Which you didn't explain in the context of an actual question. Its about as open ended as you could make it. You left it up to my interpretation, and that's what I gave you. In the context of who was better last night (which is what it now sounds like what you were getting at), I have no clue cause I didn't watch much of that game. However I think they are two very similar players but in different scenarios & teams so it's an interesting comparison, but right now Bledsoe has the larger role with lesser talent, and what would seem like more responsibilities. If I had to pick one, I'd probably go with Bledsoe just because of the more evidence you have as a starter in a larger role. I think you know a little more about who he is if relied on for major contribution.
Yeah, I kinda saw the bad WB last night, playing out of control and forcing things that weren't there.
You don't like reading long posts. :grin: I figured I'd try to keep it real simple for you. Which is the better player? Not the better contract. Not which one is paid appropriately. But the better player. Next time I'll just leave the new thread with all white board and you can take it any way you like.
Hey, its basic communication 101 that open ended probing questions always derive the most dialog, but how open is too open? I guess knowing your posts I just question the motive (no offense). Simple question gets a simple answer then.... Bledsoe (But Jackson might be better value in a year or two)
Jackson to me screams player that is gonna get overpaid when he becomes a free agent (a good player on a great team that gets paid like a great player). Bledsoe is going to get paid, but non-centers that make their living on defense hardly get overpaid.
Durant will get his and then some no matter with or without Westbrook. But Jackson done killed the Rox with every loss to OKC with his additional scoring and play. Go back and look at the tape.
