1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

ESPN: Rockets rejected Arenas for McGrady swap

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by scola4, Dec 29, 2009.

  1. Rocket River

    Rocket River Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1999
    Messages:
    65,171
    Likes Received:
    32,889
    Just no 6 for 1 deals like snottie drippen got us

    Rocket River
     
  2. smoothie

    smoothie Jabari Jungle

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2001
    Messages:
    20,716
    Likes Received:
    6,947

    i think the fact that washington made the offer at all says something about gil and his contract.
     
  3. Kojirou

    Kojirou Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    6,180
    Likes Received:
    281
    I would rather take a random scrub than Arenas. At least we won't be paying the scrub 85 million over 5 years or something ridiculous along those lines.
     
  4. jopatmc

    jopatmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2002
    Messages:
    15,370
    Likes Received:
    390


    .......................There you go pardna.

    If Washington did indeed offer Gilbert for McGrady, they knew this would be rejected, but they also likely are willing to pay more. The question is...how much more?

    And for all you guys that think Arenas is over the hill, dude is 27 YEARS OLD!!! He is not old. He's had a couple of injuries. But when his contract expires, he will only be 31-32 yrs old.

    Bad value contract???? Right now it is. It has no where to go but UP! Buy low, sell high. Obviously, McGrady for Arenas straight swap doesn't work and we won't do it. But what if Washington tossed in their unprotected first rounder and Haywood for McGrady and Cook??? Now, you've got a devalued asset with no place to go but up. Worst case scenario, you toss Gilbert out there with the 2nd unit and let him fire away for 20 mpg and light it up. It should already be clear that he can still score.

    Trading McGrady is all about acquiring assets, assets, assets.....to use in another big trade this offseason. It's all about stacking the deck.
     
  5. Ziggy

    Ziggy QUEEN ANON

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    37,271
    Likes Received:
    13,735
    Golden State had some interest in Arenas no? If we can three-way Arenas there maybe we can work something out? I would still love to have Butler but I doubt they would do that to Flip Saunders.
     
  6. Zfan

    Zfan Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2007
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    8
    I don't think Arenas is a good fit but at least he has a record to 2nd round. I would consider this as an reasonable option.
     
  7. Codman

    Codman Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    6,796
    Likes Received:
    11,954
    If Caron Butler or Antwan Jamison were included in the deal, I would have been for it. "Tough Juice" would be a great addition/replacement for McGrady.


    BTW...anyone catching these blurbs on HoopsHype about the Rockets not being opposed to bringing Tracy back? It sounds like they may try to fix the relationship.

    At this point, I don't know what's going on in the least.
     
  8. baller4life315

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    12,698
    Likes Received:
    3,032
    I would hope so. Arenas is the anti-Morey. I'm all for being involved in a three-way deal but NOT if it involves us taking back an insanely hideous and last-of-its-kind type contract like Arenas has.
     
  9. dbigfeet

    dbigfeet Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2002
    Messages:
    936
    Likes Received:
    9
    good. He even a worse ball hog than T-mac
     
  10. Omer

    Omer Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2006
    Messages:
    3,933
    Likes Received:
    56
    Thanks for the heads up, just saw this on via HoopsHype on Twitter

    http://twitter.com/ChrisMannixSI/status/7142848169
     
  11. Codman

    Codman Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    6,796
    Likes Received:
    11,954

    Yeah, I thought that was incredibly interesting. It would not surprise me if DM works something out with T-mac, allows him to play some more and evaluates him at the deadline.

    Talk about drama...Jermaine Taylor must be psyched!
     
  12. AggieDentist

    AggieDentist Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,243
    Likes Received:
    23
    What's the PHX rumor?
     
  13. RKREBORN

    RKREBORN Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    10,577
    Likes Received:
    11,831
    Tmac/Cook for Arenas/Haywood/Mike James works out great for both. They get 2 expirings, we get a young center and a dynamic scorer and an expiring in James.
     
  14. Shaud

    Shaud Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,350
    Likes Received:
    451
    What Phoenix rumor?
     
  15. Dave_78

    Dave_78 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
    Messages:
    10,809
    Likes Received:
    373
    There isn't anything they can add that would make me want to see Arenas in a Rockets' uniform. It's nothing personal against the guy it's just that his whole game/style of play is like a smaller, poor imitation of McGrady and that was never going to win us anything. Bringing in Arenas is like telling me the Rockets have no interest in a Championship for the next five years.
     
  16. baller4life315

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    12,698
    Likes Received:
    3,032
    Pretty much. Even though i'm thoroughly opposed to the idea, I had to play around on ESPN's Trade Checker just to see if there was a deal possible that wouldn't put me in the insane asylum. McGrady for Arenas/Haywood/Young or Blatche + 2010 unprotected first-round pick is the only thing I could come up.....and i'm still not interested.
     
  17. BimaThug

    BimaThug Resident Capologist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,440
    Likes Received:
    5,275
    http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=4777423

    Pretty interesting tidbit. This could mean one of two things:

    (1) Morey views McGrady's "sign-and-trade" value as greater than any savings the team could get from a post-trade deadline buyout. Remember, the Rockets can still get under the luxury tax this season just by paying someone to take Brian Cook off their hands. Probably a future pick, as well. But still.

    or

    (2) Morey is bluffing, getting teams (many of whom would otherwise just wait until the team buys out T-Mac after the trade deadline in order to sign him as a free agent) to up their trade offers for Tracy, fearing that "it's now or never" to get him while his value is low.
     
  18. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    129,047
    Likes Received:
    39,520
    Exactly.

    DD
     
  19. Dave_78

    Dave_78 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
    Messages:
    10,809
    Likes Received:
    373
    Either way, I like this line of reasoning on the part of Morey.
     
  20. Codman

    Codman Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2001
    Messages:
    6,796
    Likes Received:
    11,954
    I have confidence in Morey, but I think the return we get might be a letdown. If we were trading Tracy before the significant injuries, I would have been pumped to see what the Rockets could acquire.


    I will not be thrilled or remotely satisfied with a NY trade or for someone with a terrible long-term contract.

    If Curry becomes a Rocket, I may lose it.
     

Share This Page