Duncan deserves it, But IMHO Garnett deserves it even more. He leads his team in every catagory. That is MVP. The only reason Duncan got it and garnett didn't is because The spurs got a better ranking. Wich is also a good reason. But teams suck without Them. But IMO The wolves will suck more
I'm not so sure, the spurs don't have another scorer other than Parker. The wolves have Wally, Joe Smith, Troy Hudson, etc. The Spurs are just Duncan, he should be the MVP.
nice colour. what i think: first of al i do think both are great players wolves Wally: just a shooter who can't play D, that gets his shots because Garnett creates them for him, verry overrated IMHO Hudson: becoming a good pointguard. Nesterovic: isn't a good center grabs 6 rebounds. can score a few times Gill: good defensive player, isn't much of a scorer Peeler: nice player but nothing special. good shooter smith: can score grabs just 5 rebounds garnett leads his team in all 5 major category Points/game rebounds/game blocks/game steals/game assists/game spurs: robinson isn't as good as he used to be, but stil got 8 rebounds Parker: is starting to become a good PG. i know playing with duncan makes it easier. Jackson: i really like this player. every time i saw him play he was an treat on offense ginobilli: is getting better, can shoot and also is an offensive treat (ok not a big but he creates) ROse: i also really like this player, he is a hard working PF a good defensive player Bowen: great defensive player Smith isn't good anymore just like willis duncan leads his team in 3 major catagory: Points/game rebounds/game blocks/game as you see both do not have much of player along them. both team without their star comparisment Center *Robinson-nesterovic (edge to robinson) *rose- Smith (edge Rose) *Bowen- Wally (edge Wally) *jackson-peeler (edge JAckson) *Parker-hudson ( tie) this is al in my opinion. but if you look at the fact that Garnett leads his team i al major categorys then you will see why i think he should be MVP. Both player have mostly scrubs along them, IMHO Duncan has better players along with him, so he should have a better record. so i think Garnett should have been MVP
Duncan led his slightly better cast to the best record in the league. Not to mention the record breaking win streak on that road trip. I wish our rockets could win in cleveland.
TD=MVP.....Shaq and Kobe could not stop TD's Spurs.....T-MAC gets 8th seed in EC, JOKE.........KG has been/is/will be TOO soft to take his team anywhere. Fallaways are ok but moves going to the basket win playoff games.
Garnett can have an MVP when he gets his team out of the first round. Until then he really isn't all that valuable. I can lead a team to failure, and would certainly be willing to for $200,000,000.
KG's contract is a liability that makes his MVP credentials less attractive. Without his humongous contract the Wolves can get better players. Also, Nesterovic is better than Robinson. He averaged about 2.5 points more and 1.5 rebounds less than Robinson. He shot over 52% compared to Robinson's 46% which ranks 5th in the league. As for T-Mac, he sucked in game 5 and game 7. He's a choker, enough said. Tim Duncan deserves the respect.
