1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Dems Agree to Drop Government-Run Insurance Option

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by MojoMan, Dec 8, 2009.

  1. MojoMan

    MojoMan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    7,746
    Likes Received:
    2,153
    More likely, Senator Palpatine is his father.

    Which would make Senator Obama the son of a Sith Lord.

    Perhaps Senator Lieberman is covertly trying to take over the Republic.

    Wait a minute....I know how this story ends.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,804
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    oh lieberman, how will you best be remembered.

    I'm going to remember you best in Jordan, helping the Republican Senator from Arizona, who was supposed to be the experienced one on foreign affairs whispering sweet Shia/Sunnis in his ear during the campaign.
     
  3. mc mark

    mc mark Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    471
    Lieberman reveals he apposed Medicare buy-in because Liberals liked the idea too much.

    And he [Lieberman] said he was particularly troubled by the overly enthusiastic reaction to the proposal by some liberals, including Representative Anthony Weiner, Democrat of New York, who champions a fully government-run health care system.

    “Congressman Weiner made a comment that Medicare-buy in is better than a public option, it’s the beginning of a road to single-payer,” Mr. Lieberman said. “Jacob Hacker, who’s a Yale professor who is actually the man who created the public option, said, ‘This is a dream. This is better than a public option. This is a giant step.’”
     
  4. MojoMan

    MojoMan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    7,746
    Likes Received:
    2,153
    Looks like the Senate is going to have to add the prohibitions on abortion funding to get Senator Nelson's vote.

    Also, they whole Senate is going to have to pass an amendment removing the public option from the Senate version of the bill, which should be interesting to watch. For that vote, we can expect to see most of the people who are in favor of the public option voting to eliminate it, and most of the people who are against the public option voting to retain it.

    Several other blue dog Senators are also uncommitted on this bill due to cost considerations, Including Claire McCaskill, which include costs to consumers and not just the cost to the government.

    [RQUOTER]Nelson: 'I'm not on the bill'

    The White House meeting Tuesday between President Barack Obama and Senate Democrats has raised expectations that they have nailed down 60 votes for the health care bill.

    But as he prepared to leave for the White House with other senators, Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) told POLITICO the deal wasn't done.

    "I’m not on the bill," said Nelson, who spoke with Obama earlier Tuesday. "I have spoken with the president and he knows they are not wrapped up today. I think everybody understands they are not wrapped up today and that impression will not be given."

    Obama is scheduled to make a statement after the meeting, which is expected to last more than an hour.

    Nelson said he still has concerns about the abortion language, as well as other issues.[/RQUOTER]
     
  5. rhadamanthus

    rhadamanthus Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    14,304
    Likes Received:
    596
    Business as usual continues in congress.
     
  6. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,095
    Likes Received:
    3,606
    The Dems remind me of an abused spouse who keeps taking it. Time to cut the cord. Take away that jerks committee asignments. The GOP would not put up with this bs.
     
  7. MojoMan

    MojoMan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    7,746
    Likes Received:
    2,153
    What is more likely is that Lieberman actually negotiates expanded powers and privileges for himself in connection with his agreement to vote for the final bill, whatever that ultimately consists of.
     
  8. MojoMan

    MojoMan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    7,746
    Likes Received:
    2,153
    I agree with Governor Dean that this bill should be killed. Of course, I have different reasons for thinking that than he does.

    [RQUOTER]Dean Urges Dems to Kill Senate Bill

    Howard Dean is urging Democrats to kill the Senate healthcare bill.

    Dean had praised last week's compromise that substituted a Medicare buy-in for the public option. But the decision to remove the buy-in provision to placate Joe Lieberman has turned the Vermont Democrat against the legislation.

    "This is essentially the collapse of health care reform in the United States Senate," Dean said in an interview set to air tonight, according to Greg Sargent. "Honestly the best thing to do right now is kill the Senate bill, go back to the House, start the reconciliation process, where you only need 51 votes and it would be a much simpler bill.”

    Using budget reconciliation would lower the legislative threshold for passing a bill, but would also present a number of procedural headaches for Democrats.

    John Podesta, Chief of Staff to Bill Clinton, has predicted Democrats may take a second look at reconciliation. But President Obama's statement this afternoon suggests the White House is more eager to push through the bill that's on the table now.

