David Letterman blackmailed over sleeping with staffers

I've learned a lot not reading this thread.

 

You obviously don't know anything about David Letterman, Cheetah. For shame!

 

Did those sentences make sense in your head before you typed them out? Because that unintelligible garble effectively derailed the thread, or do you not notice that each post following this is mocking you and the direction this thread has gone.

The Internet aint hard. I'll put it simply, if you have something to say about Letterman post it. If you dont keep your mouth shut instead of posting random crap that has nothing to do with anything, and honestly makes you look like a psycho.

You sound like a nutcase, you're opposed to discussing Letterman on the Letterman thread (because that's crazy obviously) you'd rather fixate on me instead, and make inane declarations on the nature of "knowing" after admitting you really cant disagree or have an opinion on what's been posted.

you're an asset. no doubt. smart too, making yourself look really good throwing your tantrum.

 

Lol. Wow.

I'm not too worried, bloopy, about being the 'nutcase' here between the two of us, especially after that last post. I'm sure though, imagining sexual aggression by David Letterman and wanting people to 'shut their mouth' on the Internet makes you completely stable.

Rant away though bloops, maybe one day the world will see you for the great wiseman you are!

 

Seriously. at this point are you mad I'm talking about Letterman? Or mad that I'm not talking more about you? You seem to want to make this thread your own personal mailbox to me... whenever the subject is Dave (as per the title of this thread) you seem to take it very hard.

Before you keep going on 1)I'm a dude 2)I'm not homosexual.

Just stay on topic, Casanova.

 

Now you're making weird Out-of-nowhere homosexual jokes/coming on to me? What in the world...

Dude, what is wrong with you?

 

Do you think you can manage to make one post on topic?

Still fixated on me...

 

Your stuff is Internet Trolling 101 dude. It's old hat.

I've made my point on the Letterman assertion you made and you can't counter it, hence your last few posts. You are pulling stuff out of your ass and are mad someone pointed that out.

Now, we can keep going like this (ie your attempts at being clever amusing me) if you want; that's up to you.

Otherwise, it's been an entertaining Wednesday morning.

 

So he got some...good for him...problem was he didn't think she'd go crazy on his arse...

 

If you want to make your first intelligible post about Letterman you are free to. If you want to keep making yourself look entirely ignorant and ill mannered you are free to do that as well. If you're interested in actually contributing to the discussion, I'm willing to help you with those big words you have trouble with.

If I were truly trolling, instead of being nice to you and giving you an out by constantly redirecting you to contribute to the discussion, I'd post how how much of verbal imbecile you seem to be (although I'm certain you're nice IRL). You realize that "Discussion/comments on coming to 'cocksure' unfounded conclusions on the subject of David Letterman...in a thread about David Letterman? You really need some help with that one, dude?" isn't actually a sentence right?

I mean, what inbred Arkansas mother-lover managed to bang the following out on the keyboard?

Truer words have never been spoken about the possibility of certain things. the point is, it's just logical. at this moment.

epic sentence?
or epic poster?

 

Cuz I'm a mother-lover, you're a mother-lover, we should *BEEP* each others mothers...each OTHERS MOOOOOMS!

 

Oh boy. I wonder why you think your performance in this thread gives your opinion of the intelligence of others any weight. Or what you even think you are accomplishing, for that matter.

I made my point about Letterman pretty simple, even though you seem to not get it. Since I am a nice guy, though, I'll repeat it for you once more. In your initial rant you said

Which I said was unfounded and was just a conclusion you had drawn, and that there was no signs of that at the time.

My 'possibilities' comment was actually just me being nice and trying to say you could very well be right, just that there was no way of knowing it for fact.

That's it. Simple. Straightforward

Of course, your counter is that we all 'Don't Know Letterman' and you continued to get more and more belligerent after that.

However, considering all of this:

I guess I should have realized I shouldn't even have wasted my time with your mania for this topic. Your issues go beyond an Internet messageboard thread and I can't help you with any of that. I'm sure you'll keep ranting away trying to insult me hoping it will make you look better, but I'll leave that to you. We're done here.

 

Well third time's the charm right? After announcing your quitting of the thread 3 dramatic timesm this time you can dooo eeet.

Sorry it did not work out for you, better luck next time. At least you wont have to be bothered by people actually discussing Letterman on the Letterman's thread.

lol damn straight get this thread back on track

 

please please please please tell me what you're on, bro. I want some of it asap!

 

This guy sounds like he he needs anger management classes or something.