1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

DOMA: Obama invokes incest and people marrying children

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by basso, Jun 12, 2009.

  1. Batman Jones

    Batman Jones Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 1999
    Messages:
    15,937
    Likes Received:
    5,491
    How about the right not to be discriminated against? Oh, wait! That would deprive you of your right to discriminate! Darn.
     
  2. KingCheetah

    KingCheetah Atomic Playboy
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    59,079
    Likes Received:
    52,748
    Stop talking about his kids.
     
  3. halfbreed

    halfbreed Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2003
    Messages:
    5,157
    Likes Received:
    26
    Marriage is a well established fundamental right in Constitutional law.

    See: Loving v. Virginia
     
  4. Batman Jones

    Batman Jones Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 1999
    Messages:
    15,937
    Likes Received:
    5,491
    Or else? Jesus, Cheetah. Nobody on this whole board suffers from the same moderator delusion you do. Report me or put me on ignore. Your instructions are annoying.
     
  5. Landlord Landry

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Messages:
    6,857
    Likes Received:
    296
    okay, so now disapproving of someones lifestyle = hate. :rolleyes:
     
  6. Batman Jones

    Batman Jones Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 1999
    Messages:
    15,937
    Likes Received:
    5,491
    I'd also like to point out that I'm not talking about his kids. I'm talking about his abusive treatment of them. That's about him, not his kids. If he talked about physically abusing them on this board, I would tell him I thought he should stop. That wouldn't constitute talking about his kids; I'd be talking about him then too.

    There's at least a 1 in 10 chance one of his children will turn out to be gay. If that happens, he will have taught them it is wrong to be who they are. He will have taught them to hate themselves and he will have taught them that God disapproves of them being who they are. I'm sure I don't have to tell you how many young people have committed suicide or otherwise suffered horrible lives due to such abusive behavior on the part of the parents.

    Sooner or later though you're going to have to learn that if you'd like me to behave differently on this board you're going to have to get a moderator to agree with you and then tell me. I don't observe your imaginary authority.
     
  7. Landlord Landry

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Messages:
    6,857
    Likes Received:
    296
    not hateful.

    completely presumptious and totally false.


    I have already taught them that God loves them and every individual regardless of the decisions they make. Fail.

    Probably because it was done in the hateful way you keep insinuating I am conveying to my children. I am doing no such thing.
     
  8. KingCheetah

    KingCheetah Atomic Playboy
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Messages:
    59,079
    Likes Received:
    52,748
    I'm confident after some time to reflect you will make the correct decision.
     
  9. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,804
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    Obama doesn't thin gay marraige is right but he doesn't support DOMA, he wants it repealed by a leglative act by congress. He opposed DOMA when he ran for Congress in 06
     
  10. kokopuffs

    kokopuffs Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,637
    Likes Received:
    31
    there are age restrictions, are you against those?
     
  11. kokopuffs

    kokopuffs Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,637
    Likes Received:
    31
    You're r****ded. Love has nothing to do with it. Government CANNOT legislate love. Marriage has always ALWAYS been between a man and a woman. Even in cultures that were openly gay [ancient greece], there were no such things as 'gay marriages'; you had gay lovers but you never married them. Emotional argument is emotional.


    LOL lrn2law. They sure can.

    Apples and oranges.

    /me sighs. No. You understand that it is legal to discriminate in certain cases? For example, fire departments can discriminate in hiring practices against people on height, physical fitness, etc. because those are fundamental to being able to do an adequate job as a firefighter. Or would you like to say 'no, we can't discriminate against the 1-legged midget who wants to be a firefighter yet cannot adequately perform the job?' Get out of your liberal happy-fun-land and live in the real world please.
     
  12. halfbreed

    halfbreed Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2003
    Messages:
    5,157
    Likes Received:
    26
    Talking in memes doesn't make your argument better.
     
  13. kokopuffs

    kokopuffs Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,637
    Likes Received:
    31
    because internet (especially D&D) is serious. ****ing. business.
     
  14. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,170
    Likes Received:
    48,345
    I've just skimmed this thread and the title is completely misleading, no surprise. Obama didn't invoke incest or pedophilia as he wasn't the author of this brief and I didn't see evidence that he signed off on this.

    Second for Basso I don't see why you continue to bring this argument up to bash Obama supporters when clearly the politicians you supported didn't support Gay Marriage either. As you yourself note "no better than Bush" so you are doing nothing more than the pot calling the kettle black.
     
  15. Batman Jones

    Batman Jones Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 1999
    Messages:
    15,937
    Likes Received:
    5,491
    In the "real world," public opinion has turned against bigotry such as yours. Gay marriage will be legal in our lifetimes and your attitude will be regarded as ancient bigotry. This isn't a liberal vs. conservative thing anymore. It's young vs. old. Young people are overwhelmingly in favor of equal rights for gays (including marriage); only old people hold a majority against it. Guess what happens next? That's right: homophobia goes the way of racism. Oh, you'll still be able to practice it in private. But in "the real world," it will no longer be acceptable. Oh, happy day.
     
  16. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,170
    Likes Received:
    48,345
    Actually "pursuit of happiness" isn't the Constitution. Sorry to be picky but that is an important distinction in regard to rights.
     
  17. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,804
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    Obama says he will defend DOMA, my guess is because he feels its his job as president to defend the law.
     
  18. kokopuffs

    kokopuffs Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,637
    Likes Received:
    31
    i'm young and far from bigoted. I just see things as they are. You're the one that's living in a magical fairy land that will only end in America crumbling as the world's superpower (nothing to do with gay marriage, just the liberal agenda in general).
     
  19. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,170
    Likes Received:
    48,345
    I don't think this helps your argument unless you believe the only purpose to marriage is procreation. If that were the case then marriage where one or both partners was sterile would be disallowed.

    There are many reasons why people get married with procreation being only one of those reasons.
     
  20. Landlord Landry

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Messages:
    6,857
    Likes Received:
    296
    how irionic that you would use a heterosexual couple as an example ......, I'm not well versed in constitutional law, however, I'm not sure this warrants a constituional civil right to marriage, I read the text, and I see that the SCJ stated that they believe it's civil right, yet I still can't find any ACTUAL constitutional language that clearly defines it as such.

    Please, I'm all about being educated, so if i am misundestanding this, by all means correct me.
     

Share This Page