My point was that i thought he was pretty good last season. I don't think he's really shown that much development. The biggest difference i saw in him was that he was wide open more often and he had better players around him. So there was no need to take bad shots and the shots he did take were easier. Court vision and handles were never a weakness in his game. What? I didn't say anything about Phil but that's some kind of logic you got there. A guy who wins one championship and a gets a consolation prize of a COY for leading a team to...nothing, is automatically thrusted above someone who's won what 9. Are you gonna throw Red under the bus because he had good players too?
