1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Expedition vs. Tahoe

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout' started by drapg, Apr 27, 2004.

  1. Rockets10

    Rockets10 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2001
    Messages:
    588
    Likes Received:
    1
    If you can wait a few months and downsize just a bit, just get a Ford Escape Hybrid; that way you can have an SUV and still get good mileage.
     
  2. bigboymumu

    bigboymumu Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 1999
    Messages:
    3,421
    Likes Received:
    1
    I own a Black 2003 Escalade. I bought it last April and I have less than 8000 miles on it. I am willing to give anyone on this board a good deal if they are interested. One owner!(me) Excellent condition. Just sits in my garage except for the weekends when I get back into town.
     
  3. Rocket104

    Rocket104 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2001
    Messages:
    898
    Likes Received:
    4
    If you're going to spend that much...

    why not wait until the end of the year for the Lexus SUV Hybrid? Initial reviews say they get nice gas mileage while still performing like a light SUV.

    Otherwise, get a bad-ass sedan since you want a bigger car. A huge SUV is booooring if you're a single guy.
     
  4. rockets-#1

    rockets-#1 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,895
    Likes Received:
    9
    Tahoe's are da s***! There is not a better truck/SUV out there. Expeditions are just too much car unless you have a big family and even then you can still fit everyone in a suburban instead.

    Really, Tahoe's are just the best..... My opinion might be a little bias though considering I happen to be the owner of a '96 2 door Z-71 Tahoe.
     
  5. Raven

    Raven Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,984
    Likes Received:
    1,025
  6. mrpaige

    mrpaige Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2000
    Messages:
    8,831
    Likes Received:
    15
    How automakers save money with SUVs: They decided in the mid-1980s that they were going to build more light trucks to take advantage of all the regulatory loopholes and were able to do so very cheaply, even though they didn't have a lot of truck engineers. Ford had 12,000 car engineers and 400 light truck engineers in 1983, for example. What did they do? They took the steel underbodies of the pickup trucks and simply lowered onto them different passenger compartments and bolted them on. ... It was very cheap. You could build pickups and SUVs on the same assembly line.

    Since so many SUVs are car-based rather than truck-based at this point, I don't think this is so much the truth anymore.

    As a matter of fact, the move toward more car-based SUVs negates some of the things brought out on such websites. Except for the gas mileage issue, a Lexus RS330 (for example) has similar greenhouse gas emissions and the same EPA Air Pollution score as my sedan. The Toyota RAV4 actually has lower greenhouse gas emissions and supposedly gets better gas mileage (or about the same) as my Altima.

    Clearly neither the Tahoe nor the Expedition fall into this category, however.
     

Share This Page