1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

Closing Days - the Legacy of the Bush Administration

Discussion in 'BBS Hangout: Debate & Discussion' started by thacabbage, Oct 26, 2008.

  1. thacabbage

    thacabbage Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    6,993
    Likes Received:
    145
    Blaming Iraq on a lack of intel eschews any neo-conservative influence. you could possibly blame bush for surrounding himself with the wrong people, but it's pretty clear that there was an active attempt to shape evidence around policy.
     
  2. thacabbage

    thacabbage Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    6,993
    Likes Received:
    145
    None of those things you listed compare to sitting idly while the nation prepared for war against itself.

    How is it not in league with Wilsonian principles? Neo-conservatism by definition sprouted from Wilsonianism. It's the very definition of the ideology. All considerations in regards to the conduct of the war or its immorality are irrelevant to that discussion.
     
  3. Space Ghost

    Space Ghost Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    18,198
    Likes Received:
    8,597
    The worst was "bring it on".

    What people fail to acknowledge is that bush entered his presidency at one of the worst times in our history. There are plenty of other presidents who would have botched it up worse than bush. On the same token, the left give clinton too much credit as he entered one of the best times in our history.
     
  4. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,128
    Likes Received:
    10,171
    I think sins of comission are worse.


    Neo-conservatism is not in line with Wilsonian principles. The neo-cons may have perverted some of Wilson's language to justify their positions and make it more palatable, and it may have become a codeword in certain circles, but to say we invaded Iraq to spread democracy and actually believe such claptrap flies in the face of the evidence we have on the subject. Democracy was either an afterthought or a tertiary reason for Iraq. Even if you assume that Wilsonian thought and Neo-con cons want the same end, there is no way Wilson would have even considered the means, much less try to justify such an obvious blunder.
     
  5. FranchiseBlade

    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    51,810
    Likes Received:
    20,467
    Good point. That surplus was the worst! The repeated quarters of domestic growth sucked big time, I repeat BIG TIME!
     
  6. thacabbage

    thacabbage Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    6,993
    Likes Received:
    145
    Setting aside all figurative references to the collapse of our economy and standing in the world, the very existance of the nation has never been at stake under the Bush administration.

    You're completely ignoring the historical and philosophical background of the ideology to proscribe a definition to confirm your prejudice. A rejection of the given positive connotation of "spreading democracy" is still consistent with acceptance that that ultimately is the stated objective/ends of the movement. It is what it is. Wilsonian thought budded from the democratic peace theory that proposed that democratic nations did not engage in war with one another. Neoconservatism arose from this. For whatever reason, whether it be imperialistic, hegemonic, or even benevolent as purported by its advocates, the definition is still that there is some underlying advantage to the forced spread of democracy. Again - take the moral aspect out of this, I'm talking merely academic. Even if you hold that the reasons behind the war were hegemonic or imperalistic in securing America's own self interests, that doesn't change the fact that the vehicle was still through a spread of democracy. And that is Wilsonianism.

    Your argument would be analogous to a scenario in which the Rockets began running Adelman's motion offense this year, but I claimed that it in fact was not Adelman's motion offense they were running because 1) they sucked at running it 2) the Kings ran it much better and 3) we shouldn't even be running it in the first place because we don't have the personnel.

    For what it's worth, I have opposed the Iraq war from Day 1. I do not subscribe to the democratic peace theory. I do not think democracy can be spread by an external force but rather come as the result of liberalizing institutions from within. I also do not think that the war was fought for the benevolent reasons which were propogated. But that doesn't change the fact that it is still Wilsonianism. It is what it is.

    My reason for asking the question was simply to ponder whether the concept of 'spreading democracy' has been disproved as inherently flawed.
     
  7. rimrocker

    rimrocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 1999
    Messages:
    23,128
    Likes Received:
    10,171
    No. Neo-conservatism arose from the fantasies of second rate minds who found themselves in power and decided to treat the world like Risk. I will give you that they couched it in Wilsonian terms, but the analogy is Wilsonian Democracy is to Neo-Conservatism as Christianity is to Koreshian interpretations of the bible... both the Neo-cons and Koresh wanted to justify a naked power grab.
     
  8. Lynus302

    Lynus302 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    6,382
    Likes Received:
    199
    And anyone who watched tv in the '90's was aware of the military and intelligence cut-backs initiated by the Clinton administration. For the record, that's about the ONE thing Clinton did that I wasn't happy with.

    I'm not defending Bush. Far from it. The intel sucked, it turns out he and his administration KNEW it sucked, and they proceeded with us invading Iraq under false pretenses and tried like hell to sell it to the American people and the world.

