we dont need to create another rumor thread. plus, docrocket doesnt even post much anymore so let him make his own thread if he feels. cyberx is king here
Scott Brooks does nothing. Absolutely nothing. More of the same. Someone pointed out in one of these threads he had a good defense in OKC. That was probably when he had Ron Adams as assistant coach, who's now in Golden State.
jvg also took his #8 seeded, short-handed knicks to the finals. where's rudy t? last time i checked, he's got 2 rings.
Lol no way. He isn't elite but doesn't underachieve. After they went to the finals they never lost a playoff series when healthy.
Durant, Westbrook, Harden, Ibaka took a team to the finals. Mike Brown took the Cavs to the finals in 2007. He's available. Do you want him?
Agreed! Why the **** are ppl wanting to settle for Scott Brooks when they know he's not much better than Mcfail? This is the chance we have been looking for for 3 years let's not waste it.
Don't really understand this. Both guys have about the same amount of HC experience but Brooks trumps McHale in almost all regards including Conference and NBA Final appearances, winning percentage, etc...
on the fence about brooks, he's better than mchale but not ideal. depends on who they surround him with i guess
OKC fans will go on for hours if you get them started on Brooks. he had two of the most dynamic offense players in the game and still couldn't draw up plays when they were needed. He is literally the same as Mchale, except he has had alot more talent in his career and produced almost the exact same. Why fire Mchale unless your going to address the things that were his weaknesses in your next hire?
Funny because OKC wouldn't have made it to the Championship series without Harden's performance against the Spurs in the WCF
