further proof that bush supporters have no sense of irony. trader, you continue to support a president who was a male cheerleader in college while there was a war going on. you continue to support a president who planted a gay male hooker in the white house press corp and allowed him to visit the white house over 200 times. you continue to support a president who likes to stroll through flowery meadows hand-in-hand w/ saudi princes. you support a president who likes to play dress-up cowboy on his fake ranch, but according to vincente fox, is actually scared of horses. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/21/wbush121.xml i dont support edwards at all, but i find it a never-ending source of amusement that people who still support someone like bush would go around calling others effeminate. ps - i cut my own hair and that does make me more manly than everyone else.
I prefer Hillary; but similarly I wouldn't mind an Administration with any, or all, of these three. Whoever wins the nom is going to have some good, strong support behind them.
Sorry, I was a wee bit intoxicated when I posted that last night. I agree it was an exaggeration saying he would be no better than W, I don't think anyone could possibly be that bad again. How I really feel is that Edwards is my least favorite of any of the candidates on the Dem side. He sounds way too much like a lawyer to me and not like someone who is prepared to lead our country. I just get an uneasy feeling every time I hear him speak and I'm not quite sure why. I'll support the nominee no matter who it is from this group, but my hope is that it's either Hillary or Obama.
Gee, it's not like he would try and torpedo a Dem administration. Any Dem that would trust Cheney as a diplomatic envoy to perhaps the most dangerous diplomatic problem we have is not fit for the presidency.
I have been very dissapointed in Richardson but out of the Dems he is still my favorite and if the primary poll were today I woudl support him. That may change if he doesn't do better. I don't have a second choice at the moment.
Hillary is now against giving licenses to illegal immigrants. It was interesting watching them go for each other's throats. I guess they are not above the fray after all. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071116...te_analysis;_ylt=AgmMSL8prDaZbEOsBPcI.8ms0NUE
How does Chris Dodd not have more support? He was head and shoulders better than his competition last night. Our media-driven circus that is politics today really stacks the deck against people without national name recognition. And of course those with early national name recognition try to capitalize on it by raising huge $$$ early and attempting to push the 'inevitability' theme on people. Hillary is not the best the Dems can do. It's a sad indictment of our system that she is going to be the nominee.
voted obama. i think hed CRUSH any repub in the general election. hed probably steal a lot of republican vote while hes at it. i think edwards has no chance in the general election. hillary is hard to read. i can definately see her winning the general election but it would be a NASTY fight. obama/clinton ticket sounds good but i doubt hillary would agree to playing second fiddle. also, listening to obamas speeches, i dont think he would want to tie his political future to clinton. obama/gore ticket would be interesting. obama/powell ticket would be interesting also but powell is a repub. i doubt powell would cross party lines.
LOL...Hussein Obama would get exposed for the fraud he is. He's tripped all over himself in these debates. The guy is just not ready for the big leagues at this point. A lot of people like a well-spoken Half-rican American, however! Once they get past that sizzle, there's not much left.
im not gonna even try to reason w/ you. think what you want. the repubs have shot themselves in the foot so many times over the last 7 yrs that even a guy named benedict arnold could get elected...
Nice find, but I have a question. Does it need a minimum contribution to show up? My $50 contribution to Ron Paul doesn't show up.
I'm voting for Hillary because I think she is the most pragmatic. She lives in the real world where everyone has their own agenda and I think she can bring the different sides to the table. She doesn't rush into decisions and thinks things through from pragmatic stand point. I want my president to think with their brain and not with their gut.
I can't dissuade you from such a rash decision. You are "voting for Hillary because I think she is the most pragmatic" -- she is, if your definition of pragmatic is looking for the solution that will put the most money in her personal pocketbook. "She lives in the real world where everyone has their own agenda and I think she can bring the different sides to the table" -- Hillary has her own agenda, in spades, and it doesn't include doing anything for the American people. How can she bring the different sides to the table when she doesn't believe in different sides. There is only one side -- hers -- and she "will deck" (her words) anybody who gets in her way. Lastly, you say she may not rush into decisions, but that is only because she has to flip her waffle over several times before it gets served up. Vote anybody but Hillary!
You can accuse the Clintons of a lot of stuff, but pushing policies for personal enrichment is not one of them.
Rimmy, you know I luv ya, but........ bwhaaahahahahahaha...bwhaaahahahahahaha! Apologies...I just couldn't hold that in.
