Explain how Scott McClennan is clinically insane or apologize for all your nasty words when the rest of us were right all along. McClennan was late, no doubt. But his book is the final proof. We were right from the beginning and all along. And the rest of you were teh crazy suck. It's not a great fight to win - 4K Americans died for it - but maybe an acknowledement that we were right and the rest of you were horribly, horrilbly wrong would lead to avoiding the same mistake in Iran or elsewere. Main thing though (as of today anyway): Oh, you guys suck. You suck so freaking bad. It this stuff had come out about somebody on my side you could be sure I'd give out appropriate ****. You guys just seem incapable of same. You are like very, very dumb robots. Read a book. Read this one. You will be so very and incredibly embarassed.
I guess it isn't the world's biggest stretch, but I swear to the Almighty, I almost made that exact same post. I might have capitalized the "f", but otherwise, EXACTLY the same.
This thread has the potential for GREATNESS. Particularly when Bats wakes up at the crack of noon to discover what he did.
GREATNESS, indeed. [rquoter] On the book critical of the Bush White House written in cooperation with former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, “The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House, and the Education of Paul O’Neill,” McClellan said on January 12, 2004: McCLELLAN: “It appears to be more about trying to justify personal views and opinions than it does about looking at the results that we are achieving on behalf of the American people.” McClellan also took issue with the book by former Bush White House counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke, “Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror,” on March 22, 2004: McCLELLAN: Well, why, all of a sudden, if he had all these grave concerns, did he not raise these sooner? This is one-and-a-half years after he left the administration. And now, all of a sudden, he’s raising these grave concerns that he claims he had. And I think you have to look at some of the facts. One, he is bringing this up in the heat of a presidential campaign. He has written a book and he certainly wants to go out there and promote that book. …[/rquoter]
Just wanted to memorialize this prior to Bats hitting the tylenol jar and coming to.... Of course, Bats, thespian that he is, is incapable of recognizing the business proposition of McClellan writing an exaggerated, embellished, tell-all book and catering to the angry, latte-sipping, erudite Barnes & Noble libs... You want dumb robots? How about the pseudo-intellectual libs supporting a candidate with no experience of policy initiatives, change, or honesty? You want dumb robots? How about reducing the War on Terror to bumper sticker logic and ignoring the geopolitical consequences of a long-term, stable Middle East? You can't just wish terror and instability away, which is why Congress voted to go into Iraq, and is why we must carefully weigh our strategy there. Dumb robots take the easy way out and just want to give up and run home, consequences be darned... Dumb Robot? How about demagoguing the efforts of our troops and not saying a single positive thing for 6 years about their efforts? That's a dumb robot for you. You want dumb robots? How about going to get liquored up and deciding that their best use of time at that point is to go post on an internet debate forum. GREATNESS
You need not read more than 4 words to recognize that your statement is wrong. Bats didn't even get his name right.
i thought it was bc of wmds. no wait, it was bc of al qaida. wait... it was bc we have to establish a democracy in iraq... im all confused... didnt we accomplish the mission already?
Basso and TJ of the Bush school. They're proud that they don't change their opinion as new and important facts come to light. What is interesting is that Sadam's Iraq told the truth they did not have nuclear weapons and the Bush gang lied that they did. Don't forget about the Niger uranium hoax that Bush and Powell perpetrated.
And the United States of America essentially assassinated a sovereign leader of another country in front of the entire world.
i just love this sovereign leader crap, like saddam were mandela or some ****. it's alternately hilarious and sad to watch the modern democratic party abandon every inch of moral high ground in it's jihad against george bush. Crazies, indeed.
