1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Do we draft a QB in the first round?

Discussion in 'Houston Texans' started by Sydeffect, Nov 10, 2013.

?

Should we draft a QB in the first round?

  1. Yes

    111 vote(s)
    70.7%
  2. No

    46 vote(s)
    29.3%
  1. tmacfor35

    tmacfor35 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    23,961
    Likes Received:
    14,562
    He will get his chance, and if he keeps it up, he will be the quarterback.

    I'm already excited for the draft.
     
  2. Cannonball

    Cannonball Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    21,888
    Likes Received:
    2,334
    I think he meant that he doesn't know what "Mettenburger really come TF" is supposed to mean. I know I don't.

    I could be wrong, but I think Mettenburger is projected as a 5th round pick. That's not necessarily a bad place to take a chance on a QB who has some skills but also some question marks. If you can tap into his potential, great. If not, well, what have the Texans done with their 5th rounders lately? You're not exactly losing much if he doesn't work out.

    I wouldn't let the LSU thing scare me off. Yeah, Russel was a bust. But Flynn was a 7th round pick and Jefferson wasn't even drafted. It's not like they were expected to be good. That's like saying the Colts shouldn't have drafted Andrew Luck because Trent Edwards sucks. Or shying away from Mariota because of Akili Smith, Joey Harrington, Kellen Clemens, and Dennis Dixon.
     
  3. ima_drummer2k

    ima_drummer2k Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    36,373
    Likes Received:
    9,277
    I actually think 10 games is the perfect sample size.
     
  4. Cannonball

    Cannonball Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    21,888
    Likes Received:
    2,334
    We'll have to see if this last game is an aberration or not, but it looks to me like Arizona adjusted to Keenum's game. Keenum takes more chances and likes to throws the ball deeper than Schaub who preferred the short and intermediate passing game. It looks to me like KC and Indy tried to defend us as if Schaub were still the QB, defending the short and intermediate passes while not worrying that much about the deep ball.

    Arizona defended the deep pass very well. And knowing that Keenum likes throwing deep, they were comfortable blitzing because they knew that they'd have extra time getting to the QB waiting for those routes to develop. Like Indy in the 2nd half, they largely took Andre out of the game. Andre got 2 TDs, but he was well covered, only had 3 other catches, and less than 40 yards. And Keenum had some balls that definitely should have been picked off a couple of times yesterday. He does take chances and I'm honestly surprised that he hasn't thrown an INT yet, though luck plays a part in that.

    Maybe it's an adjustment to Keenum now that there's some real tape on him. Or maybe it was Arizona just playing really good D. We'll have to wait and see. If it is because there's now a book on Keenum and his tendencies, it will be interesting to see if and how Keenum and the offense adjust.
     
  5. Raven

    Raven Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    14,984
    Likes Received:
    1,025
    If the QB rankins are in this order, Manziel is going to be sitting there when the Texans pick, and Mettenberger would be considered a reach, so there would be a temptation to shore up the OL or a select a WR to replace Andre and save money. No matter how you slice it, that first pick is going to be a controversial pick.

    Bridgewater
    Mariota

    Manziel


    Mettenberger
     
  6. Hey Now!

    Hey Now! Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2000
    Messages:
    14,526
    Likes Received:
    5,526
    ... and a record of 0-16... :)

    I can't believe I'm going to say this... but (oh, lord... let me sit down) I actually................. I agree with ubigred. Keenum remains an immediate upgrade - but longer term: he's not making critical plays when they're needed, the offense is bogging down at important moments; some of his FI/CI tendencies are being marginalized and he's not making defenses pay for what they're not taking away...

    IOW... it may *look* different - but isn't really different at all.

    I'll give him every last second of this season; but we have to know for sure. Right now, his performance is exactly what we *don't* want - terrific play interspersed with terrible play and no real handle on how much of the success/failure is on him. He either needs to go Aaron Rodgers on us, or David Carr and scorch the earth.
     
  7. solid

    solid Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2001
    Messages:
    21,162
    Likes Received:
    8,980
    You talk like he is out there alone, and he is supposed to overcome any and all adversities thrown at him. He can't overcome his team's limitations and the other team's assault without help. He needs coaching help, protection, and decent field position which he has had very little of. Given the circumstances, he has exceeded my expectations. Is he the future? Too early to answer, but I certainly think he could be. Schaub looked bad much of this season and he had a full compliment of players. Case has essentially no running game and a decimated defense. Schaub had full coaching support, a long training camp with the first team, a top ranked defense. In a sense, Case has been thrown to the wolves and he has done surprisingly well.
     
  8. conquistador#11

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    39,119
    Likes Received:
    28,186
    same here. young qbs are going to throw bad balls, kaepernick and luck just this week.
    what is the most urgent is replacing newton and making our defense a feared one.
     
  9. tmacfor35

    tmacfor35 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    23,961
    Likes Received:
    14,562
    So do you give up on your franchise guy after 3 games?

    If you get the number one pick.... Take Clowney.

    Qb is risky.... See Jags/titans
    Keenums already better than both.

    Draft Clowney, keep Smith and grab a corner with next pick.
     
  10. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    76,683
    Likes Received:
    25,924
    Literally...exactly...to the word...what my 13 year old boy (who you met at the Astros event) texted back to me when I texted him those stats earlier today.

    I'm personally pretty impressed with Keenum, and I did not expect to be...I don't think you can ask a whole lot more from a guy making his first 3 career starts. I think that context is being missed. I assume defenses will get better against him...but I also assume he will improve, as well.
     
  11. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,943
    Likes Received:
    19,843
    You're dead to me.

