I think you just proved Nook right. I am not a Christian, but I know the basic teachings of Jesus Christ and the way he lived his life are not what anyone - and I mean anyone - here does. Of all the posters on this D&D thing, I'd say RocketsJudoka is the best follower of Christ on here. I don't know his religion, but my point is all these cartoons you post from the site isn't what Jesus Christ is about. It's what Christianity as a church is about. The real blasphemy is that all these prophets and enlightened men were against the very things their so-called followers created.
Look, I say this with nothing but love in my heart, but you're going to burn in eternal damnation for starting that thread.
Is it so hard to understand that Jesus supported the most progressive human rights of his time? And if you are to live like Jesus then you should support the most progressive human rights of your time? Jesus bro, I'm not even Christian and I can see how regressive your views are compared to Jesus' views. It's so sad how you "rejoined" Christianity as a grown ass man with the internet at your disposal and this is what you accepted as his teachings. Christianity would never have existed if Jesus sided with the most traditional values in the context of when he lived.
Doesn't it say in Leviticus that "those who do not return thine carts to their proper place shall suffer the wrath of the just and shed innumerable tears unto the hard ground."
According to Mathloom, Jesus would totally support abortion because of women's rights. I'm not here to convince you guys, I can't change people. I can't change my friends or family's behavior. That's out of my control.
How about Jesus would totally understand how a women could get into a position of wanting an abortion and would not judge or support law to punish?
I feel like it's time to share this again: <iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/pCTAgxsLE3Q" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Exactly. Jesus would, if New Testament Gospels are to be wholly believed, would "side" with the concerns of the woman more often than not (at least in a social context)...especially given the patriarchal nature of the Jewish community at the time. He wouldn't "judge" a woman's actions in a vacuum...particularly actions in which a man was just as complicit. Seeking "justice" without mercy (and devoid or dismissive of context―either historical or cultural) is nothing more than self-aggrandizing polemic.
