1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Eddy Curry traded to the Knicks.

Discussion in 'NBA Dish' started by MrButtocks, Oct 3, 2005.

  1. gucci888

    gucci888 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,227
    Likes Received:
    6,573
    That's what is says on Realgm. Good trade for Chicago, NYK makes another big questionable move.

    For Chicago:
    Curry just wasn't that good. Chandler is a better player when he is healthy I think. Tim Thomas is a cool 12M coming off the books and Sweetney is a decent young PF that has some promise.

    For NYK:
    Curry? He's gonna solve their problem? Hahahaha. Curry is just another addition to their group of overpaid, undersized big man. You sign Jerome James to too much. You get Q and will have to pay him a lot. You still have Crawford, Marbury, Taylor, Rose. This is just a bad team.
     
  2. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,867
    Likes Received:
    3,208
    They'll win 40-42, and still be middling, at best.
     
  3. RocksMillenium

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2000
    Messages:
    10,018
    Likes Received:
    508
    I think it's ironic that people say the Knicks made a bad move because Curry is lazy considering that Thomas just went to Chicago and he is one of the laziest and most underachieving players in the league after signing a huge contract.
     
  4. macfan

    macfan Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,318
    Likes Received:
    1
    I think New York came on top in this trade for the first time in 7 years. It wasn't a significant trade when it comes down to it, nevertheless New York got the better of it. Chicago didn't get any talent to speak of. There's no way in hell Tim Thomas can play for Scott Skiles, he'll just get used to the smell of pine.
    The Knicks took a chance with Curry and even if he doesn't pan out, it's not like this trade will make them worse. If Curry plays like he did last year, they clearly got the better end.
     
  5. foodworld

    foodworld Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    965
    Likes Received:
    4
    Big difference: the Bulls can waive his ass immediately with no long-term financial consequences. He's just a $12 piece of crap that comes off the books.

    From what I heard, Curry got six years, $35 million (half of what Dalembert got.) Sounds about right, considering A) the health risk and B) the fact that he isn't a very good player. He's an inside scorer - but that's ALL he can do, and indeed Mike Sweetney has an offensive game very similar to Curry's. The Bulls will miss Antonio Davis more than Curry -- you heard it here first.

    Sorry guys, but I don't think the Knicks did much aside from adding payroll and filling a short-term need Isiah Thomas created. This is one of the deals they should have wised up and avoided.
     
  6. xiki

    xiki Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2002
    Messages:
    17,867
    Likes Received:
    3,208

    From NY -- 6/$60 mil and AD gets bought out, returns to Chi (isn't there a new rule against that?).
     
  7. jo mama

    jo mama Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2002
    Messages:
    14,602
    Likes Received:
    9,118
    i would have rather had tito.

    SHAMONE!
     
  8. lalala902102001

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2002
    Messages:
    6,629
    Likes Received:
    445
    I like the trade from the Knicks' standpoint.

    If any team in the league can take on another bad contract, it's NY. Let's face it: they already have too many bad contracts.

    Eddy Curry is one of the half dozen legit centers left in the league. He is a potential impact player.

    For once, Isiah Thomas took a risk that was worth taking.

    Chicago was forced to get the best they could for curry since it had become clear that they would not have him for more than one year. I think that John Paxson backed himself into a corner too early for publicly demanding the DNA test. Sweetney has some game, but he's undersized and overweight. Tim Thomas is just an expiring contract. If they only get one first-round pick back (which will be mid to late first rounder), they lose on this trade.
     
  9. emjohn

    emjohn Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Messages:
    12,132
    Likes Received:
    567
    I wouldn't, and I won't. This is a guy that came into the league figuring he was already a finished product out of HS, demonstrated an appalling work ethic, effort on the floor, and willingness to accept coaching during his rookie year. He stunk it up for 3 years, blatantly saving his efforts for whenever he had the ball in the post. His efforts on the boards and on D have been outright pathetic his entire career. He refuses to put in time during the offseason (infuriating the Bulls managment the past two summers) and has yet to get himself into good (NBA) shape.

    Curry took that resume (career avg at the time: 10.6 PPG and 4.7 RPG) and insisted on a max/near max extension last summer. He then had his agents demand a trade to a different team; either one that would be dumb enough to give him the contract or one that would allow him to pad his stats over the course of the season.

    Now, from what I've read, it's suspected that his one-time heart episode (it's not a diagnosed condition as no one's been able to pinpoint the root cause) came from drinking a couple of red bulls before a game. So it's not even a given that this heart issue is something that will reoccur.

    HOWEVER, what is a given is that Curry has yet to be a professional in this league, nor has he given anyone reason to believe that he will become one. Look at Zach Randolph right now. That contract looked great until he signed it, huh? What's scary is, he's three times the player Curry is. You're staring down the same situation. If Curry didn't care before, why in the world would you think he'll go Rocky IV on you once he has a $50 million deal in hand???

    This happens year after year after year, and the GMs never seem to get the lesson.

    Evan
     
  10. rrj_gamz

    rrj_gamz Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    15,595
    Likes Received:
    198
    All this is crazy...Not only does curry have a medical condition, he's lazy and will be ineffective...its the knicks though, so its expected...
     
  11. foodworld

    foodworld Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    965
    Likes Received:
    4
    Oh really? That really changes things - from New York's perspective, for the worse. Having both Curry & James, each with on-and-off effort and health to go with serious holes in there games, locked up to long term dough is very, very bad. Pairing terrible interior defenders with players like Jamaal Crawford and Quentin Richardson is going to hurt.

    And I think the "Gary Payton/Alan Henderson" Rule only applies to mid-season trades.
     
  12. room4rentsf

    room4rentsf Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2003
    Messages:
    2,409
    Likes Received:
    5
    I dont know.. I think NY needed big men and they filled that spot. Center is one of the hardest positions to fill and when Curry plays hard he can be decent. They dont need superstar they just need average / decent.

    They still are unbalanced but at least working to solve that..

    J
     
  13. emjohn

    emjohn Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Messages:
    12,132
    Likes Received:
    567
    Anyone else really looking forward to Larry Brown coaching Starbury and Curry at this point? I keep picturing an on-court shooting episode.

    Evan
     
  14. rimbaud

    rimbaud Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 1999
    Messages:
    8,169
    Likes Received:
    676
    How long before Brown and Zeke get into a public battle over Curry's limited minutes (Brown hates selfish, lazy players)?
     
  15. KellyDwyer

    KellyDwyer Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,660
    Likes Received:
    86
    The language surrounding the Gary Payton/Alan Henderson/potentially my man AD situation seems deliberately vague in the new CBA.

    That really stuck out to me earlier this summer, that they couldn't find a legal way to stop teams from doing this in a trillion-page CBA. That all they had to do was wait 30 days within the season.

    And, really, what's the point? If the Hawks don't want Gary Payton, and don't need him, then they should be free to waive him. And GP should be free to play for whatever team he wants. What's the point of being a hardass and making two teams/fan bases unhappy?
     
  16. tycoonchip

    tycoonchip Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 1999
    Messages:
    7,193
    Likes Received:
    5,726
    Curry is only 23 and I think with a great coaching staff like Larry brown brings the Knicks are going to be alright with him. Tim thomas and sweetney are nice but seriously how nice? Curry needed a fresh start and to be the focal big man. I like the move Isiah made. He definitely took a risk that was better than the one layden did by signing Alan houston to a max contract. They've got some decent pieces and I wonder how Brown is going to deal with it.
     

Share This Page