1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[ESPN] Rockets looking to bring back Carl Landry

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by jaiaguilar, Jan 22, 2011.

  1. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,843
    Likes Received:
    39,243
    That is the worst argument I have ever seen, it is practically laying down, the organization almost always makes moves like I do, always.....especially in regards to assets.

    Why don't you explain how trading Scola for Landry makes sense?

    Instead of whinging about me pointing out your horrible trade.

    Explain why trading a starting PF for a backup PF makes sense when that backup PF is a complete free agent and we have the starting PF locked up to a reasonable contract for the next 3 or 4 years?

    Do you honestly see Morey trading a starter for a backup? His history suggests otherwise.

    The only way it makes a little sense is in the money, but overall it would make this team noticably worse.....

    Scola may not be in the top 10 in PFs but he is not that far behind in production, and Landry has proven in his starting stint that he is not even CLOSE to being a decent starter.

    Seriously, I am sorry I am coming off so harsh, but that is well below your normal quality posts or ideas, that one is rotten to the core.

    DD
     
    #121 DaDakota, Jan 22, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2011
  2. karthik.08

    karthik.08 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    17
    get Landry for a TPE, flip jhill/bud + picks for center or melo? i'd be all over that. similar to what we did with ariza - making a lateral move to fill out the depth chart is what morey might be looking to do.
     
  3. DaDakota

    DaDakota Balance wins
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 1999
    Messages:
    128,843
    Likes Received:
    39,243
    Now that makes sense...if you can get Dalembert etc, then that is another can of worms....

    We don't need Landry, his skillset is more than covered with what we have, and again...HE IS AN UNRESTRICTED FREE AGENT AFTER THIS YEAR......

    We do need a shot blocking, athletic, rebounding big though.....that instantly transforms everyone's role on this team...and would instantly make us a serious threat to make the playoffs.

    Anything else, is uncivilized.

    DD
     
  4. infinitidoug

    infinitidoug Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,219
    Likes Received:
    26
    I think we should take a serious look at bringing in Dalembert. I know there are a lot of objections out there but the guy is only 29, averages 1.6 blocks with little minutes, has a low turnover rate, rebounds at a acceptable rate if given the normal playing time, and is an all around good guy with a big heart. Oh yeah i forgot a tiny detail.....he's a true center and not a PF/C combo.
     
  5. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    Disagree.
     
  6. robbie380

    robbie380 ლ(▀̿Ĺ̯▀̿ ̿ლ)
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Messages:
    23,968
    Likes Received:
    11,114
    Has anyone mentioned generating an extremely large TPE in a potential trade with the Kings?

    Can't we do DPE for Landry and then 3 mil and Yao for a 2nd? Wouldn't this create a massive TPE for us?
     
  7. robbie380

    robbie380 ლ(▀̿Ĺ̯▀̿ ̿ლ)
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Messages:
    23,968
    Likes Received:
    11,114
    That would be a completely different type of trade.
     
  8. durvasa

    durvasa Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2006
    Messages:
    38,893
    Likes Received:
    16,449
    How is it completely different from a "trading a starter for a backup" type of trade, robbie380?
     
  9. mrjuandiego1988

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    Messages:
    499
    Likes Received:
    17
    our closer!!!!!
     
  10. HMMMHMM

    HMMMHMM Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2010
    Messages:
    4,031
    Likes Received:
    597
    You'd need some more outgoing salary from the Kings (~$1.3mil) to make the trade work, but yes it would create a giant TPE.

    I probably woudn't do such a trade though.
     
  11. robbie380

    robbie380 ლ(▀̿Ĺ̯▀̿ ̿ლ)
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Messages:
    23,968
    Likes Received:
    11,114
    Because we were trading for a much younger backup who wasn't a known commodity like Landry is. Landry and Scola are both known commodities. Unless the Rockets are regretting their contract with Scola then I don't see why we would trade for a player that isn't as good.
     
  12. mdoggnic

    mdoggnic Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2008
    Messages:
    972
    Likes Received:
    424
    That was a starter who 2 years later is looking for a job in China. I see what you did there but i think what was implied by the "trading a starter for a backup" comment was "talented vs less-talented player".
     
  13. robbie380

    robbie380 ლ(▀̿Ĺ̯▀̿ ̿ლ)
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Messages:
    23,968
    Likes Received:
    11,114
    Why do the Kings need to send out more salary? Can't the DPE be used to trade for less than what it's max value is? (eg. DPE for Landry) With their team payroll at 40.8 million after that trade then we can trade Yao to them and create a TPE that is large enough to swing for Carmelo I believe.
     
  14. wakawakka

    wakawakka Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2010
    Messages:
    383
    Likes Received:
    33
    Lowry was extremely young with a lot of room to grow. Landry is 27 and has more or less reached his peak. I usually don't agree with a single thing DD says, but he's right on this one. I might give up on this organization if they were dumb enough to trade Scola for Landry.
     
  15. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59,851
    Likes Received:
    132,642
    I agree... the time for Landry has passed. He fits the "good" but not "good enough" to make a difference player.
     
  16. Stevierebel

    Stevierebel Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2001
    Messages:
    3,140
    Likes Received:
    119
    Bringing back Landry would be a secondary move after one of the current PFs is traded. With that, I would like to have Carl back as he's an emotional guy whose effort can be contagious and he is someone who can also score in the 4th quarter. These are two things that this team is lacking right now.
     
    1 person likes this.
  17. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,831
    Likes Received:
    3,177
    So, civilize us - - who fits that bill? Cousins? They swear he ain't going away. Favors? Hmm, 'internet rumormongering' suggests Jersey Nyets want Martin. Simple deal: Martin - Dorsey. (Murphy and Hill 'flesh' out the $s.) Anyone else on or anywhere near the horizon? If last night is prelude, could ATL blow up their roster for cap relief? (Oh, gimme gimme gimme Josh Smith!) What's Nene's future? (Like anyone has a clue.)

    So, civilize us, please, if possible - - who fits that bill?
     
  18. HMMMHMM

    HMMMHMM Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2010
    Messages:
    4,031
    Likes Received:
    597
    The DPE for Landry part is fine, but the Kings woudn't be deep enough under the cap to take on Yao's contract.
     
  19. robbie380

    robbie380 ლ(▀̿Ĺ̯▀̿ ̿ლ)
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2002
    Messages:
    23,968
    Likes Received:
    11,114

    Ah yeah now I see! D'oh! :eek:
     
  20. BimaThug

    BimaThug Resident Capologist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,430
    Likes Received:
    5,198
    http://rockets.clutchfans.net/1249/trade-yao-for-nothing/

    You don't read any articles from this site, do you? :p
     

Share This Page