we're only leading because t-mac decided he would try this game. his intensity level in this game compared to portland's game is completely opposite. dont worry he'll take the next game off.
He caught the ball, stared down his defender and tried to elevate. Yeah, he may have shot a three with the same type of coverage, in which case I would say that that's a lousy shot as well. What's your point? Compare those shots to the other shots he's been taking where he catches the ball with the defender trailing and takes a shot or drives to the basket. Look, T-Mac's obvioiusly thinking the Rockets are up by a bunch, so why not throw a heat check? It's not a major sin, unless it's repeated over and over. And obviously he's on the bench right now, so it's not going to be.
Landry would of helped us against Boozer in the playoffs....its a damn shame that Boozer played 100% on one side of the court. Hayes didnt present any type of threat!
Man.. no way I would mortgage our future (Brooks, Landry) in a trade for Artest or Kidd. These younger guys bring so much energy to the game.
first u said the defender rotated so the shots in the first quarter wasn't a bad shot. now u say he stared down his defender and faced the same type of coverage as a contested shot. my point is you said the shots he took in the first quarter were good, and the iso jumper he took v. salmons was not b/c it was contested. you obviously don't know what you are talking about. i'll stop responding.
