so does anyone under 30 have even the tiniest bit of discretion with respect to what they'll publish publicly? does deckard teach a writing class at duke on this topic?
Nope. I understand why she did it, the reactions from men calling her a "slut" will make a nice thesis case for her feminist diatribes. But since she's doing it to Duke douchebags, I'm inclined to laugh :grin:
I only skimmed through, but I call bull**** based on the fact that according to her, 10 out of the 13 guys had huge cocks (with another making up in girth what he lacked in length). It's pretty common knowledge that a very small percentage of the population is outside "average" size in one direction or the other. Chances are, she has a warped concept of what constitutes "large", or she's just making things up.
Much of the content is truncated off the end of slides. Anybody have a link to the original PPT file?
Just wait, someone will give her a reality show and she will make millions. It's America damnit. Stupidity, sluttiness, etc are handsomely rewarded.
Dang, you must be really interested in those guys' pros and cons! WHERE ARE THE CONS?? I MUST KNOW!!!
The later blocking of the names, and the ease with which the unblocked names could have been verified to actual Duke players, lends credence to this being legit. Yuck! A sad smirch to the fine reputation of those pious Duke athletes.
Suprised she has no complaints about his failure to use size to his advantage and subpar ball-handling skills leading to a lack of penetration, not to mention his tendency to stand in the corner and refusing to go backdoor. leebigez reminds of these things every day.
if she published a paper like this including information regarding my sons or someone i cared about, i might call her some names.
