loved that show (even if it took its concept from another show) and not just because of: Spoiler
Turns out Power Rangers and TMNT wasn't as awesome as it was when I was a kid. Surprising isn't it? Though TMNT is still awesome, I just didn't remember so little fighting, but there is almost none. Rocksteady, Bebop, and Shredder were total wusses.
