This is a myth, probably perpetuated by fat chicks. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...-myth-of-zaftig-marilyn-virginia-postrel.html
A lot of those women in the OP are still attractive to be sure. But do I think they'd look better if they were thing? Heck yes. If Kate Upton put on some more pounds she'd probably still look good. And you guys would still claim 'would hit'. But does she look better now or with another 30 pounds on her? Some would say with more but most would say now.
Not suprising. Humans were smaller back in these days when we were biologically closer to our monkey ancestors.
There has been far too many letters and numbers and not enough jpegs and gifs. Someone, please correct this massive oversight.
These ladies are EASILY 118lbs+. They are well endowed with a healthy bottom half to boot. My gf is 5'6" and wears XS to S clothing (Fits them VERY WELL I MIGHT ADD) and she's 117. She's much slimmer than these women. And for the record FAP FAP FAP on those ladies. They look good. If they trimmed up they'd look VERY good.
I would marry them all, twice at night and once more in the morning. Edit: I actually don't like the one in the top left.
Wish I could edit my post: I forgot these girls are models and are pretty tall, 5'8 minimum would be my guess.
Ashley Graham, who is the one you should recognize from the Lane Bryant lingerie commercial, is a size 16. Like another poster said, they probably weigh between 160-190lbs. Would I sleep with these women? Yes Would I call them ideal? No Standing up these women look better. I think they could all use to lose 30-50lbs if they wanted to be perfect.
I would hit. None of those women have a 22" waist and weigh 118 lbs. Marilyn Monroe would not be a size 12 in today's clothes. Seventy years ago, a size 12 meant 22" waist. Due to vanity sizing, a size 12 in 2011 is several inches more than 70 years ago. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,57672,00.html