    That's my only point on this. He will easily be remembered as one of the worst presidents we've ever had, if not the worst.
     
  9. solid

    solid Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2001
    Messages:
    21,236
    Likes Received:
    9,083
    Gas prices will drop, I paid 2.29 yesterday, and there will be some kind of military action, yep, strikes in Syria today. This stuff is getting so predictable.
     
  10. Lynus302

    Lynus302 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    6,382
    Likes Received:
    199
    I filled up for $2.09 today. That's one good thing about living in Oklahoma, I suppose.
     
  11. thacabbage

    thacabbage Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1999
    Messages:
    6,993
    Likes Received:
    145
    You are mistaken. The philosophy has been around since the 60's - predating their rise to power in the current Bush administration.
     
  12. Ottomaton

    Ottomaton Member
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2000
    Messages:
    19,201
    Likes Received:
    15,371
    It was actually the brainchild of a bunch of Prussianist Prussians who generally despised ideas like Democracy. There is a very extensive fascist/royalistic un-American pedagree behind the neocons.

    (for more examples of Prussian/German fascist proto-neocons, see Oswald Spengler, Carl Schmitt and many more)
     
    #32 Ottomaton, Oct 26, 2008
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2008
  13. weslinder

    weslinder Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    291
    Neo-conservatism and modern Progressivism are both Troskyite ideologies. They only differ on minor details. In fact, the first (and most) neo-conservatives were progressives who recognized the failures of progressivism, and blamed those failures not on the fact that Progressivism is based on false assumptions about human behavior, but rather that Progressives tended to over-reach.
     
  14. Dubious

    Dubious Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2001
    Messages:
    18,318
    Likes Received:
    5,090
    So neo-conservatism is both Troskyite and Prussian? Wilsonian and Rovian?

    I think the legacy of the Bush administration will be the story of how blind partisanship allows extremism to enact to ill considered policy decisions. From the smallest bureaucratic language interpretations to the presentation of evidence leading us to war, without active bi-partisan debate, oversight and public criticism, we decrease the chances of preconceiving consequences and increase the chances for unfair advantages and abuses.

    The Bush legacy will be why a truly democratic system produces the best possible results and how vigilant Democrats must be to prevent the subversion of the system. (Democrats by philosophy, not party)

    So far, I trust Obama to understand this (if not Pelosi).
     
  15. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,082
    Likes Received:
    3,605
    delete. duplicate
     
    #35 glynch, Oct 27, 2008
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2008
  16. glynch

    glynch Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2000
    Messages:
    18,082
    Likes Received:
    3,605
    This might be seen as another low point. Urging people to go shopping instead of calling for sacrifice and trying to lessen our dependence on Middle East Oil.

    Using the attack as an excuse to attack Iraq.
     
  17. EGYPT

    EGYPT Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,308
    Likes Received:
    3
    Bush has been a JINX on this country and the entire world.
     
  18. Landlord Landry

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Messages:
    6,857
    Likes Received:
    296
    Bush fixed daylight savings.........

    Legendary.
     
  19. Deckard

    Deckard Blade Runner
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    Messages:
    57,792
    Likes Received:
    41,232
    I've gone after Bush many times in the past for not asking the nation to step up to the plate and sacrifice to pay for fighting the war in Afghanistan and destroying the terrorists behind 9/11. We have a volunteer military that lets the rest of us Americans, who are either too old, too unhealthy, or simply unwilling (for reasons good and bad) to fight ourselves, so they do it for us, bless 'em. We get to kick back and type countless words on a BBS. Well, when that fine military needed its pay, benefits, and numbers increased, when it needed its equipment modernized and enough of it, and its veterans taken care of in a first class way, as they deserved, what did he do? What did George W. Bush do? Start another war we didn't need, and ask us to go shopping.

    Even worse, in my opinion, Bush asked for and got passed from the GOP Congress massive tax cuts in the middle of two wars, for the first time (to my knowledge) in our history. How the man can ever be defended for these policies, or anything else, astonishes me. George W. Bush is the living embodiment of The Peter Principle.
     
  20. JuanValdez

    JuanValdez Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 1999
    Messages:
    35,057
    Likes Received:
    15,231
    I think history will be kinder to Bush when it comes to the wars he's started and his role in the economy going to ****. But, I think it will be harsh on everything he has done to undermine the Constitution, democracy and the rule of law. It might just be a chip on my shoulder. But, I expect to see the Bush damage in more clarity in this arena once we begin reversing it -- a deBushification.
     

Share This Page