1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Eddie raves about Brooks

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by AussieRocket, Jul 1, 2007.

  1. rserina

    rserina Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    18
    Exactly. It's not like Brooks is expected to be our starting one. At best, he may get 20 mpg off the bench at this stage. If he struggles defensively, then he will never be more than a rotation player. But I was impressed in the few times I saw him play and think the expectations people have for a #26 are ridiculous. All of those fours you mentioned would be useless defensively against elite bigs. As a matter of fact, Chuck Hayes was a much better collegiate post-defender than McRoberts, Davis, or Fazekas.
     
  2. GMNot

    GMNot Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2002
    Messages:
    824
    Likes Received:
    87
    Yep. I alluded to this in the sticky Aaron Brooks thread:

     
  3. benchmoochie

    benchmoochie Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Messages:
    5,644
    Likes Received:
    132
    He reminds me of little Scotty Brooks.
     
  4. HillBoy

    HillBoy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2003
    Messages:
    8,939
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    Now I consider that a stupid reason to not take the best player on the board at that point. Who the F cares what the Suns were going to do? If that is indeed true, then Morey got played.

    Normally that's true but due to woeful drafts of the past 7 years, the Rockets desperately needed to hit a home run like finding a Tayshan Prince or Josh Howard with this pick and Brooks, while he was good college player, cannot be considered that due to his lack of height.
     
  5. Baqui99

    Baqui99 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2000
    Messages:
    11,495
    Likes Received:
    1,231
    I heard that President Bush likes to contact Eddie Johnson on foreign policy matters.
     
  6. BimaThug

    BimaThug Resident Capologist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,440
    Likes Received:
    5,282
    HillBoy, I think what ZBoy meant was that the Rockets valued Brooks just slightly more than they did Landry, Davis, Splitter or McRoberts. Given that the Suns (and the Spurs and Pistons?) also likely valued Brooks at this area of the draft, the Rockets did not want to risk losing out on the best player available in their estimation, especially if they had already begun discussions with the Sonics to trade for the #31 pick and knew that one of the aforementioned PFs would still be available at #31.

    From everything we have heard from Daryl Morey, Dean Cooper, Joe Ash, Eddie Johnson and other league sources and various local media in Houston, Detroit, Phoenix, San Antonio and Sacramento, it appears that the Rockets' draft board looked something like this:

    [Oden, Durant and various other players already off the board in the top 20]
    Rudy Fernandez
    Morris Almond/Aaron Brooks (I guess we'll never know which one the Rockets had graded higher)
    Carl Landry
    Glen Davis
    Tiago Splitter/Josh McRoberts

    I'm guessing that the Rockets probably had Fernandez and Brooks rated higher than some other players taken prior to #24 (i.e., Dudley and Chandler), so it's safe to say that the Rockets were pretty high on Brooks to likely have him in their top 22 or so.

    Bottom line: The Rockets didn't get "played" by anyone. If you disagree with their evaluation of Brooks as an NBA prospect, then you are certainly entitled to your opinion (hell, I'm not too thrilled with the pick either). But your criticism should be of the Rockets' entire evaluation process then, and not with Morey getting played by other teams. Keep in mind, though, that the Suns and other teams seemed to think just as highly of Brooks as the Rockets did.
     

Share This Page