1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Day 1 FA Meetings

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by glenadyll, Jun 27, 2023.

  1. O-dawg

    O-dawg Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 1999
    Messages:
    658
    Likes Received:
    1,315
    Know you sometimes hear things @Nook, would be curious to know if you've heard something specific regarding Brooks.

    I for one really don't want to see another wing added to the team. If we can't find a quality rotation with Jalen, Jabari, Tari, KPJ, KMJ, Cam, Amen, or Tate then one or multiple even should be moved before we sign another wing.
     
  2. Bo6

    Bo6 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2010
    Messages:
    4,352
    Likes Received:
    6,867
    we need at Vet PG that can be happy as a bench player and start when we pickup some injuries. FVV is not that and would create a lot of problems with our roster construction. There isn't many playmaking opportunities available with Sengun/KPJ/Amen all trying to get ball touches. FVV would basically mean the end of KPJ which would hurt his trade value from an asset stand point. not even mentioning that the club also already invested a first round pick on Tyty and a year of development on Nix.

    i would be shocked if we signed a PG to any kinds of money in excess of the MLE. money is much better spent upgrading the 4/5 spot and another wing utility defender provided we are shipping out KJM/Tate.


    Trade KJM/Tate + Cap space (absorb bad contract) for future draft pick
    Sign any 2 of the following : Johnson/Lopez/Hachimura/Kuzma/Brooks/Lowry

    and we are sitting niiiice.
     
    O-dawg likes this.
  3. mikenm268

    mikenm268 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2018
    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    959
    ‘Huge mistake’ for just two years? I dont want to be paying him huge money for a long deal, but I’m fine with a two year over pay to add an adult to the team.
     
  4. AroundTheWorld

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2000
    Messages:
    83,288
    Likes Received:
    62,280
    OK as long as it is just two years - fine, I guess.
     
  5. jch1911

    jch1911 Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    5,824
    Likes Received:
    7,282
    [​IMG]
     
  6. jordnnnn

    jordnnnn Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    11,410
    Likes Received:
    12,647
    [​IMG]
     
  7. carl_herrera

    carl_herrera Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2023
    Messages:
    716
    Likes Received:
    1,909
    Yes we can.

    FVV $40M year 1 into cap space.
    Lopez $25M year into cap space.
    Dillon Brooks S&T for Tate + Josh Christopher + SRP, starting salary can be up to $16.5M

    Then you’d still have the $7.5M room exception.
     
  8. krosfyah

    krosfyah Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    7,781
    Likes Received:
    1,568
    It seems folks still don't understand the Rockets are below the salary floor.

    Folks on here keep saying player X isn't worth the $. It either goes to Adam Silver or it goes to, say, FVV. Last time I checked, FVV is a much better player than Adam Silver.

    The main consideration is length of contract, not the $ amount.
     
  9. Russjr2

    Russjr2 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,794
    Likes Received:
    1,171
    No sir. In my opinion he is not the kind of vet we need on this team. He was never a winner and he was always the type of guy joking and playing around too much. That is not the type of influence this team needs. We need vets that have won before and know what it takes to win games in the NBA. And they still have some skill left to actually be on the court producing..
     
    Drift Monkey likes this.
  10. jayfree

    jayfree Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2015
    Messages:
    7,399
    Likes Received:
    10,171
    I see the Rockets have an A-list budget but looking at C-list actors. I hope the script is good at least.
     
  11. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    15,273
    Likes Received:
    18,486
    thanks for explaining that. Giving up assets for Brooks makes me even more nauseous than just signing him outright.
     
  12. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59,708
    Likes Received:
    132,009
    Your GM is very enamored with Brooks - and really wants him. It is probably the worst kept secret in basketball that Stone wants to sign him.

    I would hope Stone doesn't overpay - but who knows.
     
  13. ThatBoyNick

    ThatBoyNick Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    31,082
    Likes Received:
    48,649
    After signing Amen, Cam, waiving Nix, removing Martin, and Tate's salaries (I'm assuming trades) Rockets would then effectively have 74.5 million to spend in FA (I'm ignoring the roster minimum cap holds as that would apply to the salaries of our signings)

    Starting salaries distributed from 74.5 million (on 2-year deals, with a .05% contract increase for the 2nd year)

    39 (2/80) for Fred (His max)

    21 (2/42) for Brook

    14.5 (2/30) for Dillon

    + a post cap space R-MLE (2/15) for an additional free agent

    The money seemingly works as long as we can clear Tate's contract.
     
    DeBeards, larry cook and Jow like this.
  14. RocketsFido

    RocketsFido Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2013
    Messages:
    10,412
    Likes Received:
    12,601
    I'm still a huge NO on FVV and if we trade anyone, I hope they go to the east.

    I strongly think we need to pursue Tyus Jones on the Wizards, they got like 3 point guards and are doing a full rebuild.
     
    persian hoopa likes this.
  15. Deuce

    Deuce Context & Nuance

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Messages:
    26,597
    Likes Received:
    35,712
    I think we have to conclude not just Stone but Udoka. I can't image a single FA move on this team that doesn't directly go through what Udoka wants in terms of players in team building. After that, it is up to Stone to come up with the contracts that he likes to make them market friendly for trading purposes down the road for optionality.
     
    Nook likes this.
  16. jayfree

    jayfree Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2015
    Messages:
    7,399
    Likes Received:
    10,171
    I would say it has something to do with the Rockets trading Dillon Brooks rights away after the draft for only a future 2nd rounder, but Morey was involved in that.
     
  17. sealclubber1016

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    21,302
    Likes Received:
    34,202
    Dillion Brooks,thinks he's better than he is, talks a lot of game he can't back, inefficient yet want a lot of shots.

    Stone is gonna prove what a trash GM he is the second we have to start building a team to actually try and win.
     
    Drift Monkey likes this.
  18. Bobbythegreat

    Bobbythegreat Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2013
    Messages:
    68,479
    Likes Received:
    31,946
    Dillon Brooks is such a bad idea, but I do think it has comedy value. Give me a lineup of Amen, Green, Brooks, Smith, and Sengun. Let's create the worst shooting lineup in modern NBA history.
     
    BreakYoSelfFool likes this.
  19. Nook

    Nook Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    59,708
    Likes Received:
    132,009
    I agree with this - the Rockets are not spending any appreciable amount on a player that Udoka does not like.
     
  20. ROXTXIA

    ROXTXIA Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2000
    Messages:
    20,841
    Likes Received:
    12,919
    Well, lazy journalism. $1,500,000 isn't much now, but he'll want a big raise next season, so if we trade him now and get something....
     
    jch1911 likes this.

Share This Page