Dang...TJ, what did you do,...You presented a well written statement that represents the real Kerry,...and all of a sudden here come the neo-demo clowns, complete with pretty pictures sans the beer? ...What is up with them foos???
What doesn't make sense is how Trader_Jorge presents statements based on evidentiary fact and this is whimsically not addressed by the neo-demos, who prefer to talk about "acts", when the apparent "act" is them acting predictably without regards to fact based evidence as it relates to a leading Democrat nominee...
Actually I think Jorge has done us a favor. He is basically relaying the e-mail he got from the RNC testing out their currently being tested attack themes. Kerry can expect this type of attack as the main thrust of Dubya's campaign. After all a lying, lazy, dry drunk frat boy with only a few years of any sort of accomplishment was marketed as a man of sterling character. Conversely a boy-scout like Al Gore who spent his whole life in public service was cast as a liar without the sterling character of Dubya. I think even Madison Avenue will have a hard time on the alleged character of Dubya in this campaign. We should take the time to start addressing these charges as we know the Repubs all stay on message and these same A couple of weeks ago Jorge and the RNC were obsessed with DEan and did quite a number on him, albeit aided by the traitorous Lieberman and the other Demo candidates.
What doesn't make sense is how Trader_Jorge presents statements based on evidentiary fact and this is whimsically not addressed by the neo-demos Why would any Dems respond to these "points"? T_J distorts facts into goofy arguments that really have no backing, and then you expect people to waste time arguing them? They could respond and prove him wrong, T_J would disappear and then do it again in a few days. He's tried his hardest to be treated like a joke here, and that's exactly how he's treated now. Why waste the time trying to have a serious discussion with him?
What a great way to argue, all you do is say...this guy hates reason and logic, without really a proof. I just told a story to you about how you (and all the liberals on this board) are starting to sound like a whiny Punk Band, and how this realization is coming to me at the same time that the voting records of some of our colleagues are turning up for Nader, and I'm just saying to myself, hmmpphh...isn't that nice I can communicate with people whose beliefs are so different from mind and we can laugh about it. God, I love America.
No I seriously asked that question because I didn't understand what you were saying. And yes, America is great that crazy-religious nuts can talk with crazy-liberals and for the most part, it not come to blows.
3 pages of responses littered with pictures, links, cutdowns and insults, and yet not one, single, solitary defense of those facts. Plenty of the obviously addictive Bush-hating and Bush-bashing, but not a single word on here indicating that the initial post was at all wrong.
He's a lot smarter than Dean though, and much more "presidential." I don't know if any of these things are big enough to bring him down, although his role in a blatantly communist favoring group back in the day kinda scares me. I'm making the prediction that he will be the democratic nominee.
Did you read my post? Did you understand that Kerry was not a communist? Did you understand the ridiculous reason he is called a communist by these people and that it has no basis in fact? Do you know anything about our history from the Kennedy assassination to Watergate?
It was one thing to be against the war, but to be for the communist regime is another. To call the group communist is probaboly a bit extreme, and I apologize for that, but to say that communism is not an evil that should be stopped is a different thing, and that's what I doth protest to.
Communism at it's heart is not evil. It's a different type of economical system based on cooperation for everyone's good. There is nothing evil about that at all. I'm not saying in favor of communism, but it's not really a big deal in itself. When combined with authoritarianism then that's bad, because authoritarianism is bad.
Authoritarianism is the only way to do communism. Hmm. lets look at the "communist" countries. China- Check, Cuba- Check, hmmm looks like evil regimes to me. Communism is bad. I hate hearing that its not, just watch Dr. Zhivago.
