So it wasnt about cute little baby adoptions?. my theory..trump also wrote the pickle letter. , the highly credible source who told him the black man's birth certificate is fake is really him. jim, the other imaginary friend and the imaginary friend that talked to the newspaper about his love life are all his creations. the president of mexico who calls him is also in his head. So far that's 5 people that we know of that exist in his mind. He's like Chris broussard!
Oh, that undisclosed meeting between Trump and Putin at G20? One day before Trump dictated his son's misleading statement about "adoption" meeting with Russian lawyer at Trump Tower (btw, Natasha Bertrand is another good follow on twitter)... Trump discussed adoption policy with Putin one day before 'dictating' son's statement about 'adoptions' http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-jr-statement-adoptions-putin-meeting-2017-8 Semi unrelated but interesting: Rob Goldstone updated his Facebook about a Trump Tower meeting, apparently just before going into the meeting.
Talk about conspiracy nuts. Our own Democrat party has really raised the bar on that this time around.
Inexplicably trying to lift sanctions on Russia, firing the FBI director and admitting it was done to stop the Russia investigation, having multiple campaign officials meet with representatives of the Russian government and lie about it, having Trump's son meet with a lawyer affiliated with the Russian government in order to gain dirt on Hillary Clinton = nothing burger. Classified emails on a server = jail time. This is why it's hard to not just break down into hysterical laughter when reading posts from people like the two buffoons above.
We could post footage of Trump shooting someone on 5th Avenue and BTG would still say there was no evidence of wrongdoing.
I wish I could partial ignore BTG. Love his insight in GARM. My mother once told me, a little bit of knowledge is deadly. His posts here are the embodiment of that saying.
I know it's hard for people like you to understand, but what you posted about Trump is either not proven, essentially impossible to prove, or not against the law to begin with and the stuff about Clinton was absolutely against the law and it's completely proven that she committed those crimes..... so yeah, it's "nothing burger" vs "would be jail time if not for government corruption"
Try it and see. I've never been a fan of Trump's and I would view him being impeached as the best possible outcome.....that said, you guys have been seriously embarrassing yourselves being the new birthers without even realizing it.
So if Barack Obama had gone to James Comey last year and told him to let the investigation into Hillary's emails go and then fired him a few months later and admitted on national TV that it was because of the investigation into Hillary's emails, you would be totally okay with that?
Are we suggesting that no one from the Obama administration told Comey to let the investigation into Hillary go? I'm not sure that's a safe assumption given what we know. When you have absolute proof of multiple serious violations of the law and you suggest letting it go anyway going so far as to outright lie on their behalf, that's not something most people in Comey's situation would have done without some crazy political pressure. That said, that's not something you'd care about because politics.
No, because Hillary was guilty. Flynn was not. It's fact. FACT! (or i can start attacking you personally)
I did answer the question you simpleton. I'm saying that it's highly likely that someone from the Obama administration DID tell Comey to let the Hillary investigation go.... Point is that it's not something you care about and it's obviously not something I'm still harping on. Now did you follow along that time or do I have to break out the crayons for you?
I don't get it with that guy either. It's like an assisgnmet he has or game he is playing. Typing these long comments always bending this way and that way. Yes I don't like him (Trump) Hillary was awful too yes yes yes but nothing is proven. Something illegal though apparently is supposed to magically appear. But the DOJ should not be investigating. Nobody should follow anything going on with any connection with Trump's team and Russia because it means you are thirsty. Even things like Trump Jr saying would love intel on Clinton. Nope should not be discussed on a D&D forum. Given time and a little thought what I wrote can be twisted into some random stuff about something something. Or not what he is doing at all. That's what BTG does though. He typically always comes into the thread with the counterpoint or argument about most any topic.
Over a thread of 20 tweets, Seth Abramson (attorney, professor and news contributor) builds out a compelling case versus Trump based on new information reported. I wish there was a convenient way to combine the tweets into one essay. And yes... Abramson is another great follow on twitter. https://twitter.com/SethAbramson
LOL... Sarah Huckabee Sanders... Trump was just being a good dad..."like any father would do". 'Course, as bad as my abusive dad was, he never tried to get me to perjure myself. So I reckon I can say my dad was better than Trump...
by risking jail for his son? Lawyers - I think we should tell the truth, nothing but the truth, to get ahead of the story. Trump - no way, we need to lies, nothing but lies, to protect me from more Russian stories. Let's do the cover up now and who care if they find out. My sons got great lawyers. The best. It will be so easy.
So, basically, the WH spokesperson confirmed the report that Trump authored Trump Junior's misleading statement. This after his lawyer (Jay Sekulow) said Trump did not write the statement. How much longer will congress allow this to continue?