    Just kidding <3

    Seriously though, this is Matt Schaub 2008-2010 all over again.

    But for reals...

    [​IMG]
     
  12. ItsMyFault

    ItsMyFault Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Messages:
    15,646
    Likes Received:
    978
    Definitely draft a QB.
     
  13. Nick

    Nick Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 1999
    Messages:
    50,783
    Likes Received:
    17,150
    Lost in all of this is that he's flourished under coaches and a system that has consistently put QB's in a position to succeed initially.

    Schaub found initial success once he got some starting experience and some talent around him.

    Rosenfels had his best games of his career here.

    Yates came in and exceeded expectations initially as a rookie. Hell, Leinart probably would have been serviceable enough for that team as well.

    I do not feel, however, that the Texans system or coaches have the ability to counter-act game plans that specifically deny them what they do well... once the run game gets taken away, and they scout against the play-action/bootleg, they do end up limiting the big-play ability of this offense.

    Most great offenses get figured out eventually... and teams have to evolve. What Case does the rest of the season, and how this team adjusts once he's specifically game-planned against, will determine which direction they take.

    Also, allowing this regime to pick/develop a new QB essentially buys them another 3-4 years.... till said QB plays consistently and possibly fails.
     
  14. Drew_Le

    Drew_Le Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2001
    Messages:
    718
    Likes Received:
    78
    Keenum's escapability, arm strength, and accuracy have all been very impressive. More than that, he seems to have the leadership ability that the great ones possess--a team full of veterans have consistently praised his demeanor in the huddle and the locker room.

    Of the 3 1st round talents, only 1 seems likely to be available when we pick (Manziel). While I love watching Manziel play and sling it around like we're back at recess in elementary school, his immaturity is a real red flag. QB, unlike any other position, requires a leader. When you look at similarly impressive players with questionable leadership abilities, none have proved that they could escape from their personalities and become one of the league's great ones: Michael Vick, Jamarcus Russell, Jeff George, Ryan Leaf to name a few. The only real counter-example I can think of is Brett Favre, who was a hot-head when he first came to Atlanta.

    Thus, if we're talking about whether to take a QB in the first round, what we're really talking about is Manziel versus Keenum. And if I had to stake my career on it as the Texan's GM (whoever that is), I'm putting my money on Keenum.
     
  15. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,943
    Likes Received:
    19,843
    As QB friendly as Kubiak offense is, it shouldn't be lost on anyone that only Matt Schaub (to this point) is the only Texans QB that has been able to perform satisfactorily. The list of guys who tried to run Kubiak's system and failed is quite lengthy. It should also not be lost that Keenum isn't just flourishing, he's doing better than almost any QB ever has sum-total in his first 3 starts. Something Schaub sure as hell didn't do.

    Errr... not sure what you mean by "initial". "Some starting experience and some talent" would tend to contradict the term "initial".

    I don't think the offense the Texans have run the last 3 weeks is all that similar to the one they ran the first 6 weeks of the year, and it's not even close to the one they ran 2011-2012. Which is what impresses me all the more about Keenum. He is driving a totally wrecked junker in terms of talent with a revamped-on-the-fly gameplan and still keeping things competitive. Meanwhile, the last two seasons we had guys driving blueprinted juggernaut (Leinart, Grossman, Yates) that could barely keep pace. Keenum is doing better with a jalopy than they did with a Porsche. There's absolutely room for improvement, but it's impressive.
     
  16. Ziggy

    Ziggy QUEEN ANON

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    37,264
    Likes Received:
    13,730
    For one, you almost have to take a QB because the position is so important. Investing in QB trumps any other need we have. If Keenum plays extraordinarily in 2014 and the rookie QB never steps on the field you cant blame management for playing it safe. QB is something you can never be too cautious about.

    Saying Manziel is a lock to be third QB taken seems a bit strange. It's too early to tell. There are other players at the position that will have high stock. If it comes down to the 3rd QB taken and an outrageous talent like Barr or Clowney (assuming they grade out as expected) then yeah, you better wait until the 2nd round and go with Carr or something.
     
  17. sammy

    sammy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2002
    Messages:
    18,949
    Likes Received:
    3,528
    If Keenum continues to toss 2, 3 touchdowns with no picks like he has, it'll be awfully tough to replace him.

    He's doing this with average protection, no rushing attack and average tight end weapons. If the kid (TE) from Tech slips, we better get him in the early second (wishful thinking).


    Sure, you can draft a QB in the third. It'll be a high third and you will probably get good value in a qb deep draft pool.


    Edit: If the Texans do decide to draft a QB in the first, my gut feeling is that it'll be Hundley if he's still on the board. Anyone follow UCLA around here? Paging Yoyo.
     
    #77 sammy, Nov 11, 2013
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2013
  18. sportsfan786

    sportsfan786 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2013
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    1
    We're in Andrew Luck's division, do we really want to go up against him every year without an equally studly QB? This is the draft to get that QB. Look how many holes Luck can cover up on the Colts and tell me our biggest need outweighs getting a franchise QB.
     
  19. Ziggy

    Ziggy QUEEN ANON

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    37,264
    Likes Received:
    13,730
    You've been watching too much Big 12. I want the TE from Washington. That guy was NFL-ready as a senior in HS. He was by far the standout player on the field when Baylor played Washington (look who's watching Big 12 now, lulz) and RG3 and both RB's had great games.
     
  20. DonnyMost

    DonnyMost Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2003
    Messages:
    48,943
    Likes Received:
    19,843
    Not saying you're wrong. But Keenum basically outplayed Luck last week.

    No idea why anyone wouldn't feel confident going toe to toe with the Colts if we had a new RT and kicker.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now