Believing is "God" doesn't mean believing in the Reliqious God. I believe there is a "God" more to the intelligent kind of way. A "God" to me as in a superior species in a scientific explanation. That include Einstein and many other physicists.
No, believing in something which has no evidence is still idiotic. You're just playing cute with two immaterial concepts that have virtually nothing to do with each other. Problem with that is that you can prove your "love" through actions, words, etc. edit* or apparently, a freaking MRI (just as you can prove your "faith") But "love" has different meaning to different people... whereas "faith" does not....
If you will spring for an fMRI machine, proving it would be trivial. It would just involve reproducing results that have been demonstrated countless times in the past.
There was a "blind" inspection of a dinosaur bone at the university of arizona a few years ago. They didn't tell the University because if they knew what it was, it would array their findings. The result was the dinosaur bone was no more then a couple thousand years old. Thus meaning men SAW dinosaurs.
This link will explain everything you need to know about ToyCen428: http://bbs.clutchfans.net/showthread.php?t=177814
"In 1990, samples of various dinosaur bones were submitted for Carbon-14 dating to the University of Arizona’s department of geosciences’ laboratory of isotope geochemistry. Bones from an Allosaurus and an Acrocanthosaurus were among those sent to the university’s testing facilities to undergo a “blind” dating procedure (which means that the technicians performing the tests did not know that the bones had come from dinosaurs). Not realizing that the samples were from dinosaurs prevented “evolutionary bias,” and helped ensure that the results were as accurate as possible (within the recognized assumptions and limits of the C-14 dating method). We have in our possession—on the official stationery of the University of Arizona—a copy of the test results for the Allosaurus bones (see reproduction at right, sample B). Amazingly, the oldest C-14 date assigned to those bones was a mere 16,120 years (and only 23,760 years for the Acrocanthosaurus fossils; see Dahmer, et al., 1990). Both dates are a far cry from the millions of years that evolutionists suggest should be assigned to dinosaur fossils. "
no doubt. however it wasn't my intention to present the passage as evidence of God's existence, but more as a reasoning of faith.
Do universities really use hand drawn seals on their 'official stationary'? And yes, I'm serious, because I find it hard to believe anyone would stick that on there unless 'that's the way it's done.'