    A number of other progressives, such as Congressional Progressive Caucus chairman Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.) have also come out against the legislation.[/RQUOTER]
     
  9. pgabriel

    pgabriel Educated Negro

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2002
    Messages:
    43,804
    Likes Received:
    3,709
    goodness, this is how legislation should work, I don't know what some of you guys expect, you can't make people do crap they don't want even if they are democrats.

    if some dems are scared to vote for these progressive measures, what can you do? this is more about the system, needing a sixty-forty majority to avoid filibuster is ridiculous.
     
  10. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,095
    Likes Received:
    3,606
    The Dems need to keep pushing Medicare for 55 plus crowd, even if they lose. Let the issue be known. I have many friends in this group and they were ecstatic. Many have spouses who are not working due to age dsicrimination, health problems etc. Some are just keeping their job because of the health insurance and would like to be a consultant or start their own business, but need the corporate backed insurance etc. I'm sure there are folks who just have enough money and would go for early retirement , but can't risk going without insurance.

    This move will hurt any of you under 55 crowed who might like to be promoted to the positions of any of the folks above you who are just holding the job primarily for insurance purposes.

    I know all the conservatives and libertarians are fantastically talented, smart and already at the top of the food chain in their late 20's and 30's. :(

    Most likely just blinded by conservative think tank/pr talking points widely distrbuted to the point where it just seems like common sense or the way the world just is.
     
  11. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,095
    Likes Received:
    3,606
    Howard Dean says Senate Bill is not worth passing.
    ********
    Howard Dean says ‘Kill the Senate bill!’
    US politician and physician Howard Dean (C) wi...

    Image by AFP/Getty Images via Daylife

    In a pre-recorded interview given today by Howard Dean and set to air at 5:30pm EST on Vermont Public Radio, Dean has called for the Senate health care bill to be put to death as it no longer proposes enough reform to make a difference. Dean’s comments come in reaction to what appears to be the Democratic Caucus’ decision to remove both the Medicare buy-in and a public option from the Senate health care reform package.

    In an excerpt of the interview given by Vermont Public Radio to Greg Sargent of The Plum Line blog on whorunsgov.com, Dean says –

    This is essentially the collapse of health care reform in the United States Senate. Honestly the best thing to do right now is kill the Senate bill, go back to the House, start the reconciliation process, where you only need 51 votes and it would be a much simpler bill.

    http://trueslant.com/rickungar/2009/12/15/howard-dean-says-‘kill-the-senate-bill’/
     
  12. Bandwagoner

    Bandwagoner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    27,106
    Likes Received:
    3,757
    So at this point is it possible to just put through a bill that fixes buying out of state and does away with pre-existing conditions?

    Instead of scrapping everything why not run through the insurance regulations and take another run at the other stuff later?
     
  13. mc mark

    mc mark Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    471
    If there is not going to be a PO or Medicare buy-in then the mandate requiring people to buy healthcare should be dropped.

    this is getting worse and worse
     
  14. Bandwagoner

    Bandwagoner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    27,106
    Likes Received:
    3,757
    yeah if it isn't i think the insurance company job market will be expanding.
     
  15. mc mark

    mc mark Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    471
    That's what they are doing. There is still a lot of good in the bill (that's why it's going to pass). It just won't be the sweeping change progressives were hoping for.
     
  16. Bandwagoner

    Bandwagoner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    27,106
    Likes Received:
    3,757
    Doesn't it have the mandates though? If it is now just insurance company reform then what is the problem? Why do they want to scuttle it? They still have this super majority through 2010 at least.
     
  17. mc mark

    mc mark Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 1999
    Messages:
    26,195
    Likes Received:
    471

    rumors have it that democrats pass what they can now and then pass the PO attached to a future spending bill through reconciliation.
     
  18. MojoMan

    MojoMan Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    7,746
    Likes Received:
    2,153
    It is not just insurance company reform. This is still an extremely intrusive bill that establishes substantial government control over the health care sector. There are something like 118 government panels that are assigned to oversee different aspects of the implementation of this bill. There is around $500 Billion in cuts to the Medicare program, which according to the Democrats, will achieved solely through reducing waste fraud and abuse in Medicare. There are also around $400 Billion in tax increases.

    This is still a very bad bill, which is going to be colossally expensive, and that will accomplish exactly none of the objectives that initially justified the initiation of this so-called "reform" effort.

    The bill should be killed. Dead.
     
  19. A_3PO

    A_3PO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    46,872
    Likes Received:
    12,473
    This is what will likely happen sometime in the future if the Dems retain the majority for a while. The single-payer zealots need screw their heads back on because the world won't end with this bill.
     

Share This Page