1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

  2. ROCKETS GAMEDAY
    Reed Sheppard and the Rockets open up Summer League play. Come join us at 9:00 pm CT!

    LIVE! Summer League Action

Debates. What are they good for?

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by jiggyfly, Feb 20, 2020.

  1. rocketsjudoka

    rocketsjudoka Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    58,169
    Likes Received:
    48,342
    In a crowded field the debates give candidates a chance to stand out. In a smaller field in the general election they don't do much as by then most people know where the candidates stand already and don't need to hear them articulate it. In fact there have been several debates where a candidate did terribly but still won the election.

    That said in close elections a debate performance can make a difference, usually for the negative if a candidate has a bad debate. For example in this primary Joe Biden's poor debate performances have probably been the biggest factor in his drop.

    One other thing about debates and this election is showing that more is that debates are a fundraising opportunity and we've seen that in the last two debates where candidates have boasted how much money they raised off of the debates.
     
  2. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,070
    Likes Received:
    15,247
    One thing I'd add, at least for this go-round, the debate qualifications has been used as a viability proxy. Candidates who struggled to qualify for debates got branded as not viable, which makes polling and fundraising harder, which makes qualifying for the next debate harder in a vicious cycle. It has perhaps raised the barrier to entry too high for good late entrants (unless you have scads of money), but it's had a pretty effective winnowing effect on a field everyone complained was too wide.
     
  3. RayRay10

    RayRay10 Houstonian

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2015
    Messages:
    4,629
    Likes Received:
    11,032
    I sort of agree and sort of disagree with this article. I think Biden should debate Trump, however, I think they should have one debate and have a fact-checker present. Hell, Trump can choose Joe Rogan to moderate if he wants...as long as the fact checker is allowed to check both candidates facts immediately after a point is discussed.

    https://pressrun.media/p/why-trump-doesnt-deserve-a-biden

    Why Trump doesn't deserve a Biden debate
    Stop normalizing him

    More at the link above
     
    deb4rockets likes this.
  4. deb4rockets

    deb4rockets Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2013
    Messages:
    25,031
    Likes Received:
    32,325
    I agree 100%. If the candidates were fact checked during the debates, then lying wouldn't suit their purpose to hide the facts and deceive the naive for a vote. I think a fact check on Trump is necessary, because lying and deceiving is his game.
     
    #24 deb4rockets, Sep 24, 2020
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2020
    RayRay10 likes this.
  5. Ziggy

    Ziggy QUEEN ANON

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 1999
    Messages:
    37,287
    Likes Received:
    13,751
    Between Rogan & Trump, the fact-checker would be so busy, Biden wouldn't even get a chance to talk. They'd probably need an entire team of fact checkers.
     
    RayRay10 likes this.

Share This Page