Uh, the first paragraph you write referenced Lenski. I'm pretty sure that had to do with me since I'm the only person who posted about Lenski. "I can start wherever I wish. I've never heard of Lenski so how can I KNOW to read him/her/it?" Hurried again?
You are being disingenuous. People have posted constructive feedback. You really haven't considered it at all. You just keep repeating yourself while engaging in petty bickering.
It was you! You tried to tell me to educate myself before making a post-- specifically one you don't agree with, I suppose! You just suggested a resource but the way you suggested it made it sound like I should have been already familiar with it and I wasn't.
I'll repeat for the giddy impaired... If the facts don't fit Spoiler (giddy's preconceived ideas) he won't quit. You keep repeating that your goal is to "learn" but your rejection of scientific evidence (i.e. facts) belies your stated objective. Repeatedly.
So the first remark was for me? Earlier you said it wasn't. It's like you don't even read what you post. I'd say you're losing it giddy, but I think I'm pretty late in the game to make that remark. And Rash, he pretty much does a version of the Gish Gallop. It's a shame he doesn't want to learn and has repeatedly turned down the offer of a free book, or books. That alone tells me he doesn't genuinely want to learn and probably never will. He believes his ignorance is equal to the knowledge of others, I suppose. It's pretty sad.
